In paediatrics, clinicians and parents sometimes disagree about the appropriate medical treatment for a child. Parents can prefer an option that differs from the clinician’s recommendation. When should the parents’ decision about their child’s medical treatment be overridden?
This book explores ethical decision-making when clinicians and parents disagree about medical treatment for a child. It develops and explores a concept called the zone of parental discretion: an ethical tool that aims to balance children’s wellbeing and parents’ rights to make medical decisions for their children. Written by experienced clinical ethicists and paediatric clinicians, this book offers ethical analysis and practical guidance based on real-life clinical cases. It aims to assist doctors, nurses, allied health professionals and clinical ethics staff to deal with these ethically challenging situations.
The book is divided into five parts:
1. An ethical tool: the zone of parental discretion
2. Roles of doctors and parents in decision-making
3. Clinicians encountering parental refusals
4. Clinicians encountering parental requests for treatment
5. Clinicians encountering parental requests for interventions on healthy children
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Rosalind McDougall is an ethicist at the Children’s Bioethics Centre, Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, and at the Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne. She studied philosophy, genetics and bioethics at the University of Melbourne and the University of Oxford, and has published widely on issues in clinical ethics and reproductive ethics. Her research focuses on paediatrics and parenthood. Rosalind has been involved in clinical ethics case consultation in Australian hospitals since 2008, and is currently a member of the Clinical Ethics Response Group at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne. Clare Delany worked for many years as a physiotherapist but now researches and practices in clinical ethics and clinical education. Clare is an Associate Professor in the Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine at the University of Melbourne and a Clinical Ethicist at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne. At the University, Clare teaches in professional ethics, qualitative research and critical thinking and reasoning in health care. At the Children’s Bioethics Centre, Clare is a member of the Clinical Ethics Response Group and is involved in education, consultations and research in paediatric clinical ethics. Lynn Gillam is an experienced ethicist, originally trained in philosophy (MA, 1988, Oxon) and bioethics (PhD, Monash, 2000). Lynn is the Academic Director of the Children’s Bioethics Centre at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne. She is also Professor in Health Ethics at the University of Melbourne, in the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health. Lynn works in clinical ethics case consultation at the Royal Children’s Hospital, and has been involved in over 200 ethics consultations over the past 10 years. At the Royal Children’s Hospital, she also provides policy advice and leads research into a range of issues in paediatric clinical ethics.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Etats-Unis
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. In paediatrics, clinicians and parents sometimes disagree about the appropriate medical treatment for a child. Parents can prefer an option that differs from the clinicians recommendation. When should the parents decision about their childs medical treatment be overridden?\nThis book explores ethical decision-making when clinicians and parents disagree about medical treatment for a child. It develops and explores a concept called the zone of parental discretion: an ethical tool that aims to balance childrens wellbeing and parents rights to make medical decisions for their children. Written by experienced clinical ethicists and paediatric clinicians, this book offers ethical analysis and practical guidance based on real-life clinical cases. It aims to assist doctors, nurses, allied health professionals and clinical ethics staff to deal with these ethically challenging situations.\nThe book is divided into five parts: 1. An ethical tool: the zone of parental discretion 2. Roles of doctors and parents in decision-making 3. Clinicians encountering parental refusals 4. Clinicians encountering parental requests for treatment 5. Clinicians encountering parental requests for interventions on healthy children\nFor more information visit: \nIn the media\n\nDr Ros McDougall on ABC Radio National, Life Matters with Cassie McCullaghon_9 September 2016 Listen to interview.\nWhen doctors and parents disagree: clinical best not always best for family, The Melbourne Newsroom, 9 September 2016 Read article.\nWhen parents disagree with doctors on a childs treatment, who should have the final say?, The Conversation, 7 September 2016 Read article.\n In paediatrics, clinicians and parents sometimes disagree about the appropriate medical treatment for a child. When should the parents' decision about their child's medical treatment be overridden? This book explores ethical decision-making when clinicians and parents disagree about medical treatment for a child. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781760020590
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : CitiRetail, Stevenage, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. In paediatrics, clinicians and parents sometimes disagree about the appropriate medical treatment for a child. Parents can prefer an option that differs from the clinicians recommendation. When should the parents decision about their childs medical treatment be overridden?\nThis book explores ethical decision-making when clinicians and parents disagree about medical treatment for a child. It develops and explores a concept called the zone of parental discretion: an ethical tool that aims to balance childrens wellbeing and parents rights to make medical decisions for their children. Written by experienced clinical ethicists and paediatric clinicians, this book offers ethical analysis and practical guidance based on real-life clinical cases. It aims to assist doctors, nurses, allied health professionals and clinical ethics staff to deal with these ethically challenging situations.\nThe book is divided into five parts: 1. An ethical tool: the zone of parental discretion 2. Roles of doctors and parents in decision-making 3. Clinicians encountering parental refusals 4. Clinicians encountering parental requests for treatment 5. Clinicians encountering parental requests for interventions on healthy children\nFor more information visit: \nIn the media\n\nDr Ros McDougall on ABC Radio National, Life Matters with Cassie McCullaghon_9 September 2016 Listen to interview.\nWhen doctors and parents disagree: clinical best not always best for family, The Melbourne Newsroom, 9 September 2016 Read article.\nWhen parents disagree with doctors on a childs treatment, who should have the final say?, The Conversation, 7 September 2016 Read article.\n In paediatrics, clinicians and parents sometimes disagree about the appropriate medical treatment for a child. When should the parents' decision about their child's medical treatment be overridden? This book explores ethical decision-making when clinicians and parents disagree about medical treatment for a child. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781760020590
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australie
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. In paediatrics, clinicians and parents sometimes disagree about the appropriate medical treatment for a child. Parents can prefer an option that differs from the clinicians recommendation. When should the parents decision about their childs medical treatment be overridden?\nThis book explores ethical decision-making when clinicians and parents disagree about medical treatment for a child. It develops and explores a concept called the zone of parental discretion: an ethical tool that aims to balance childrens wellbeing and parents rights to make medical decisions for their children. Written by experienced clinical ethicists and paediatric clinicians, this book offers ethical analysis and practical guidance based on real-life clinical cases. It aims to assist doctors, nurses, allied health professionals and clinical ethics staff to deal with these ethically challenging situations.\nThe book is divided into five parts: 1. An ethical tool: the zone of parental discretion 2. Roles of doctors and parents in decision-making 3. Clinicians encountering parental refusals 4. Clinicians encountering parental requests for treatment 5. Clinicians encountering parental requests for interventions on healthy children\nFor more information visit: \nIn the media\n\nDr Ros McDougall on ABC Radio National, Life Matters with Cassie McCullaghon_9 September 2016 Listen to interview.\nWhen doctors and parents disagree: clinical best not always best for family, The Melbourne Newsroom, 9 September 2016 Read article.\nWhen parents disagree with doctors on a childs treatment, who should have the final say?, The Conversation, 7 September 2016 Read article.\n In paediatrics, clinicians and parents sometimes disagree about the appropriate medical treatment for a child. When should the parents' decision about their child's medical treatment be overridden? This book explores ethical decision-making when clinicians and parents disagree about medical treatment for a child. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781760020590
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)