This book considers the impact of judicial avoidance: What happens when courts leave parts of the merits of the case, or their whole, undecided for different reasons?
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Carolina Alves das Chagas is Programme Coordinator at the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Austria.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. In. N° de réf. du vendeur ria9781509961535_new
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : Books Puddle, New York, NY, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. pages cm. N° de réf. du vendeur 26397678803
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Etats-Unis
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided? It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:- Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?- How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately?The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline. From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying formal balancing to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference. The formal balancing methodology is based on Alexys principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781509961535
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Majestic Books, Hounslow, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. Print on Demand pages cm. N° de réf. du vendeur 398698252
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Allemagne
Etat : New. PRINT ON DEMAND pages cm. N° de réf. du vendeur 18397678809
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Revaluation Books, Exeter, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : Brand New. 272 pages. 9.21x6.14x1.00 inches. In Stock. N° de réf. du vendeur x-1509961534
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : CitiRetail, Stevenage, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided? It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:- Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?- How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately?The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline. From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying formal balancing to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference. The formal balancing methodology is based on Alexys principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781509961535
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)