It is a near truism of philosophy of language that sentences are prior to words. Sentences, it is said, are what we believe, assert, and argue for; uses of them constitute our evidence in semantics; only they stand in inferential relations, and are true or false. Sentences are, indeed, the only things that fundamentally have meaning.
Does this near truism really hold of human languages? Robert Stainton, drawing on a wide body of evidence, argues forcefully that speakers can and do use mere words, not sentences, to communicate complete thoughts. He then considers the implications of this empirical result for language-thought relations, various doctrines of sentence primacy, and the semantics-pragmatics boundary.
The book is important both for its philosophical and empirical claims, and for the methodology employed. Stainton illustrates how the methods and detailed results of the various cognitive sciences can bear on central issues in philosophy of language. At the same time, he applies philosophical distinctions with subtlety and care, to show that arguments which seemingly support the primacy of sentences do not really do so. The result is a paradigm example of The New Philosophy of Language: a rich melding of empirical work with traditional philosophy of language.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
It is a near truism of philosophy of language that sentences are prior to words. Sentences, it is said, are what we believe, assert, and argue for; uses of them constitute our evidence in semantics; only they stand in inferential relations, and are true or false. Sentences are, indeed, the only things that fundamentally have meaning. Does this near truism really hold of human languages? Robert Stainton, drawing on a wide body of evidence, argues forcefully that speakers can and do use mere words, not sentences, to communicate complete thoughts. He then considers the implications of this empirical result for language-thought relations, various doctrines of sentence primacy, and the semantics-pragmatics boundary. The book is important both for its philosophical and empirical claims, and for the methodology employed. Stainton illustrates how the methods and detailed results of the various cognitive sciences can bear on central issues in philosophy of language. At the same time, he applies philosophical distinctions with subtlety and care, to show that arguments which seemingly support the primacy of sentences do not really do so. The result is a paradigm example of The New Philosophy of Language: a rich melding of empirical work with traditional philosophy of language.
clearly written, meticulously organized, well argued, and highly informative book...Words and Thoughts is an interesting and often fascinating book. There is much to learn from it, thanks to the rich and varied linguistic ideas and psychological findings that Stainton brings into the discussion. (Kent Bach Mind)
Stainton is a meticulous philosopher. In Words and Thoughts, he explains his positions and those of his opponents in great detail and with great care. . . . the book is overall easy to read. . . . Words and Thoughts is to be enthusiastically recommended to philosophers of language, particularly to the growing group of philosophers conversant with the cutting-edge work in linguistics. (Edouard Machery, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews)
The harmony of this book is striking and laudable ... This book has consequences on the relationship between language and thought ... the book is interesting and rich in ideas ... should be read with great interest. (Alessandro Capone, University of Messina)
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Reader's Corner, Inc., Raleigh, NC, Etats-Unis
Hardcover. Etat : New. Etat de la jaquette : New. First Edition, First Printing. This is a new hardcover first edition, first printing copy in a new mylar protected DJ, black spine. N° de réf. du vendeur 089988
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Magus Books Seattle, Seattle, WA, Etats-Unis
Hardcover. Etat : VG. Etat de la jaquette : Very Good. used hardcover in a dust jacket. jacket is slightly worn about the edges, but with no tears and not price clipped. pages and binding are clean, straight and tight. there are no marks to the text or other serious flaws. N° de réf. du vendeur 1461474
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Midtown Scholar Bookstore, Harrisburg, PA, Etats-Unis
hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Signed. Inscribed by author on first page. With very good dust jacket. Very Good hardcover with light shelfwear - NICE! Standard-sized. N° de réf. du vendeur mon0000323048
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Daedalus Books, Portland, OR, Etats-Unis
Cloth. Etat : Fine. Etat de la jaquette : Fine. 8vo. N° de réf. du vendeur 339800
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Powell's Bookstores Chicago, ABAA, Chicago, IL, Etats-Unis
