Recording Conceptual Art: Early Interviews with Barry, Huebler, Kaltenbach, LeWitt, Morris, Oppenheim, Siegelaub, Smithson, and Weiner by Patricia Norvell - Couverture souple

Couverture souple

ISBN 10 : 0520220110 ISBN 13 : 9780520220119

Editeur : University of California Press, 2001

Synopsis

Recording Conceptual Art features a highly provocative series of previously unpublished interviews conducted in early 1969 with some of the most dynamic, daring, and innovative artists of the tumultuous 1960s. The nine individuals—eight artists and one art dealer—are now known as major contributors to Conceptual art. These fascinating dialogues, conducted by Patricia Norvell, provide tantalizing moments of spontaneous philosophizing and brilliant insights, as well as moments of unabashed self-importance, with highly imaginative and colorful individuals.

A propos du livre

À propos de l'auteur

Alexander Alberro is Assistant Professor of Modern Art at the University of Florida. He is coeditor of Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology (1999) and editor of Two-Way Mirror Power: Selected Writings by Dan Graham on His Art (1999). Patricia Norvell is an artist living in New York City. Her work has appeared widely in public spaces and galleries across the United States. She has taught at Columbia University, Hunter College, and other institutions.

À propos de la quatrième de couverture

"Reading the interviews gathered by Patricia Norvell more than thirty years ago is like opening one of the time capsules Steven Kaltenbach made at around the same time and discusses here. It makes one feel nostalgic for these uncompromising times-so much has changed, so fast! One should be immensely grateful to Norvell for her undertaking and, paradoxically, for the long delay in the publication of these conversations: nothing could have better highlighted the candor and commitment of the artists who participated in this project than their willingness, long after the fact, to let their youthful voices be heard unedited. This is a precious document that casts a fresh light on the early history of Conceptual art, revealing all the doubts and uncertainties its practitioners had to overcome."—Yve-Alain Bois, Harvard University

"These interviews, full of the rich texture and confusion of an art movement at its inception, began as a "process piece" in mid-1969 when formalism still seemed worth defeating. The artists, tired of talking about turpentine, struggle to extend the rhetoric of form, and as they do so, reveal their roles as theorists and philosophers of a newly cerebral art, Conceptualism. Alberro's helpful introduction frames both Norvell's provocative questions and the surprising responses in a useful book that continues the process of historicizing 20th century art."—Caroline Jones, author of Machine in the Studio

"The contemporary interviews collected in this volume shift the ground on which conceptualism in the United States should be understood. The middle months of 1969 were a time of artistic and social unease when artists were anxious to test-and occasionally to declaim, as the interviews demonstrate-ideas in conversation with a sympathetic interlocutor. Patricia Norvell proves to have been an ideal listener. She knew conceptualism well enough to keep the conversations honest, but not so well as to make the artists defensive and wary. The artists had things to say, and were not afraid to put themselves out on a limb."—John O'Brian, Professor of Art History, University of British Columbia

"A key document of the late 1960s avant-garde."—James Meyer, Emory University

"[This book is] a reminder that the project of Conceptual art and its artists' reasons for refusing the object of art were far from monolithic. The differences that emerge in the interviews are spoken in voices that are still fresh and particular, but each voice and position is tied to the moment of the late 1960s, from stoned mysticism to philosophical idealism, from political optimism to materialist critique."—Howard Singerman, author of Art Subjects

À propos de la deuxième de couverture

"Reading the interviews gathered by Patricia Norvell more than thirty years ago is like opening one of the time capsules Steven Kaltenbach made at around the same time and discusses here. It makes one feel nostalgic for these uncompromising times-so much has changed, so fast! One should be immensely grateful to Norvell for her undertaking and, paradoxically, for the long delay in the publication of these conversations: nothing could have better highlighted the candor and commitment of the artists who participated in this project than their willingness, long after the fact, to let their youthful voices be heard unedited. This is a precious document that casts a fresh light on the early history of Conceptual art, revealing all the doubts and uncertainties its practitioners had to overcome." Yve-Alain Bois, Harvard University

"These interviews, full of the rich texture and confusion of an art movement at its inception, began as a "process piece" in mid-1969 when formalism still seemed worth defeating. The artists, tired of talking about turpentine, struggle to extend the rhetoric of form, and as they do so, reveal their roles as theorists and philosophers of a newly cerebral art, Conceptualism. Alberro's helpful introduction frames both Norvell's provocative questions and the surprising responses in a useful book that continues the process of historicizing 20th century art." Caroline Jones, author of Machine in the Studio

"The contemporary interviews collected in this volume shift the ground on which conceptualism in the United States should be understood. The middle months of 1969 were a time of artistic and social unease when artists were anxious to test-and occasionally to declaim, as the interviews demonstrate-ideas in conversation with a sympathetic interlocutor. Patricia Norvell proves to have been an ideal listener. She knew conceptualism well enough to keep the conversations honest, but not so well as to make the artists defensive and wary. The artists had things to say, and were not afraid to put themselves out on a limb." John O'Brian, Professor of Art History, University of British Columbia

"A key document of the late 1960s avant-garde." James Meyer, Emory University

"[This book is] a reminder that the project of Conceptual art and its artists' reasons for refusing the object of art were far from monolithic. The differences that emerge in the interviews are spoken in voices that are still fresh and particular, but each voice and position is tied to the moment of the late 1960s, from stoned mysticism to philosophical idealism, from political optimism to materialist critique." Howard Singerman, author of Art Subjects

Extrait. © Reproduit sur autorisation. Tous droits réservés.

