Articles liés à 【正版现货】法...
L'édition de cet ISBN n'est malheureusement plus disponible.
Afficher les exemplaires de cette édition ISBN
- ISBN 10 7562009317
- ISBN 13 9787562009313
- ReliureBroché
Acheter neuf
En savoir plus sur cette édition
EUR 45,88
Frais de port :
EUR 14,02
De Chine vers Etats-Unis
Meilleurs résultats de recherche sur AbeBooks
Image d'archives
Educational research in China and France(Chinese Edition)
ISBN 10 : 7562009317
ISBN 13 : 9787562009313
Neuf
paperback
Quantité disponible : 1
Vendeur :
Evaluation vendeur
Description du livre paperback. Etat : New. Ship out in 2 business day, And Fast shipping, Free Tracking number will be provided after the shipment.Paperback. Pub Date :2002-07 Pages: 265 Publisher: China University of Political Science and Law Press title: Education Research in China and France Original Price: 23 yuan: Ge Hongyi Press: China University of Political Science and Law Press Publication Date: 2002-7ISBN: 9787562009313 Words: Pages: 265 Edition: Binding: Paperback: Product ID: Editor's Choice No Summary The main content of the three parts of this article can be summarized as follows: The first part highlighted the reasoning activities rely on rational. legal that built on the basis of a rational nature has rational. Rational people and animals to distinguish a function and the ability. means that people have a certain understanding of the outside world and their own and control capabilities. Close relationship exists legal and rational First. the ontology of the legal existence of the fundamental problems of this law been included in the research field of view of the people through rational discourse; their decisions. the legitimacy of the law itself is through rational discourse argued. Historically. the construction of the rational discourse of the law. the purpose is to explain the law has an objective intrinsic link to clarify the legality of the law itself. and then based on the universal principles of law by relying on legitimacy; once again. a variety of legal theory. legal discourse differences are differences of rational concepts ideological background. So. we can say. The law is the product of a rational. This proposition includes two aspects: on the one hand. the law is the product of conscious activity. into has revealed that the ability to recognize legal phenomenon; the other hand. the the legal phenomenon also contains rational structure can be grasped by the human. Based on this. the management . (expand all) three parts of this article can be summarized as follows: The first part emphasizes description. the reasoning activity-dependent rational law says rational built on the basis of rational nature has . Rational people and animals to distinguish a function and the ability. means that people have a certain understanding of the outside world and their own and control capabilities. Close relationship exists legal and rational First. the ontology of the legal existence of the fundamental problems of this law been included in the research field of view of the people through rational discourse; their decisions. the legitimacy of the law itself is through rational discourse argued. Historically. the construction of the rational discourse of the law. the purpose is to explain the law has an objective intrinsic link to clarify the legality of the law itself. and then based on the universal principles of law by relying on legitimacy; once again. a variety of legal theory. legal discourse differences are differences of rational concepts ideological background. So. we can say. The law is the product of a rational. This proposition includes two aspects: on the one hand. the law is the product of conscious activity. into has revealed that the ability to recognize legal phenomenon; the other hand. the the legal phenomenon also contains rational structure can be grasped by the human. Based on this. the concept of rational law usually includes two basic characteristics: first. we firmly believe that the legal existence of the logical structure of a formalism. that the law is a system of rules. there is a legitimate hierarchical relationships between rules. The traditional rational legal concept: the legitimacy of the rules either from external objective entities (point of view) of the natural law. or rely on a higher level by virtue of their rational ability to construct up rules (the point of view of legal positivism ). Although these two points. there are some problems. but this idea is worthy of re. N° de réf. du vendeur FS057001
Acheter neuf
EUR 45,88
Autre devise