BRACTON, HENRICUS DE 1210 1268 , (3 résultats)

Hardcover. Etat : Neu. London (Londini), Apud Richardum Tottellum. 1569. Quart. (Reprint Vico Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 2010) Titelblatt, (16), 444num.Bll. Halbleinen. Order-no.: IC-76 ISBN 3-936840-95-4 Erste Ausgabe. Henry de BRACTON (1210-1268) Die Abhandlung von Bracton war der erste Versuch, das gesamte englische Recht systematisch und in einer für die praktische Rechtsanweisung geeigneten Weise darzustellen. Das Werk zählt zu den am weitesten verbreitete Werk im englischen Rechtsraum und wurde Mitte des 16. Jahrhunderts gedruckt, nachdem unzählige Abschriften und Handschriften die Juristenausbildung beherrschten. Das Verhältnis Bractons zum römisch-gemeinen ?civil" und ?canon law" war Gegenstand wissenschaftlicher Dispute. Überwiegend geht man davon aus, dass Bracton nicht gezielt englisches Recht romanisiert hat, sondern vielmehr die Ergebnisse aus den Urteilen kirchlicher Gerichte systematisieren wollte, die bereits zu etablierten Regeln des englischen Rechts geworden waren. Insbesondere die Summa Azonis war Bracton wohlbekannt und rezipierte es in umfangreicher Weise. Henry de Bracton was probably born at Bratton Fleming in Devonshire, became an ecclesiastic and probably learned law as a royal clerk, possibly to William Raleigh, later a royal judge. He is recorded as an itinerant justice in the Midlands in 1245 and in the West of England from 1248 to 1260. He was a judge of the King`s Bench from 1248 to about 1257. In 1264 he was appointed archdeacon of Barnstaple and, later that year, chancellor of Exeter cathedral. (D. Walker, The Oxford Companion to Law, Oxford 1980) This is a complete Treatise upon the law of England as it existed when Bracton wrote. It is devided into five books, and these are subdivided with method and system, affording a copious and accurate detail of legal learning. Bracton`s method of treating his subjects, resembles that of Justinian, whom he often introduces in ipsissimis verbis, as well as the canon law, wshich has led some to suppose that he was more of the civilian and canonist than the common lawyer. At the time he wrote the Pope`s supremacy in England was abolute, and it is not surprising, therefore, that in his work we find the common, the civil, and the canon law in juxtaposition. The authority of Bracton has occasionally been questioned, when it was the fashion of the times to underrate every work in any way connected with the canon or the civil law, but this author has always had warm admirers and able defenders. Das Werk des grossen englischen Juristen Henricus de Bracton (um 1200-1268) gilt neben dem von Coke zu den bedeutenden "books of authority". Die beiden Werke gewähren dem Juristen einen fundierten Überblick zum englischen Recht bis zum 18. Jahrhundert. Kontinentaleuropa im Geltungsbereich des Jus Commune kann kein vergleichbares Werk aufbieten. Die Abhandlung von Bracton war der erste Versuch, das gesamte englische Recht systematisch und in einer für die praktische Rechtsanweisung geeigneten Weise darzustellen. Das Werk zählt zu den am weitesten verbreitete Werk im englischen Rechtsraum und wurde Mitte des 16. Jahrhunderts gedruckt, nachdem unzählige Abschriften und Handschriften die Juristenausbildung beherrschten. Vor allem wird Bractons Name allgemein mit dem umfangreichen Werk De Legibus et Consuteudinibus Angliae assoziiert. Seine Urheberschaft steht indes nicht fest. Nach neueren Forschungen wurde das Werk möglicherweise bereits zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt von einem anderen Autor (vielleicht Raleigh oder York) verfaßt und von Bracton zwischen 1230 und 1250 lediglich überarbeitet. Die Abhandlung war der erste Versuch, das gesamte englische Recht systematisch und in einer für die praktische Rechtsanwandung geeigneten Weise darzustellen. Das Werk hatte vermutlich eine weitere Verbreitung als jede andere juristische Handschrift. Mitte des 16. Jahrhunderts wurde sie gedruckt (1569) und bis zum heutigen Tag zweimal neu ediert und auch übersetzt. (T. Twiss 1878 und G. E. Woodbine 1915-42, überset.

