The last two decades have witnessed an exponential growth in debates on the use of foreign law by courts. Different labels have been attached to the same phenomenon: judges drawing inspiration from outside of their national legal systems for solving purely domestic disputes. By doing so, the judges are said to engage in cross-border judicial dialogues. They are creating a larger, transnational community of judges.
This book puts similar claims to test in relation to highest national jurisdictions (supreme and constitutional courts) in Europe today. How often and why do judges choose to draw inspiration from foreign materials in solving domestic cases? The book addresses these questions from both an empirical and a theoretical angle. Empirically, the genuine use of comparative arguments by national highest courts in five European jurisdictions is examined: England and Wales, France, Germany, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. On the basis of comparative discussion of the practice and its national theoretical underpinning in these and partially also in other European systems, an overreaching theoretical framework for the current judicial use of comparative arguments is developed.
Drawing on the author's own past judicial experience in a national supreme court, this book is a critical account of judicial engagement with foreign authority in Europe today. The sober middle ground inductively conceptualized and presented in this book provides solid jurisprudential foundations for the ongoing use of comparative arguments by courts as well as its further scholarly discussion.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Michal Bobek is Professor of European Law at the College of Europe. Formerly Anglo-German Fellow at the Institute of European and Comparative Law, University of Oxford, he remains associated with the Institute. He qualified as judge in the Czech Republic and worked as legal secretary to the President of the Supreme Administrative Court, where he also headed the Research and Documentation Department of the Court.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : killarneybooks, Inagh, CLARE, Irlande
Hardcover. Etat : Near Fine. 1st Edition. Hardcover, ix + 310 pages, NOT ex-library. Minor handling wear, book is clean and bright throughout, with unmarked text, free of inscriptions and stamps, firmly bound. Untorn, gently shelfworn dust jacket. -- This book offers a comprehensive, empirically grounded analysis of how and why the highest courts in select European legal systems (England and Wales, France, Germany, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia) make reference to foreign legal materials when resolving domestic cases. Focusing on non-mandatory uses of comparative reasoning - where judges choose, rather than are legally obliged, to cite foreign law - the book investigates the practical scope, frequency, and conceptual legitimacy of such references in supreme and constitutional court decisions. It begins by mapping the broader scholarly context, including widespread but largely untested claims about a rise in judicial transnational dialogue, and sets out to test these claims through a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods. The author identifies three general categories of foreign law use: mandatory (e.g. conflict of laws), advisable (e.g. shared legal traditions), and voluntary (non-binding, optional citation), with primary focus on the last two. The first part of the book lays a typological and theoretical groundwork, examining historical shifts in the openness of legal systems to foreign influence, and assessing the contextual, institutional, procedural, and personal factors that impact a court's willingness and ability to engage in comparative reasoning - such as size and age of the legal system, presence of analytical support staff, or costs of litigation. The second part presents detailed national case studies, each of which assesses doctrinal and methodological traditions, judicial attitudes, and patterns of comparative reference. For instance, the UK system demonstrates selective engagement with other common law jurisdictions; French courts show more implicit than explicit comparative references; German courts rely heavily on doctrinal scholarship; while in post-communist countries such as the Czech Republic and Slovakia, comparative citation emerged prominently after 1989 but has since become more constrained. These studies are based on original-language primary sources, interviews with judges, and the author's insider access to judicial networks and materials. The third part of the book offers a positivistic theoretical appraisal, addressing questions such as when comparative reasoning is justified, how it is constrained by systemic norms (e.g. it can be persuasive but not binding), and what institutional or stylistic factors shape whether foreign law is openly cited or silently consulted. The author also revisits classic concerns such as the legitimacy, methodology, and predictability of comparative reasoning, showing how these concerns play out differently in Continental and common law traditions. The final chapter explores deviations from the norm, such as politically motivated overuse of foreign references during legal transitions (e.g. Central Europe) or conscious rejection of such reasoning (e.g. US debates). For academic researchers and legal professionals, this book provides a rare, structured, and data-informed resource for understanding the actual judicial practice of comparative reasoning across varied jurisdictions. It is especially relevant for scholars of comparative constitutional law, legal method, judicial behavior, or transnational legal theory, and can be used to design empirical or doctrinal studies, develop judicial training programs, or evaluate reform proposals. Its detailed typology and comparative framework also make it a valuable reference for judges and court advisors considering whether, when, and how to incorporate comparative legal arguments into domestic decision-making processes. N° de réf. du vendeur 011507
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Brook Bookstore On Demand, Napoli, NA, Italie
Etat : new. Questo è un articolo print on demand. N° de réf. du vendeur 857e6ff5d0e9a6e48ff4a5820e603bb8
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Royaume-Uni
Hardcover. Etat : Like New. Like New .Ships From Multiple Locations. book. N° de réf. du vendeur ERICA79101996803884
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Etats-Unis
Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition. N° de réf. du vendeur 19631172
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
HRD. Etat : New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L1-9780199680382
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 19631172-n
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
HRD. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L1-9780199680382
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 19631172-n
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Royaume-Uni
Hardback. Etat : New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days. N° de réf. du vendeur B9780199680382
Quantité disponible : 15 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. In English. N° de réf. du vendeur ria9780199680382_new
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles