Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. In competition cases, by contrast, economists are familiar figures in the courtroom and the language of economics is scattered throughout the judgments of even the highest courts. One might expect, therefore, that refusals to license intellectual property would generate the same fruitful symbiosis between law and economics when those refusals surface in competition proceedings. This however, has not been how the law on this subject has developed in most jurisdictions. Courts and enforcement agencies faced with a unilateral refusal to license have instead tended to retreat into sketchily articulated black letter rules and presumptions which then have to be fenced off from the rest of competition law by economically irrelevant qualifications and distinctions based on private law categorisations of, and rationales for, individual intellectual property rights. This bypassing of case-by-case analysis in favour of more traditional modes of legal reasoning is not entirely the fault of lawyers. Economists have contributed to this state of affairs by urging judges and regulators to convert empirically undernourished theories about the proper role of intellectual property in a market economy into rules of law and evidentiary presumptions intended to be binding in future cases. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Ian Eagles holds a chair in law at Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand and is Visiting Professor at the University of New South Wales.
Louise Longdin holds a chair in law at Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand and is a Visiting Professor at the University of New South Wales. She is is also Director of the Competition Law and Policy Institute of New Zealand.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Wallace Books, Portland, OR, Etats-Unis
Soft cover. Etat : As New. Unread softcover book in As New condition. We ship promptly from the United States and in a box. N° de réf. du vendeur 36,075x
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Wallace Books, Portland, OR, Etats-Unis
Soft cover. Etat : Fine. Softcover book in Fine condition. Pages are completely clean and contain no additional markings. NOT a former library book. We ship promptly from the United States and in a box! N° de réf. du vendeur 35,036x
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Daedalus Books, Portland, OR, Etats-Unis
Paperback. Etat : Fine. 8vo ; 270 pages. N° de réf. du vendeur 256060
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : PsychoBabel & Skoob Books, Didcot, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : Very Good. Paperback in excellent condition throughout, with no notable faults. TS. Used. N° de réf. du vendeur 607632
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Kloof Booksellers & Scientia Verlag, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas
Etat : as new. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2011. Paperback. 298 pp. English text. Condition : as new. - Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. In competition cases, by contrast, economists are familiar figures in the courtroom and the language of economics is scattered throughout the judgments of even the highest courts. One might expect, therefore, that refusals to license intellectual property would generate the same fruitful symbiosis between law and economics when those refusals surface in competition proceedings. This, however, has not been how the law on this subject has developed in most jurisdictions. Courts and enforcement agencies faced with a unilateral refusal to license have instead tended to retreat into sketchily articulated black letter rules and presumptions, which then have to be fenced off from the rest of competition law by economically irrelevant qualifications and distinctions based on private law categorizations of, and rationales for, individual intellectual property rights. This bypassing of case-by-case analysis in favor of more traditional modes of legal reasoning is not entirely the fault of lawyers. Economists have contributed to this state of affairs by urging judges and regulators to convert empirically undernourished theories about the proper role of intellectual property in a market economy into rules of law and evidentiary presumptions intended to be binding in future cases. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book. Condition : as new copy. ISBN 9781841138732. Keywords : RECHT, Intellectual property. N° de réf. du vendeur 71343
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Basi6 International, Irving, TX, Etats-Unis
Etat : Brand New. New. US edition. Expediting shipping for all USA and Europe orders excluding PO Box. Excellent Customer Service. N° de réf. du vendeur ABEOCT25-279606
Quantité disponible : 3 disponible(s)
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L0-9781841138732
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. In. N° de réf. du vendeur ria9781841138732_new
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L0-9781841138732
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : CitiRetail, Stevenage, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. In competition cases, by contrast, economists are familiar figures in the courtroom and the language of economics is scattered throughout the judgments of even the highest courts. One might expect, therefore, that refusals to license intellectual property would generate the same fruitful symbiosis between law and economics when those refusals surface in competition proceedings. This however, has not been how the law on this subject has developed in most jurisdictions. Courts and enforcement agencies faced with a unilateral refusal to license have instead tended to retreat into sketchily articulated black letter rules and presumptions which then have to be fenced off from the rest of competition law by economically irrelevant qualifications and distinctions based on private law categorisations of, and rationales for, individual intellectual property rights. This bypassing of case-by-case analysis in favour of more traditional modes of legal reasoning is not entirely the fault of lawyers. Economists have contributed to this state of affairs by urging judges and regulators to convert empirically undernourished theories about the proper role of intellectual property in a market economy into rules of law and evidentiary presumptions intended to be binding in future cases. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book. Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9781841138732
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)