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Etat de la jaquette : Very Good. 1. Cloth, dj. Minor shelf wear. Else a bright, clean copy. It is a near truism of philosophy of language that sentences are prior to words. Sentences, it is said, are what we believe, assert, and argue for; uses of them constitute our evidence in semantics; only they stand in inferential relations, and are true or false. Sentences are, indeed, the only things that fundamentally have meaning.Does this near truism really hold of human languages? Robert Stainton, drawing on a wide body of evidence, argues forcefully that speakers can and do use mere words, not sentences, to communicate complete thoughts. He then considers the implications of this empirical result for language-thought relations, various doctrines of sentence primacy, and the semantics-pragmatics boundary.The book is important both for its philosophical and empirical claims, and for the methodology employed. Stainton illustrates how the methods and detailed results of the various cognitive sciences can bear on central issues in philosophy of language. At the same time, he applies philosophical distinctions with subtlety and care, to show that arguments which seemingly support the primacy of sentences do not really do so. The result is a paradigm example of The New Philosophy of Language: a richmelding of empirical work with traditional philosophy of language. N° de réf. du vendeur 2040879
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Powell's Bookstores Chicago, ABAA, Chicago, IL, Etats-Unis
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Etat de la jaquette : Very Good. 1. Cloth, dj. Minor shelf wear; jacket lightly scuffed. Else a bright, clean copy. It is a near truism of philosophy of language that sentences are prior to words. Sentences, it is said, are what we believe, assert, and argue for; uses of them constitute our evidence in semantics; only they stand in inferential relations, and are true or false. Sentences are, indeed, the only things that fundamentally have meaning.Does this near truism really hold of human languages? Robert Stainton, drawing on a wide body of evidence, argues forcefully that speakers can and do use mere words, not sentences, to communicate complete thoughts. He then considers the implications of this empirical result for language-thought relations, various doctrines of sentence primacy, and the semantics-pragmatics boundary.The book is important both for its philosophical and empirical claims, and for the methodology employed. Stainton illustrates how the methods and detailed results of the various cognitive sciences can bear on central issues in philosophy of language. At the same time, he applies philosophical distinctions with subtlety and care, to show that arguments which seemingly support the primacy of sentences do not really do so. The result is a paradigm example of The New Philosophy of Language: a richmelding of empirical work with traditional philosophy of language. N° de réf. du vendeur 2040878
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Daedalus Books, Portland, OR, Etats-Unis
Cloth. Etat : Fine. Etat de la jaquette : Fine. 8vo. N° de réf. du vendeur 339799
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Milbury Books, New Romney, Royaume-Uni
Hardcover. Etat : Fine. Etat de la jaquette : Near Fine. 1st Edition. A Fine 1st Edition copy in a Near Fine dust wrapper which displays some surface rubbing but no creases, nicks or tears. Please see five pictures attached for a closer look. N° de réf. du vendeur ABE-1696332590778
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Kloof Booksellers & Scientia Verlag, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas
Etat : very good. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 2006. Hardcover. Dustjacket. xi,248 pp. Includes bibliographical references (p. [233]-242) and index. Condition : very good copy. ISBN 9780199250387. Keywords : PHILOSOPHY, N° de réf. du vendeur 179952
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Paul Brown, Ramsgate, Royaume-Uni
First edition 2006. xi+248 pages with index. Cloth. New. Fine in dustjacket. It is a near truism of philosophy of language that sentences are prior to words. Sentences, it is said, are what we believe, assert, and argue for; uses of them constitute our evidence in semantics; only they stand in inferential relations, and are true or false. Sentences are, indeed, the only things that fundamentally have meaning. Does this near truism really hold of human languages? Robert Stainton, drawing on a wide body of evidence, argues forcefully that speakers can and do use mere words, not sentences, to communicate complete thoughts. He then considers the implications of this empirical result for language-thought relations, various doctrines of sentence primacy, and the semantics-pragmatics boundary. The book is important both for its philosophical and empirical claims, and for the methodology employed. Stainton illustrates how the methods and detailed results of the various cognitive sciences can bear on central issues in philosophy of language. At the same time, he applies philosophical distinctions with subtlety and care, to show that arguments which seemingly support the primacy of sentences do not really do so. The result is a paradigm example of The New Philosophy of Language: a rich melding of empirical work with traditional philosophy of language. Ask to see our other Language titles. N° de réf. du vendeur 20188
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)