Determining which moral principles should guide political action is a vexing question in political theory. This is especially true when faced with the "toleration paradox": believing that something is morally wrong but also believing that it is wrong to suppress it. In this book, Alex Tuckness argues that John Locke's potential contribution to this debate - what Tuckness terms the "legislative point of view" - has long been obscured by overemphasis on his doctrine of consent. Building on a line of reasoning Locke made explicit in his later writings on religious toleration, Tuckness explores the idea that we should act politically only on those moral principles that a reasonable legislator would endorse; someone, that is, who would avoid enacting measures that could be self-defeating when applied by fallible human beings. Tuckness argues that the legislative point of view has implications that go far beyond the question of religious toleration. Locke suggests an approach to political justification that is a provocative alternative to the utilitarian, contractualist and perfectionist approaches dominating contemporary liberalism. The legislative point of view is relevant to our think
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Alex Tuckness is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Iowa State University.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Labyrinth Books, Princeton, NJ, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 183510
Quantité disponible : 3 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Royaume-Uni
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Very Good. Dust Jacket may NOT BE INCLUDED.CDs may be missing. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book. N° de réf. du vendeur ERICA82906910950356
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)