Explore the arguments shaping early 20th?century public policy. This collection presents concise briefs on twenty?five pressing questions, each framed by a clear proposition and supported with selective references. The book offers a balanced view by presenting both affirmative and negative positions, helping readers understand the key points in public debate.
Two framing paragraphs outline why these topics mattered, what facts were widely recognized, and where the main disagreements lie. The core sections feature: a brief for each topic, followed by main arguments from both sides and then a curated list of sources readers can consult for deeper study.
- A structured, topic?by?topic format that highlights the issues, arguments, and references.
- Clear exposition of the main positions, with attention to how opinions evolved in the era.
- A comprehensive reference apparatus to guide further reading in libraries and archives.
- A useful resource for students, researchers, and anyone studying the history of public policy and debate.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Forgotten Books, London, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : New. Print on Demand. This book examines the arguments surrounding a proposal to make the naturalization laws of the United States more stringent. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there was a huge surge of immigration in the United States. Many politicians argued for more stringent immigration policies, including a literacy requirement. This book explores the arguments for and against such a policy. The author notes that one of the main arguments in favor of more stringent naturalization laws was that immigrants were not being properly assimilated into American society. They argued that immigrants were not learning English, were not adopting American customs, and were not becoming familiar with American history and government. They also argued that immigrants were bringing with them their own political and social problems, such as poverty, crime, and political radicalism. The author also notes that there were many arguments against more stringent naturalization laws. Opponents argued that such laws would be discriminatory and would prevent many worthy immigrants from becoming citizens. They also argued that such laws would not be effective in preventing the problems that proponents claimed were caused by immigration. In the end, the author concludes that the arguments against more stringent naturalization laws were more persuasive than the arguments in favor. The author argues that more stringent naturalization laws would have been discriminatory and would not have been effective in preventing the problems that proponents claimed were caused by immigration. This book is a reproduction of an important historical work, digitally reconstructed using state-of-the-art technology to preserve the original format. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in the book. print-on-demand item. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781334460135_0
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur LW-9781334460135
Quantité disponible : 15 disponible(s)
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur LW-9781334460135
Quantité disponible : 15 disponible(s)