Synopsis
In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., laid out a new test for federal trial judges to use when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. In Daubert, the Court ruled that judges should act as gatekeepers, assessing the reliability of the scientific methodology and reasoning that supports expert testimony. The resulting judicial screening of expert testimony has been particularly consequential. While the Supreme Court sought to bring better science into the courtroom, questions remain about whether the lower courts' application of Daubert accords with scientific practices. This report summarizes discussions held by an ad hoc committee of the The National Academies to consider the impact of Daubert and subsequent Supreme Court opinions and to identify questions for future study.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
À propos de l?auteur
Kathi E. Hanna and Anne-Marie Mazza, Rapporteurs, Committee on Daubert Standards, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, National Research Council
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Résultats de recherche pour Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards: Summary...
Image fournie par le vendeur
Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards: Summary of Meetings
Edité par
The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2006
ISBN 10 : 0309102480
ISBN 13 : 9780309102483
Ancien ou d'occasion
Paperback
Vendeur : Underground Books, ABAA, Carrollton, GA, Etats-Unis
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Paperback. Etat : Good +. Paperback. 10" X 7". ix, 35pp. Very mild creasing and shelf wear to covers, corners, and edges of pictorial paper wraps. Pages are clean and unmarked. Binding is sound. ABOUT THIS BOOK: In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., laid out a new test for federal trial judges to use when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. In Daubert, the Court ruled that judges should act as gatekeepers, assessing the reliability of the scientific methodology and reasoning that supports expert testimony. The resulting judicial screening of expert testimony has been particularly consequential. While the Supreme Court sought to bring better science into the courtroom, questions remain about whether the lower courts' application of Daubert accords with scientific practices. This report summarizes discussions held by an ad hoc committee of the The National Academies to consider the impact of Daubert and subsequent Supreme Court opinions and to identify questions for future study.(Publisher). N° de réf. du vendeur 11982
Acheter D'occasion
EUR 17,33
Expédition à EUR 4,63
Expédition nationale : Etats-Unis
Expédition nationale : Etats-Unis
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)