Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia - Couverture souple

Ciesielski-Carlucci, C.; Kimsma, G. L ; Kushner, Thomasine Kimbrough ; Thomasma, David C.

9780792351863: Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia

Couverture souple

ISBN 10 : 079235186X ISBN 13 : 9780792351863

Editeur : Springer, 2008

Afficher les exemplaires de cette �dition comportant l'ISBN

3 D'occasion

De EUR 196,27

11 Neuf

De EUR 106,99

claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient's unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called "force majeure" 4 which recognizes extenuating circumstances such as conflicts of duty. The acquittal was upheld by the Lower Court of Alkmaar, but revoked by an Amsterdam court of appeal. The case went on to the Supreme Court, but before the Supreme Court's decision was issued, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to clarify the criteria for euthanasia that many within the profession already accepted. The RDMA proposed that physicians be permitted to perform euthanasia provided that a set of procedures had been met. Variously stated, the guidelines contain the following central provisions: Voluntary, competent, explicit, and persistent requests on the part of the - patient; Requests based on full information; - The patient is in a situation of intolerable and hopeless suffering (either - physical or mental); No further acceptable alternatives to euthanasia. All alternatives - acceptable to the patient for relief of suffering having been tried; Consultation with at least one other physician whose judgment can be - 5 expected to be independent. Indirectly, these guidelines became the criteria prosecutors used to decide whether or not to bring charges.

Les informations fournies dans la section � Synopsis � peuvent faire r�f�rence � une autre �dition de ce titre.

�diteur: Springer
Date d'�dition: 2008
Langue: anglais
ISBN 10: 079235186X
ISBN 13: 9780792351863
Reliure: Broch�
Nombre de pages: 608
Coordonn�es du fabricant: non disponible
Personne responsable: CMN Printpool Inh. Mathis Neumann
https://www.also.com/ec/cms5/en_6000/6000/index.jsp

Friedrich-Karl-Str. 9
Hamburg
Allemagne

Acheter D'occasion

�tat : Comme neuf

Afficher cet article

EUR 196,27

Exp�dition �EUR 14,95
Exp�dition depuis Pays-Bas vers Etats-Unis

Ajouter au panier

Acheter neuf

Afficher cet article

EUR 106,99

Exp�dition �EUR 23
Exp�dition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Ajouter au panier

R�sultats de recherche pour Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia

Image fournie par le vendeur

Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia

David C. Thomasma

Edit� par Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands Okt 1998, 1998

ISBN 10 : 079235186X ISBN 13 : 9780792351863

Neuf Taschenbuch

impression � la demande

Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne

�valuation du vendeur 5 sur 5 �toiles

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient's unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called 'force majeure' 4 which recognizes extenuating circumstances such as conflicts of duty. The acquittal was upheld by the Lower Court of Alkmaar, but revoked by an Amsterdam court of appeal. The case went on to the Supreme Court, but before the Supreme Court's decision was issued, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to clarify the criteria for euthanasia that many within the profession already accepted. The RDMA proposed that physicians be permitted to perform euthanasia provided that a set of procedures had been met. Variously stated, the guidelines contain the following central provisions: Voluntary, competent, explicit, and persistent requests on the part of the - patient; Requests based on full information; - The patient is in a situation of intolerable and hopeless suffering (either - physical or mental); No further acceptable alternatives to euthanasia. All alternatives - acceptable to the patient for relief of suffering having been tried; Consultation with at least one other physician whose judgment can be - 5 expected to be independent. Indirectly, these guidelines became the criteria prosecutors used to decide whether or not to bring charges. 604 pp. Englisch. N� de r�f. du vendeur 9780792351863

Contacter le vendeur

Acheter neuf

EUR 106,99

Exp�dition �EUR 23
Exp�dition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Quantit� disponible : 2 disponible(s)

Ajouter au panier

Image fournie par le vendeur

Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia

Thomasma, David C.|Kimbrough Kushner, Thomasine|Kimsma, G.L|Ciesielski-Carlucci, C.

Edit� par Springer Netherlands, 1998

ISBN 10 : 079235186X ISBN 13 : 9780792351863

Neuf Couverture souple

Vendeur : moluna, Greven, Allemagne

�valuation du vendeur 5 sur 5 �toiles

Etat : New. N� de r�f. du vendeur 5968548

Contacter le vendeur

Acheter neuf

EUR 92,27

Exp�dition �EUR 48,99
Exp�dition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Quantit� disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles

Ajouter au panier

Image d'archives

Asking to Die

. Ed(s): Thomasma, David C.; Kushner, Thomasine; Kimsma, G.L. (Free University Amsterdam, Medical Faculty, The Netherlands); Ciesielski-Carlucci, C.

