Articles liés à Making the Law Explicit: The Normativity of Legal Argumentat...
Synopsis
Legal argumentation consists in the interpretation of texts. Therefore, it has a natural connection to the philosophy of language. Central issues of this connection, however, lack a clear answer. For instance, how much freedom do judges have in applying the law? How are the literal and the purposive approaches related to one another? How can we distinguish between applying the law and making the law?
This book provides answers by means of a complex and detailed theory of literal meaning. A new legal method is introduced, namely the further development of the law. It is so far unknown in Anglo-American jurisprudence, but it is shown that this new method helps in solving some of the most crucial puzzles in jurisprudence.
At its centre the book addresses legal indeterminism and refutes linguistic-philosophical reasons for indeterminacy. It spells out the normative character of interpretation as emphasized by Raz and, with the help of Robert Brandom's normative pragmatics, it is shown that the relativism of interpretation from a normative perspective does not at all justify scepticism. On the contrary, it supports the claim that legal argumentation can be objective, and maintains that statements on the meaning of a statute can be right or wrong, and take on inter-subjective validity accordingly.
This book breaks new ground in transferring Brandom's philosophy to legal theoretical problems and presents an original and exciting analysis of the semantic argument in legal argumentation. It was the recipient of the European Award for Legal Theory in 2002.
'This book represents, on the one hand, a reception of Robert Brandom's important theory including applications of this theory in the field of legal philosophy and, on the other, an exploration of the limits of an appeal in legal interpretation to the text. The enquiry thereby impinges upon the central juridico-philosophical themes of meaning, objectivity, and normativity. The author's work counts as a significant contribution to analytical jurisprudence and is deserving of a wide readership.' Robert Alexy, Professor for Public Law and Legal Philosophy, Kiel.
'Klatt focuses on a very profound theory of concept formation and uses this theory in a creative way to solve classical problems of legal argumentation.' Aleksander Peczenik
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
À propos de l?auteur
Matthias Klatt is Juliana Cuyler Matthews Junior Research Fellow in Law at New College, Oxford University.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Acheter neuf
Afficher cet article
EUR 125,05
EUR 3,43 expédition vers Etats-Unis
Destinations, frais et délaisRésultats de recherche pour Making the Law Explicit: The Normativity of Legal Argumentat...
Image d'archives
Making the Law Explicit: The Normativity of Legal Argumentation (European Academy of Legal Theory Series)
Vendeur : Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, Etats-Unis
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur ABLIING23Mar2912160233343
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image d'archives
Making the Law Explicit: The Normativity of Legal Argumentation (European Academy of Legal Theory Series)
Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. In. N° de réf. du vendeur ria9781841134918_new
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image d'archives
Making the Law Explicit (Hardcover)
Edité par
Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, Oxford, 2008
ISBN 10 : 1841134910
ISBN 13 : 9781841134918
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Etats-Unis
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Hardcover. Etat : new. Hardcover. Legal argumentation consists in the interpretation of texts. Therefore, it has a natural connection to the philosophy of language. Central issues of this connection, however, lack a clear answer. For instance, how much freedom do judges have in applying the law? How are the literal and the purposive approaches related to one another? How can we distinguish between applying the law and making the law?This book provides answers by means of a complex and detailed theory of literal meaning. A new legal method is introduced, namely the further development of the law. It is so far unknown in Anglo-American jurisprudence, but it is shown that this new method helps in solving some of the most crucial puzzles in jurisprudence.At its centre the book addresses legal indeterminism and refutes linguistic-philosophical reasons for indeterminacy. It spells out the normative character of interpretation as emphasized by Raz and, with the help of Robert Brandom's normative pragmatics, it is shown that the relativism of interpretation from a normative perspective does not at all justify scepticism. On the contrary, it supports the claim that legal argumentation can be objective, and maintains that statements on the meaning of a statute can be right or wrong, and take on inter-subjective validity accordingly.This book breaks new ground in transferring Brandom's philosophy to legal theoretical problems