Exponents and critics of semantic presupposition have almost invariably based their discussion on the ('Standard') definition of presupposition implied by Frege and Strawson. In this study Noel Burton-Roberts argues convincingly against this definition, that leads it to a three-valued semantics. He presents a very simple semantic definition which is weaker, more general and leads to a semantics more easily interpreted as two-valued with gaps. The author shows that a wide range of intuitive facts that eluded the Standard definition follow directly from this ('Revised') definition itself: facts about the presuppositions of compound sentences and modal sentences, about presuppositional conflict and about differences in the logical status of simple sentences suffering from presupposition failure. The book includes a detailed argument that an ambiguity of natural language negation, generally assumed to be necessary to the defence of semantic presupposition, is neither possible nor necessary in a presuppositional semantics. Noel Burton-Roberts has made an authoritative contribution to a debate which has involved philosophers and linguists for many years. His command of the issues, his clarity of exposition and his theoretical insight may well serve to change the boundaries of that debate.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Exponents and critics of semantic presupposition have almost invariably based their discussion on the ('Standard') definition of presupposition implied by Frege and Strawson. In this study Noel Burton-Roberts argues convincingly against this definition, that leads it to a three-valued semantics. He presents a very simple semantic definition which is weaker, more general and leads to a semantics more easily interpreted as two-valued with gaps. The author shows that a wide range of intuitive facts that eluded the Standard definition follow directly from this ('Revised') definition itself: facts about the presuppositions of compound sentences and modal sentences, about presuppositional conflict and about differences in the logical status of simple sentences suffering from presupposition failure. The book includes a detailed argument that an ambiguity of natural language negation, generally assumed to be necessary to the defence of semantic presupposition, is neither possible nor necessary in a presuppositional semantics. Noel Burton-Roberts has made an authoritative contribution to a debate which has involved philosophers and linguists for many years. His command of the issues, his clarity of exposition and his theoretical insight may well serve to change the boundaries of that debate.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : GuthrieBooks, Spring Branch, TX, Etats-Unis
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Sorry, No international shipping on this item.Ex-library hardcover no dj (blue boards) in very nice condition with the usual library markings and attachments. Text block clean and unmarked. Tight binding. N° de réf. du vendeur UTA16A26092
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : PsychoBabel & Skoob Books, Didcot, Royaume-Uni
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Etat de la jaquette : Very Good. Hardcover in very good condition. Includes letter from author to Petr Strawson. Light edge wear on jacket and hardcover. Pages are clean and text is clear throughout. HCW. With Letter from Author. Used. N° de réf. du vendeur 099750
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Grendel Books, ABAA/ILAB, Springfield, MA, Etats-Unis
Hardcover. Etat : Near Fine. Etat de la jaquette : Near Fine. Number 51 in the Cambridge Studies in Linguistics series. First edition. Light foxing on top edge, else near fine in a near fine (foxing on verso) dust jacket. N° de réf. du vendeur 64503
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)