In the contentious debate among contemporary epistemologists and philosophers regarding justification, there is one consensus: justification is distinct from knowledge; there are justified beliefs that do not amount to knowledge, even if all instances of knowledge are instances of justified belief. In Without Justification, Jonathan Sutton forcefully opposes this claim. He proposes instead that justified belief simply is knowledge -- not because there is more knowledge than has been supposed, but because there are fewer justified beliefs. There are, he argues, no false justified beliefs. Sutton suggests that the distinction between justified belief and knowledge is drawn only in contemporary epistemology, and suggests furter that classic philosophers of both ancient and modern times would not have questioned the idea that justification is identical to knowledge. Sutton argues both that we do not (perhaps even cannot) have a serviceable notion of justification that is distinct from knowledge and that we do not need one. We can get by better in epistemology, he writes, without it. Sutton explores the topics of testimony and evidence, and proposes an account of these two key epistemological topics that relies on the notion of knowledge alone. He also addresses inference (both deductive and inductive), internalism versus externalism in epistemology, functionalism, the paradox of the preface, and the lottery paradox. Sutton argues that all of us--philosopher and nonphilosopher alike--should stick to what we know; we should believe something only if we know it to be so. Further, we should not believe what someone tells us unless we know that he knows what he is talking about. These views are radical, he argues, only in the context of contemporary epistemology's ill-founded distinction between knowledge and justification.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Jonathan Sutton is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Auburn University.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
EUR 3,85 expédition vers Etats-Unis
Destinations, frais et délaisEUR 3,85 expédition vers Etats-Unis
Destinations, frais et délaisVendeur : Powell's Bookstores Chicago, ABAA, Chicago, IL, Etats-Unis
Etat : Used - Very Good. 2007. Paperback. Very Good. N° de réf. du vendeur Z0199277
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Powell's Bookstores Chicago, ABAA, Chicago, IL, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. 2007. Paperback. New. N° de réf. du vendeur PN001009
Quantité disponible : 6 disponible(s)
Vendeur : BookResQ., West Valley City, UT, Etats-Unis
paperback. Etat : Good. Ex-library book with typical stickers and stampings. Priority Mail is available on this item. No international shipping. N° de réf. du vendeur C340824ACmug171366
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Pulpfiction Books, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Soft cover. Etat : Fine. Fine trade paperback, a clean copy. N° de réf. du vendeur 005089
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : UBUCUU S.R.L., Bucharest, Roumanie
Paperback. Etat : New. New Edition. N° de réf. du vendeur M-9780262693479-0
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Antiquariaat Schot, Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht, Pays-Bas
VI, 180 p. Paperback. N° de réf. du vendeur 173835
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Kloof Booksellers & Scientia Verlag, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas
Etat : as new. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2007. Paperback. 208 pp.- In the contentious debate among contemporary epistemologists and philosophers regarding justification, there is one consensus: justification is distinct from knowledge; there are justified beliefs that do not amount to knowledge, even if all instances of knowledge are instances of justified belief. In Without Justification, Jonathan Sutton forcefully opposes this claim. He proposes instead that justified belief simply is knowledge--not because there is more knowledge than has been supposed, but because there are fewer justified beliefs. There are, he argues, no false justified beliefs.Sutton suggests that the distinction between justified belief and knowledge is drawn only in contemporary epistemology, and suggests furter that classic philosophers of both ancient and modern times would not have questioned the idea that justification is identical to knowledge.Sutton argues both that we do not (perhaps even cannot) have a serviceable notion of justification that is distinct from knowledge and that we do not need one. We can get by better in epistemology, he writes, without it. Sutton explores the topics of testimony and evidence, and proposes an account of these two key epistemological topics that relies on the notion of knowledge alone. He also addresses inference (both deductive and inductive), internalism versus externalism in epistemology, functionalism, the paradox of the preface, and the lottery paradox. English text. Condition : as new. Condition : as new copy. ISBN 9780262693479. Keywords : PHILOSOPHY, Justification. N° de réf. du vendeur 41583
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Kloof Booksellers & Scientia Verlag, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas
Etat : as new. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2007. Paperback. 180 pp. Condition : as new. - In the contentious debate among contemporary epistemologists and philosophers regarding justification, there is one consensus: justification is distinct from knowledge; there are justified beliefs that do not amount to knowledge, even if all instances of knowledge are instances of justified belief. In Without Justification, Jonathan Sutton forcefully opposes this claim. He proposes instead that justified belief simply is knowledge -- not because there is more knowledge than has been supposed, but because there are fewer justified beliefs. There are, he argues, no false justified beliefs. Sutton suggests that the distinction between justified belief and knowledge is drawn only in contemporary epistemology, and suggests furter that classic philosophers of both ancient and modern times would not have questioned the idea that justification is identical to knowledge. Sutton argues both that we do not (perhaps even cannot) have a serviceable notion of justification that is distinct from knowledge and that we do not need one. We can get by better in epistemology, he writes, without it. Sutton explores the topics of testimony and evidence, and proposes an account of these two key epistemological topics that relies on the notion of knowledge alone. He also addresses inference (both deductive and inductive), internalism versus externalism in epistemology, functionalism, the paradox of the preface, and the lottery paradox. Sutton argues that all of us--philosopher and nonphilosopher alike--should stick to what we know; we should believe something only if we know it to be so. Condition : as new copy. ISBN 9780262693479. Keywords : PHILOSOPHY, N° de réf. du vendeur 275696
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Revaluation Books, Exeter, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : Brand New. 180 pages. 8.75x6.00x0.50 inches. In Stock. N° de réf. du vendeur zk026269347X
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)