Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest - A Comparative Analysis of US Antitrust Law and EC Competition Law

Buttigieg, EUGENE

ISBN 10: 9041131191 / ISBN 13: 9789041131195

Edité par Wolters Kluwer, The Nertherlands, 2009

A propos de cet article

Hardcover without jacket; printed boards. Very good condition. Direct from the office of a retired Professor of EU Law. Spine head and lower leading corners of boards are bumped. Minor mark to lower corner of page block. Light scoring to rear board. Pages are sound and internally clean and clear. TA.

N° de réf. du vendeur 521880

Détails bibliographiques

• Titre: Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest - A Comparative Analysis of US Antitrust Law and EC Competition Law
• Éditeur: Wolters Kluwer, The Nertherlands
• Date de parution: 2009
• Langue: anglais
• ISBN à 10 chiffres: 9041131191
• ISBN à 13 chiffres: 9789041131195
• Reliure: Hardcover
• État de l'article: Very Good
• Type de livre: Very Good
• Catalogues du vendeur:
  • Law & Criminology

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis

Although it is commonly assumed that consumers benefit from the application of competition law, this is not necessarily always the case. Economic efficiency is paramount; thus, competition law in Europe and antitrust law in the United States are designed primarily to protect business competitors (and in Europe to promote market integration), and it is only incidentally that such law may also serve to protect consumers. That is the essential starting point of this penetrating critique. The author explores the extent to which US antitrust law and EC competition law adequately safeguard consumer interests. Specifically, he shows how the two jurisdictions have gone about evaluating collusive practices, abusive conduct by dominant firms and merger activity, and how the policies thus formed have impacted upon the promotion of consumer interests. He argues that unless consumer interests are directly and specifically addressed in the assessment process, maximization of consumer welfare is not sufficiently achieved. Using rigorous analysis he develops legal arguments that can accomplish such goals as the following: replace the economic theory of 'consumer welfare' with a principle of consumer well-being; build consumer benefits into specific areas of competition policy; assess competition cases so that income distribution effects are more beneficial to consumers; and control mergers in such a way that efficiencies are passed directly to consumers. The author argues that, in the last analysis, the promotion of consumer well-being should be the sole or at least the primary goal of any antitrust regime. Lawyers and scholars interested in the application and development and reform of competition law and policy will welcome this book. They will find not only a fresh approach to interpretation and practice in their field - comparing and contrasting two major systems of competition law - but also an extremely lucid analysis of the various economic arguments used to highlight the consumer welfare enhancing or welfare reducing effects of business practices.