Halbleinen. London (Londini), Apud Richardum Tottellum. 1569. Quart. (Reprint Vico Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 2012) Titelblatt, (16), 444num.Bll. Halbleinen. Wichtigstes juristisches Werk Englands im Mittelalter, entstanden zwischen 1230 und 1250, das die profunde Kenntnis der kontinentaleuropäischen Rechtsliteratur, von Bracton etwa die Summa Azonis verdeutlicht. Das Werk eines der bedeutendsten englischen Juristen überhaupt, entstanden zwischen 1230 und 1250, war der erste Versuch, das gesamte englische Recht systematisch darzustellen. Bracton kannte die Summa Azonis gut und arbeitete auf dieser Grundlage das Ius Romanum in sein Werk ein. Das Opus zählt zu dem am weitesten verbreitete Werk im englischen Rechtsraum. Das Verhältnis Bractons zum römisch-gemeinen civil" und canon law" war oft Gegenstand wissenschaftlicher Dispute. Überwiegend geht man davon aus, dass Bracton nicht gezielt englisches Recht romanisiert hat, sondern vielmehr die Ergebnisse aus den Urteilen kirchlicher Gerichte systematisieren wollte, die bereits zu etablierten Regeln des englischen Rechts geworden waren. Henry de Bracton was probably born at Bratton Fleming in Devonshire, became an ecclesiastic and probably learned law as a royal clerk, possibly to William Raleigh, later a royal judge. He is recorded as an itinerant justice in the Midlands in 1245 and in the West of England from 1248 to 1260. He was a judge of the King`s Bench from 1248 to about 1257. In 1264 he was appointed archdeacon of Barnstaple and, later that year, chancellor of Exeter cathedral. (D. Walker, The Oxford Companion to Law, Oxford 1980) This is a complete Treatise upon the law of England as it existed when Bracton wrote. It is divided into five books, and these are subdivided with method and system, affording a copious and accurate detail of legal learning. Bracton`s method of treating his subjects, resembles that of Justinian, whom he often introduces in ipsissimis verbis, as well as the canon law, which has led some to suppose that he was more of the civilian and canonist than the common lawyer. At the time he wrote the Pope`s supremacy in England was abolute, and it is not surprising, therefore, that in his work we find the common, the civil, and the canon law in juxtaposition. The authority of Bracton has occasionally been questioned, when it was the fashion of the times to underrate every work in any way connected with the canon or the civil law, but this author has always had warm admirers and able defenders. Liber primus: De rerum divisione Liber secundus: De Acquirendo rerum dominio Liber tertius: De Actionibus in primo tractatu in eodem libro: De Corona in secundo tractatus Liber quartus: De Assisis novae disseysinae in primo tractatu in eodem libro: De Assisis ultimae praesentationis in secundo tractatu In eodem libro: de Consanguinitate in quarto tractatu In eodem libro: De Assis Iuris utrum in quinto tractatu In eodem libro: De Dote in sexto tractatu In eodem libro: De Ingressu in septimo tractatu In Quinto libro: De Breve de recto in primo tractatu In eodem libro: De Essoniis in secundo tractatu In eodem libro: De Defaltis in tertio tractatu In eodem libro: De Warrantia in quarto tractatu In eodem libro: De Exceptionibus in quinto tractatu. Coing, Handbuch I,302ff. (Horn): "Die bedeutendste Leistung ist das Werk des königlichen Richters und Klerikers Henricus de Bracton. Bractons Kenntnis der gelehrten Rechte und der legistischen Literatur, insbesondere von Azos Summa, wirkte sich nicht nur in der Terminologie und im Aufbau des Werkes aus, sondern auch in der Einarbeitung materieller Rechtssätze des römischen Rechts.".