Excerpt

Excerpt from first interview:

Dennis Oppenheim
March 29, 1969

Patricia Norvell: We are obviously in a very active period of expandingand redefining the boundaries of artistic activity. Jack Burnham has recentlysuggested that a the present a systems aesthetic is the major paradigm for thearts, and that we are in a transition from an object-oriented society to asystems-oriented society. [note 1] I'd like to find out what your artisticconcerns are, and how they evolve, and whether you're at all concerned withobjects or formal artistic issues. How do the aims of what you are doing demandhow you present? Do they dictate your presentation and, if not, what choices doyou have in the presentation? And then one of the main problems seems to be thedocumentation which you are very actively involved in. How do you handle that?

Dennis Oppenheim: Okay. Well, let me see, first of all, Burnham'swriting on an alternative to object sculpture I read, and I think that for themost part he's. . . ohh [laughs], what's this, an entourage? [Interrupted bypeople leaving] What was the question? [Laughs]

PN: Mainly I want to know what your concerns are. How you came to themand how. . . ?

DO: Well, the aspect of objects, an object-oriented art, I think, isbeing rigorously examined by young sculptors. I think due to the clarity and thesuccess of some of the past sculptors?[Donald] Judd, [Robert] Morris, and[Carl] Andre?it became clear, or at least evident, that a point had beenreached in a certain kind of work that couldn't really be extended. If much moretime were to be spent on Minimal art, it would just be a redundancy, just amelee of recurring issues. So I felt this very strongly a few years ago and, ah,I felt in my own work a kind of an impasse with the manipulation of manualexertion over the media and the hindrance it seemed to have when placed insideof an exhibition hall. And all of these aspects I think are related andeventually were what overthrew the object, in a sense. [Pause].

Now the approaches other than object-oriented art are vast. You can examine themat this point in the new art?how sculptors are detouring from the preciosity ofobjects and the kind of thinking that's controlled by an object-oriented idea.My first attempt to work outside this range was very much in the bounds of agravitation area. The part of an object that I wanted to get away with or fromwere static protrusions from the ground level. So to defeat that or work aroundthat I dug a wedge inside of a mountain in Oakland. And this did two things. Itfirst of all created an immobile, ephemeral, nonrigid form, but it also createda piece of sculpture that was bound to its location. And in that you're using aviable medi[um] of a living kind of tissue with the earth, what you find in theearth. You have to certainly focus upon the applications of this. But I thinkmore importantly with that indentation or with that hole, there became thequestion of where exactly is the object. If that hole is an object or if a holeis an object, then is it the indentation or the peripheral? And by scribing intoland, where does your piece leave off and where does it begin? So I think thatwas a very important, or is a very important, part about excavated forms.

PN: Do you think any that's true of Michael Heizer's work?

DO: Well, yeah. I think any hole made in the ground, especially anisolated excavation with a large area of land around it. . . Ah, I mean, is yourpiece a large area of land with a hole in it or is it a hole? Is your piece theentire globe with a hole in it? I'm sure it is. I think that's the only way toevaluate it. I mean, it seems reasonable. I know your focus can be twofold.There's the negative area, but there comes a point where the negative area endsand the terrain begins and extends. So it's all part of the media, ah, and evenas you extend your peripheral or periphery onward into different zones andregions, it still applies.

Another aspect of this art that I think is very influential to new sculptors isthe fact that you are making something by taking away rather than adding. Andthis seems to have borne many fruits, pieces involving removals.

PN: You mean pieces that are on a grander scale. Because sculpture usedto be that way?with stone carving.

DO: Well, yeah, there's been a lot said. What's more important, thefinished Greek form of a residue of the chips, or the. . . Is the finished pieceas good as the raw form from which it came? But I don't think artists have everbeen concerned with removals or the residue of an act. And, although a lot ofsculpture, a lot of technique, involved taking away, it wasn't concentratedupon, it wasn't focused upon as being a piece. I mean, like, I have ideas forpieces that involve merely sterilizing a surface, just a mere disinfecting of anarea, as being the conceptual focus point. So this has never really been aconcern in past terms. Although the process of, again, removing or eradicatinghas certainly been an elementary basic of sculpture.

Excerpted from Recording Conceptual Art by Alexander Alberro and Patricia Norvell. Copyright © 2000 by the Regents of the University of California. Excerpted by permission. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

Copyright © 2000 the Regents of the University of California.
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 0-520-22011-0

Détails de l'édition

• Éditeur: University of California Press
• Date d'édition: 2001
• Langue: anglais
• ISBN 10: 0520220110
• ISBN 13: 9780520220119
• Reliure: Broché
• Nombre de pages: 180
• Éditeur: Alberro Alexander, Barry Robert, Norvell Patricia
• Coordonnées du fabricant: non disponible
• Personne responsable: Wiley-VCH GmbH; product_safety@wiley.com; ; Boschstrasse 12; Weinheim; 69469; Allemagne