Edit� par Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998

ISBN 10 : 079235186X ISBN 13 : 9780792351863

Neuf Couverture souple

Vendeur : Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irlande

�valuation du vendeur 5 sur 5 �toiles

Etat : New. In the Netherlands, euthanasia is legal, and doctors can openly and intentionally end the life of their patients. This book addresses the debate among Dutch physicians, policy-makers, lawyers, and bioethicists, as well as families, using academic papers as well as personal experiences. Editor(s): Thomasma, David C.; Kushner, Thomasine; Kimsma, G.L. (Free University Amsterdam, Medical Faculty, The Netherlands); Ciesielski-Carlucci, C. Num Pages: 588 pages, biography. BIC Classification: 1DDN; HPQ; MBDC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 195 x 281 x 35. Weight in Grams: 1108. . 1998. Paperback. . . . . N� de r�f. du vendeur V9780792351863

Contacter le vendeur

Acheter neuf

EUR 133,19

Exp�dition �EUR 9,50
Exp�dition depuis Irlande vers Etats-Unis

Quantit� disponible : 15 disponible(s)

Ajouter au panier

Image d'archives

Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia

Ciesielski-Carlucci, C.; Kimsma, G. L; Kushner, Thomasine Kimbrough; Thomasma, David C.

Edit� par Springer, 1998

ISBN 10 : 079235186X ISBN 13 : 9780792351863

Neuf Couverture souple

Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-Uni

�valuation du vendeur 5 sur 5 �toiles

Etat : New. In English. N� de r�f. du vendeur ria9780792351863_new

Contacter le vendeur

Acheter neuf

EUR 127,80

Exp�dition �EUR 17,37
Exp�dition depuis Royaume-Uni vers Etats-Unis

Quantit� disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles

Ajouter au panier

Image fournie par le vendeur

Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia

David C. Thomasma

Edit� par Springer, 1998

ISBN 10 : 079235186X ISBN 13 : 9780792351863

Neuf Taschenbuch

Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne

�valuation du vendeur 5 sur 5 �toiles

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient's unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called 'force majeure' 4 which recognizes extenuating circumstances such as conflicts of duty. The acquittal was upheld by the Lower Court of Alkmaar, but revoked by an Amsterdam court of appeal. The case went on to the Supreme Court, but before the Supreme Court's decision was issued, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to clarify the criteria for euthanasia that many within the profession already accepted. The RDMA proposed that physicians be permitted to perform euthanasia provided that a set of procedures had been met. Variously stated, the guidelines contain the following central provisions: Voluntary, competent, explicit, and persistent requests on the part of the - patient; Requests based on full information; - The patient is in a situation of intolerable and hopeless suffering (either - physical or mental); No further acceptable alternatives to euthanasia. All alternatives - acceptable to the patient for relief of suffering having been tried; Consultation with at least one other physician whose judgment can be - 5 expected to be independent. Indirectly, these guidelines became the criteria prosecutors used to decide whether or not to bring charges. N� de r�f. du vendeur 9780792351863

Contacter le vendeur

Acheter neuf

EUR 120,14

Exp�dition �EUR 42,83
Exp�dition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Quantit� disponible : 1 disponible(s)

Ajouter au panier

Image fournie par le vendeur

Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia

David C. Thomasma (u. a.)

Edit� par Springer, 1998

ISBN 10 : 079235186X ISBN 13 : 9780792351863

Neuf Taschenbuch

impression � la demande

Vendeur : preigu, Osnabr�ck, Allemagne

�valuation du vendeur 5 sur 5 �toiles

Contacter le vendeur

Acheter neuf

EUR 95,70

Exp�dition �EUR 70
Exp�dition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Quantit� disponible : 5 disponible(s)

Ajouter au panier

Image fournie par le vendeur

Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia

David C. Thomasma

Edit� par Springer Netherlands, Springer Okt 1998, 1998

ISBN 10 : 079235186X ISBN 13 : 9780792351863

Neuf Taschenbuch

impression � la demande

Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne

�valuation du vendeur 5 sur 5 �toiles

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient�s unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called 'force majeure' 4 which recognizes extenuating circumstances such as conflicts of duty. The acquittal was upheld by the Lower Court of Alkmaar, but revoked by an Amsterdam court of appeal. The case went on to the Supreme Court, but before the Supreme Court's decision was issued, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to clarify the criteria for euthanasia that many within the profession already accepted. The RDMA proposed that physicians be permitted to perform euthanasia provided that a set of procedures had been met. Variously stated, the guidelines contain the following central provisions: Voluntary, competent, explicit, and persistent requests on the part of the � patient; Requests based on full information; � The patient is in a situation of intolerable and hopeless suffering (either � physical or mental); No further acceptable alternatives to euthanasia. All alternatives � acceptable to the patient for relief of suffering having been tried; Consultation with at least one other physician whose judgment can be � 5 expected to be independent. Indirectly, these guidelines became the criteria prosecutors used to decide whether or not to bring charges.Springer-Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 604 pp. Englisch. N� de r�f. du vendeur 9780792351863

Contacter le vendeur