London (Londini), Typis Milonis Flesher & Roberti Young, Assign: Johannis More Armig., 1640. Quart. Titelblatt mit Vignette, (16), 444gezählte Blätter. Späterer Halbpergamentband mit alten Material gebunden, Pergamentecken. Henry de Bracton was probably born at Bratton Fleming in Devonshire, became an ecclesiastic and probably learned law as a royal clerk, possibly to William Raleigh, later a royal judge. He is recorded as an itinerant justice in the Midlands in 1245 and in the West of England from 1248 to 1260. He was a judge of the King`s Bench from 1248 to about 1257. In 1264 he was appointed archdeacon of Barnstaple and, later that year, chancellor of Exeter cathedral. (D. Walker, The Oxford Companion to Law, Oxford 1980) This is a complete Treatise upon the law of England as it existed when Bracton wrote. It is devided into five books, and these are subdivided with method and system, affording a copious and accurate detail of legal learning. Bracton`s method of treating his subjects, resembles that of Justinian, whom he often introduces in ipsissimis verbis, as well as the canon law, wshich has led some to suppose that he was more of the civilian and canonist than the common lawyer. At the time he wrote the Pope`s supremacy in England was abolute, and it is not surprising, therefore, that in his work we find the common, the civil, and the canon law in juxtaposition. The authority of Bracton has occasionally been questioned, when it was the fashion of the times to underrate every work in any way connected with the canon or the civil law, but this author has always had warm admirers and able defenders. Liber primus: De rerum divisione Liber secundus: De Acquirendo rerum dominio Liber tertius: De Actionibus in primo tractatu in eodem libro: De Corona in secundo tractatus Liber quartus: De Assisis novae disseysinae in primo tractatu in eodem libro: De Assisis ultimae praesentationis in secundo tractatu In eodem libro: de Consanguinitate in quarto tractatu In eodem libro: De Assis Iuris utrum in quinto tractatu In eodem libro: De Dote in sexto tractatu In eodem libro: De Ingressu in septimo tractatu In Quinto libro: De Breve de recto in primo tractatu In eodem libro: De Essoniis in secundo tractatu In eodem libro: De Defaltis in tertio tractatu In eodem libro: De Warrantia in quarto tractatu In eodem libro: De Exceptionibus in quinto tractatu. This is a complete Treatise upon the law of England as it existed when Bracton wrote. It is devided into five books, and these are subdivided with method and system, affording a copious and accurate detail of legal learning. Bracton`s method of treating his subjects, resembles that of Justinian, whom he often introduces in ipsissimis verbis, as well as the canon law, wshich has led some to suppose that he was more of the civilian and canonist than the common lawyer. At the time he wrote the Pope`s supremacy in England was abolute, and it is not surprising, therefore, that in his work we find the common, the civil, and the canon law in juxtaposition. The authority of Bracton has occasionally been questioned, when it was the fashion of the times to underrate every work in any way connected with the canon or the civil law, but this author has always had warm admirers and able defenders. Fulbech, two hundred and fifty years since, says - "There be some ancient writers of the law, namely Bracton, Britton, and Glainville, whom, as it is not unprofitable to read, so to rely upon them is dangerous; for most of that which they do give forth for law is now antiquated and abolished; their books are monumenta adorandae rubignis, which be of more reverence than authority." Fitzherbert informs us that it was agreed by the whole court in 35 Hen. VI. that BRacton was never taken for an authority in our law. Upon reference to the Year Book it appears that Fitzherbert is not warranted in the assertion. Plowden, in his Commentaries, says that Bracton and Granville were not authorities in our law, but are only cited as ornaments to discourse when they agree with the law. Staunforde, however, held this father of the English law in such high estimation, "that he ventured to cite and argue from him upon the bench" - and Fortescue Aland said, that "the law books of Bracton and Fleta were the ancient law of the land, extending to all cases. These books are so strong that there has been non means of evading them but by denying their authority, and calling them books of civil law, and I never knew them denied for law except whre some statute or ancient usage has altered them." In profundity and extent of legal learning, Bracton holds a deservedly high rank among the early English legal writers, and his work has been and is quoted and relied on by all our great judges and lawyers as to what the common law was at the time he wrote. It is written in a better style and purer Latin than Glanville, which in part may be attributed to the author`s familiarity with the Roman law. The work for a long time remained in manuscript, and many copies of it were in circulation, with additions and notes by various ahnds, before it was printed. It was no easy task to compile a genuine text out of any copy, and the book was published, differing, as it is supposed, from the author`s arrangement and distribution of the subject. The editions are, folio, London, 1569. 4to. 1640. In printing this last edition, some pains, as it appears from the preface, was taken by the editor, T. N., to correct and improve the next, by collating it with various manuscripts, which duty, it is to be regretted, was not as carefully performed as it ought to have been, there being at hte time several manuscripts in existence, and accessible, more correct than the printed second edition. (Marvin 140-141).