Articles liés à The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Synopsis
At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law.
The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
À propos de l?auteur
Robert Alexy has been Professor of Public Law and Legal Philosophy at Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, since 1986. He was President of the German Section of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR) from 1994-1998. Other books published by OUP include A Theory of Legal Argumentation and A Theory of Constitutional Rights.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Acheter neuf
Afficher cet article
EUR 37,34
EUR 4,61 expédition depuis Royaume-Uni vers France
Destinations, frais et délais
Résultats de recherche pour The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Image d'archives
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Edité par
Oxford University Press, 2010
ISBN 10 : 0199584214
ISBN 13 : 9780199584215
Ancien ou d'occasion
Paperback
Vendeur : WorldofBooks, Goring-By-Sea, WS, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Paperback. Etat : Very Good. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged. N° de réf. du vendeur GOR013112707
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image d'archives
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Edité par
Oxford University Press, 2010
ISBN 10 : 0199584214
ISBN 13 : 9780199584215
Neuf
Couverture souple
Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. In. N° de réf. du vendeur ria9780199584215_new
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image d'archives
The Argument from Injustice
impression à la demandeVendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L0-9780199584215
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image d'archives
The Argument from Injustice
impression à la demandeVendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L0-9780199584215
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image fournie par le vendeur
The Argument from Injustice
Edité par
Oxford University Press, GB, 2009
ISBN 10 : 0199584214
ISBN 13 : 9780199584215
Neuf
Paperback
Vendeur : Rarewaves.com UK, London, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Paperback. Etat : New. At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law.The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content. N° de réf. du vendeur LU-9780199584215
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image d'archives
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Vendeur : Chiron Media, Wallingford, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 4 sur 5 étoiles
PF. Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 6666-IUK-9780199584215
Quantité disponible : 10 disponible(s)
Image d'archives
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism
Edité par
Oxford University Press, 2010
ISBN 10 : 0199584214
ISBN 13 : 9780199584215
Neuf
Paperback / softback
Vendeur : THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Paperback / softback. Etat : New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 233. N° de réf. du vendeur C9780199584215
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image fournie par le vendeur
The Argument from Injustice
Edité par
Oxford University Press, GB, 2009
ISBN 10 : 0199584214
ISBN 13 : 9780199584215
Neuf
Paperback
Vendeur : Rarewaves.com USA, London, LONDO, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Paperback. Etat : New. At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law.The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content. N° de réf. du vendeur LU-9780199584215
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image fournie par le vendeur
The Argument from Injustice
Vendeur : moluna, Greven, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. Alexy confronts the legal positivist view in this classic work of legal philosophy. He formulates an accessible concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism with nonpositivistic legal theory, challenging the prevailing or. N° de réf. du vendeur 446844856
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image fournie par le vendeur
Argument from Injustice : A Reply to Legal Positivism
Edité par
Oxford University Press, 2010
ISBN 10 : 0199584214
ISBN 13 : 9780199584215
Neuf
Couverture souple
Vendeur : GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 9118212-n
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles