Articles liés à The "(no) negative evidence" problem: Nativist...
The "(no) negative evidence" problem: Nativist and social interactionist views on how children recover from grammatical errors - Couverture souple
Synopsis
Seminar paper from the year 2019 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, University of Bonn (Institut für Anglistik, Amerikanistik und Keltologie), course: Language Acquisition - Psycholinguistik, language: English, abstract: This paper aims at exploring how the views on language acquisition have developed over time, where they conflict each other and whether it is possible to position oneself on either side. The "nature vs nurture" debate is an everlasting discussion, not only in the area of linguistics, but science in general. This is what makes it particularly interesting because there is always new information to expect. Furthermore, it is an issue not limited to academic discourse only, but one that appears in everyday conversation. An interesting aspect of language acquisition, more specifically the knowledge of language, is the question if children arrive at such knowledge by the mere exposure to "positive evidence", i.e. the language of adults they are surrounded with, or if negative evidence also has an impact, i.e. children's knowledge of language is based on explicit or implicit feedback to whether an utterance was in some way incorrect. The two terms will be defined and looked into in more detail in the second chapter. In the following, the correlation between the "nature vs nurture" debate and language acquisition will be explained first. The respective chapter provides a brief insight into how the nativist approach developed, mainly based on Chomsky's (1988) notion of "Universal Grammar" (UG), and the type of criticism it brought along. It further explains the connection between the respective theories and the grammatical aspect of language acquisition. In the last section, the main problems of experience-based language learning will be displayed and defined. The third chapter starts with a section dedicated to where the particular view that humans need innate structures for a correct knowledge of language stems from. It continues with a detailed look on the "(no) negative evidence" problem. The (non-)existence of negative evidence and which role it plays in terms of language acquisition will be explored from different standpoints by nativists as well as non-nativists.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
À propos de la quatrième de couverture
Seminar paper from the year 2019 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, University of Bonn (Institut für Anglistik, Amerikanistik und Keltologie), course: Language Acquisition - Psycholinguistik, language: English, abstract: This paper aims at exploring how the views on language acquisition have developed over time, where they conflict each other and whether it is possible to position oneself on either side. The ¿nature vs nurture¿ debate is an everlasting discussion, not only in the area of linguistics, but science in general. This is what makes it particularly interesting because there is always new information to expect. Furthermore, it is an issue not limited to academic discourse only, but one that appears in everyday conversation. An interesting aspect of language acquisition, more specifically the knowledge of language, is the question if children arrive at such knowledge by the mere exposure to ¿positive evidence¿, i.e. the language of adults they are surrounded with, or if negative evidence also has an impact, i.e. children¿s knowledge of language is based on explicit or implicit feedback to whether an utterance was in some way incorrect. The two terms will be defined and looked into in more detail in the second chapter. In the following, the correlation between the ¿nature vs nurture¿ debate and language acquisition will be explained first. The respective chapter provides a brief insight into how the nativist approach developed, mainly based on Chomsky¿s (1988) notion of ¿Universal Grammar¿ (UG), and the type of criticism it brought along. It further explains the connection between the respective theories and the grammatical aspect of language acquisition. In the last section, the main problems of experience-based language learning will be displayed and defined. The third chapter starts with a section dedicated to where the particular view that humans need innate structures for a correct knowledge of language stems from. It continues with a detailed look on the ¿(no) negative evidence¿ problem. The (non-)existence of negative evidence and which role it plays in terms of language acquisition will be explored from different standpoints by nativists as well as non-nativists.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Résultats de recherche pour The "(no) negative evidence" problem: Nativist...