and presents an original and exciting analysis of the semantic argument in legal argumentation. It was the recipient of the European Award for Legal Theory in 2002.'This book represents, on the one hand, a reception of Robert Brandom's important theory including applications of this theory in the field of legal philosophy and, on the other, an exploration of the limits of an appeal in legal interpretation to the text. The enquiry thereby impinges upon the central juridico-philosophical themes of meaning, objectivity, and normativity. The author's work counts as a significant contribution to analytical jurisprudence and is deserving of a wide readership.' Robert Alexy, Professor for Public Law and Legal Philosophy, Kiel.'Klatt focuses on a very profound theory of concept formation and uses this theory in a creative way to solve classical problems of legal argumentation.' Aleksander Peczenik This book considers Robert Brandom's philosophy and presents an original and exciting analysis of the semantic argument in legal argumentation. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781841134918
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image d'archives
MAKING THE LAW EXPLICIT
Vendeur : Speedyhen, London, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : NEW. N° de réf. du vendeur NW9781841134918
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
Making the Law Explicit: The Normativity of Legal Argumentation
impression à la demandeVendeur : moluna, Greven, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 4 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. This book considers Robert Brandom s philosophy and presents an original and exciting analysis of the semantic argument in legal argumentation.Über den AutorMatthias Klatt is Juliana Cuyler Matthews Junior Research Fellow in Law. N° de réf. du vendeur 117462843
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image d'archives
Making The Law Explicit: The Normativity Of Legal Argumentation
Vendeur : Revaluation Books, Exeter, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Hardcover. Etat : Brand New. 303 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock. N° de réf. du vendeur x-1841134910
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Image d'archives
Making the Law Explicit (Hardcover)
Edité par
Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, Oxford, 2008
ISBN 10 : 1841134910
ISBN 13 : 9781841134918
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : CitiRetail, Stevenage, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Hardcover. Etat : new. Hardcover. Legal argumentation consists in the interpretation of texts. Therefore, it has a natural connection to the philosophy of language. Central issues of this connection, however, lack a clear answer. For instance, how much freedom do judges have in applying the law? How are the literal and the purposive approaches related to one another? How can we distinguish between applying the law and making the law?This book provides answers by means of a complex and detailed theory of literal meaning. A new legal method is introduced, namely the further development of the law. It is so far unknown in Anglo-American jurisprudence, but it is shown that this new method helps in solving some of the most crucial puzzles in jurisprudence.At its centre the book addresses legal indeterminism and refutes linguistic-philosophical reasons for indeterminacy. It spells out the normative character of interpretation as emphasized by Raz and, with the help of Robert Brandom's normative pragmatics, it is shown that the relativism of interpretation from a normative perspective does not at all justify scepticism. On the contrary, it supports the claim that legal argumentation can be objective, and maintains that statements on the meaning of a statute can be right or wrong, and take on inter-subjective validity accordingly.This book breaks new ground in transferring Brandom's philosophy to legal theoretical problems and presents an original and exciting analysis of the semantic argument in legal argumentation. It was the recipient of the European Award for Legal Theory in 2002.'This book represents, on the one hand, a reception of Robert Brandom's important theory including applications of this theory in the field of legal philosophy and, on the other, an exploration of the limits of an appeal in legal interpretation to the text. The enquiry thereby impinges upon the central juridico-philosophical themes of meaning, objectivity, and normativity. The author's work counts as a significant contribution to analytical jurisprudence and is deserving of a wide readership.' Robert Alexy, Professor for Public Law and Legal Philosophy, Kiel.'Klatt focuses on a very profound theory of concept formation and uses this theory in a creative way to solve classical problems of legal argumentation.' Aleksander Peczenik This book considers Robert Brandom's philosophy and presents an original and exciting analysis of the semantic argument in legal argumentation. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781841134918
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)