Softcover. Etat : Good. Edition Unstated. Text appears to have multiple markings. Cover has some wear and corner bumps. Spine is in good condition. Quantity Available: 1. Shipped Weight: Under 1 kilo. Category: Education; ISBN: 0813544203. ISBN/EAN: 9780813544205. Pictures of this item not already displayed here available upon request. Inventory No: 1561046944. N� de r�f. du vendeur 1561046944

Contacter le vendeur

Acheter D'occasion

EUR 19,85

Autre devise

Frais de port : EUR 5,96

Vers Etats-Unis

Destinations, frais et d�lais

Quantit� disponible : 1 disponible(s)

Ajouter au panier

Image d'archives

Science Talk: Changing Notions of Science in American Culture

Thurs, Daniel Patrick

Edit� par Rutgers University Press, 2008

ISBN 10 : 0813544203 ISBN 13 : 9780813544205

Ancien ou d'occasion Softcover

Vendeur : Ergodebooks, Houston, TX, Etats-Unis

�valuation du vendeur 5 sur 5 �toiles

Softcover. Etat : Good. Edition Unstated. Review This volume is a controversial and important contribution that helps clarify some of the reasons why we, as a culture, are so deeply conflicted about a major, if not the major force driving the modern world. -- James Gilbert - author of Redeeming Culture: American Religion in an Age of Science"There is much of value in Science Talk and Daniel Patrick Thurs should be commended for bringing to light the process whereby scientific controversies have evolved over time. It is an engaging study, one that will benefit all those interested in science and its place in�American history." - QUEST Product Description Science news is met by the public with a mixture of fascination and disengagement. On the one hand, Americans are inflamed by topics ranging from the question of whether or not Pluto is a planet to the ethics of stem-cell research. But the complexity of scientific research can also be confusing and overwhelming, causing many to divert their attentions elsewhere and leave science to the experts.Whether they follow science news closely or not, Americans take for granted that discoveries in the sciences are occurring constantly. Few, however, stop to consider how these advances-and the debates they sometimes lead to-contribute to the changing definition of the term science itself. Going beyond the issue-centered debates, Daniel Patrick Thurs examines what these controversies say about how we understand science now and in the future. Drawing on his analysis of magazines, newspapers, journals and other forms of public discourse, Thurs describes how science-originally used as a synonym for general knowledge-became a term to distinguish particular subjects as elite forms of study accessible only to the highly educated. From the Inside Flap Science news is met by the public with a mixture of fascination and disengagement. On the one hand, Americans are inflamed by topics ranging from the question of whether or not Pluto is a planet to the ethics of stem-cell research. But on the other hand, the complexity of scientific research can be confusing and overwhelming, causing many to divert their attentions elsewhere and leave science to the "experts."Whether they follow science news closely or not, Americans take for granted that discoveries in the sciences are constantly occurring. Few, however, stop to consider how these advances--and the debates they sometimes lead to--contribute to the changing definition of the term "science" itself. Going beyond the issue-centered debates, Daniel Patrick Thurs examines what these controversies say about how we understand science now and in the future. Drawing on his analysis of magazines, newspapers, journals and other forms of public discourse, Thurs describes how science--originally used as a synonym for general knowledge--became a term to distinguish particular subjects as elite forms of study accessible only to the highly educated. From the Back Cover Discoveries in the sciences are occurring constantly contributing to the changing defeition of the term "science" itself. Daniel Patrick Thurs examines what these controversies say about how we understand science now and in the future. Drawing on his analysis of magazines, newspapers, journals and other forms of public discourse, Thurs describes how science-originally used as a synonym for general knowledge-became a term to distinguish particular subjects as elite forms of study accessible only to the highly educated. About the Author Daniel Patrick Thurs is a fellow at the New York University's Draper Program. After receiving his Ph.D. in the history of science from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Thurs worked at Cornell University, studying public discussion of nanotechnology. He also taught at Oregon State University and the University of Portland. N� de r�f. du vendeur SONG0813544203

Contacter le vendeur