The digital edition of all books may be viewed on our website before purchase. Excerpt from Notes and Queries
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books.
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works. This text has been digitally restored from a historical edition. Some errors may persist, however we consider it worth publishing due to the work's historical value.The digital edition of all books may be viewed on our website before purchase.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
A postle, viz., 24 February, 12967, which was aS unday that year. The Parliament duly met on that date, and though little is known of its deliberations, theE arls of Norfolk and Hereford then refused to lead the campaign in Gascony, on the ground that the king was not going thither in person ;and it was on this occasion that the supposed punning allusion to Bigot sname occurred. King Edward himself was still atS alisbury on 7M arch, when the Archbishop Winchelsey had audience there to discuss the situation, and on this occasion, it seems, a modus vivendi was arranged. Reasonable consideration of these plain facts leads to the opinion that there was a Parliament atS alisbury in response to the writ of summons in question; that those who were omitted from the summons were outlaws, and had consequently no right to receive writs; that this Parliament discussed theB ull and the general situation; that King Edward, having taken counsel and heard the views of the lords temporal, subsequently came to an informal understanding, for the existence of which there is good evidence, with the prime mover in the matter, Archbishop Winchelsey; and that the supposed Parliament atS alisbury of 21 September, 1297, at which date the king was in Flanders, is a myth arising from a mistake very easily to be made. The great probability that this writ produced a Parliament has an important bearing on the regularity of the writ itself; especially so since those were present who would have been glad to take exception to the legality of the summons if they could have done so; and, duly regarded in all its bearings and its peculiar circumstances, the validity of this writ of 26 January, 25 Edw. I., notwithstanding the opinions of the eminent authorities named, seems to be more easily defended than opposed. HAMILTON HALL. THE TIMES, 9NOVEMBER, 1796. The facsimile reprint of the Times of t
(Typographical errors above are due to OCR software and don't occur in the book.)
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
EUR 28,97 expédition depuis Royaume-Uni vers France
Destinations, frais et délaisVendeur : Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Royaume-Uni
hardcover. Etat : New. New. book. N° de réf. du vendeur ERICA80015283706006
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)