Articles liés à Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review - Couverture souple

 
9781107662964: Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

Synopsis

Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim that subjecting counter-terrorism measures to judicial review is crucial for maintaining a jurisdiction's principles of constitutionalism. This volume brings together voices from all sides of the debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia. It does not attempt to 'resolve' the argument but rather to explore it in all its dimensions. The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles.

Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.

À propos des auteurs

Fergal F. Davis is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Law at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Fiona de Londras is a Professor of Law at the University of Durham where she is also Co-Director of Durham Human Rights Centre.

Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.