Type d'article
Etat
Reliure
Particularités
Pays
Evaluation du vendeur
Edité par The University Of Chicago, Chicago, 1918
Vendeur : Alexander Books (ABAC/ILAB), Ancaster, ON, Canada
Livre Edition originale
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. 1st Edition. 188 Pages, Previous Owners Small Stamp O/W Sound.
Edité par University of Chicago, 1918
Vendeur : Windows Booksellers, Eugene, OR, Etats-Unis
Membre d'association : CBA
Hardcover with dust jacket. G/G. Dust jacket is edge chipped, worn and discolored; covered with mylar. Boards are slightly edge worn. 188 pp.
Edité par University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1918
Vendeur : curtis paul books, inc., Northridge, CA, Etats-Unis
Edition originale Signé
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good+. Etat de la jaquette : Poor. First Edition. Navy cloth titled in gilt. Inscribed to ffep by Hefelbower. PO name to ffep, occasional pencilled marginalia plus a few pencilled notes at rear. Trace of foxing. The DJ in mylar is separated into two parts, and has loss to heel. Hefelbower (1871-1950) was a Lutheran pastor and president of Gettysburg College. ; 8vo 8" - 9" tall; Signed by Author.
Edité par Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1918., 1918
Vendeur : Ted Kottler, Bookseller, Redondo Beach, CA, Etats-Unis
Edition originale
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Etat de la jaquette : Good. 1st Edition. First Edition. viii, 188 pp. Original cloth. Very Good+, in good+ dust jacket. 'Samuel Hefelbower in The Relation of John Locke to English Deism remarks that among the progressives -- theologians, philosophers and deists -- all accepted a rationalistic religion. The question then becomes what exactly is the role of reason vis à vis revelation. The discussion of the relation of reason to revelation goes back at least to Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas -- that is to the scholastic authorities. Albert held that reason has a role to play in religion, but there are questions where philosophy has no final answer and revelation must decide. Revelation is above reason but not contrary to it. Thomas has a similar position (Hefelbower, p. 47). Locke still held the view that there is revelation that tells us about things above reason but not contrary to it. And reason is responsible for determining what counts as genuine revelation. The Deists tend to hold a more radical view than the one that Locke advocates' (Anthony Collins entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).