Image d'archives
The "(no) negative evidence" problem: Nativist and social interactionist views on how children recover from grammatical errors
Vendeur : California Books, Miami, FL, Etats-Unis
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur I-9783346371799
Acheter neuf
EUR 23,61
Livraison gratuite
Expédition nationale : Etats-Unis
Expédition nationale : Etats-Unis
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image fournie par le vendeur
The "(no) negative evidence" problem: Nativist and social interactionist views on how children recover from grammatical errors
impression à la demandeVendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2019 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, University of Bonn (Institut für Anglistik, Amerikanistik und Keltologie), course: Language Acquisition - Psycholinguistik, language: English, abstract: This paper aims at exploring how the views on language acquisition have developed over time, where they conflict each other and whether it is possible to position oneself on either side.The 'nature vs nurture' debate is an everlasting discussion, not only in the area of linguistics, but science in general. This is what makes it particularly interesting because there is always new information to expect. Furthermore, it is an issue not limited to academic discourse only, but one that appears in everyday conversation.An interesting aspect of language acquisition, more specifically the knowledge of language, is the question if children arrive at such knowledge by the mere exposure to 'positive evidence', i.e. the language of adults they are surrounded with, or if negative evidence also has an impact, i.e. children's knowledge of language is based on explicit or implicit feedback to whether an utterance was in some way incorrect. The two terms will be defined and looked into in more detail in the second chapter.In the following, the correlation between the 'nature vs nurture' debate and language acquisition will be explained first. The respective chapter provides a brief insight into how the nativist approach developed, mainly based on Chomsky's (1988) notion of 'Universal Grammar' (UG), and the type of criticism it brought along. It further explains the connection between the respective theories and the grammatical aspect of language acquisition. In the last section, the main problems of experience-based language learning will be displayed and defined.The third chapter starts with a section dedicated to where the particular view that humans need innate structures for a correct knowledge of language stems from. It continues with a detailed look on the '(no) negative evidence' problem. The (non-)existence of negative evidence and which role it plays in terms of language acquisition will be explored from different standpoints by nativists as well as non-nativists. 20 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783346371799
Acheter neuf
EUR 15,95
Expédition à EUR 23
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
"The \"(no) negative evidence\" problem: Nativist and social interactionist views on how children recover from grammatical errors"
Edité par
GRIN Verlag, GRIN Verlag Mai 2021, 2021
ISBN 10 : 3346371794
ISBN 13 : 9783346371799
Neuf
Taschenbuch
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2019 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, University of Bonn (Institut für Anglistik, Amerikanistik und Keltologie), course: Language Acquisition - Psycholinguistik, language: English, abstract: This paper aims at exploring how the views on language acquisition have developed over time, where they conflict each other and whether it is possible to position oneself on either side. The ¿nature vs nurture¿ debate is an everlasting discussion, not only in the area of linguistics, but science in general. This is what makes it particularly interesting because there is always new information to expect. Furthermore, it is an issue not limited to academic discourse only, but one that appears in everyday conversation. An interesting aspect of language acquisition, more specifically the knowledge of language, is the question if children arrive at such knowledge by the mere exposure to ¿positive evidence¿, i.e. the language of adults they are surrounded with, or if negative evidence also has an impact, i.e. children¿s knowledge of language is based on explicit or implicit feedback to whether an utterance was in some way incorrect. The two terms will be defined and looked into in more detail in the second chapter. In the following, the correlation between the ¿nature vs nurture¿ debate and language acquisition will be explained first. The respective chapter provides a brief insight into how the nativist approach developed, mainly based on Chomsky¿s (1988) notion of ¿Universal Grammar¿ (UG), and the type of criticism it brought along. It further explains the connection between the respective theories and the grammatical aspect of language acquisition. In the last section, the main problems of experience-based language learning will be displayed and defined. The third chapter starts with a section dedicated to where the particular view that humans need innate structures for a correct knowledge of language stems from. It continues with a detailed look on the ¿(no) negative evidence¿ problem. The (non-)existence of negative evidence and which role it plays in terms of language acquisition will be explored from different standpoints by nativists as well as non-nativists. 20 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783346371799
Acheter neuf
EUR 15,95
Expédition à EUR 60
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
The "(no) negative evidence" problem: Nativist and social interactionist views on how children recover from grammatical errors
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2019 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, University of Bonn (Institut für Anglistik, Amerikanistik und Keltologie), course: Language Acquisition - Psycholinguistik, language: English, abstract: This paper aims at exploring how the views on language acquisition have developed over time, where they conflict each other and whether it is possible to position oneself on either side.The 'nature vs nurture' debate is an everlasting discussion, not only in the area of linguistics, but science in general. This is what makes it particularly interesting because there is always new information to expect. Furthermore, it is an issue not limited to academic discourse only, but one that appears in everyday conversation.An interesting aspect of language acquisition, more specifically the knowledge of language, is the question if children arrive at such knowledge by the mere exposure to 'positive evidence', i.e. the language of adults they are surrounded with, or if negative evidence also has an impact, i.e. children's knowledge of language is based on explicit or implicit feedback to whether an utterance was in some way incorrect. The two terms will be defined and looked into in more detail in the second chapter.In the following, the correlation between the 'nature vs nurture' debate and language acquisition will be explained first. The respective chapter provides a brief insight into how the nativist approach developed, mainly based on Chomsky's (1988) notion of 'Universal Grammar' (UG), and the type of criticism it brought along. It further explains the connection between the respective theories and the grammatical aspect of language acquisition. In the last section, the main problems of experience-based language learning will be displayed and defined.The third chapter starts with a section dedicated to where the particular view that humans need innate structures for a correct knowledge of language stems from. It continues with a detailed look on the '(no) negative evidence' problem. The (non-)existence of negative evidence and which role it plays in terms of language acquisition will be explored from different standpoints by nativists as well as non-nativists. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783346371799
Acheter neuf
EUR 15,95
Expédition à EUR 60,23
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
The "(no) negative evidence" problem: Nativist and social interactionist views on how children recover from grammatical errors
impression à la demandeVendeur : preigu, Osnabrück, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. The "(no) negative evidence" problem: Nativist and social interactionist views on how children recover from grammatical errors | Bünyamin Yuvarlak | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2021 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783346371799 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. N° de réf. du vendeur 120027813
Acheter neuf
EUR 15,95
Expédition à EUR 70
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis
Quantité disponible : 5 disponible(s)