The credit scoring methodology is increasingly used in companies and business field. This method once in the 1950’s introduced has developed and cover new branches today, such as mailing and fraud. This methodology is one of the most important to manage risks and estimate the probability of default of a client by borrowing money. There are several statistical methods to select the relevant characteristics for the scoring model such as linear regression models and classification tree and the goal in this study is to compare the two most used statistical methods on credit scoring: logistic regression - with categorized and raw data - and discriminant analysis, as also their pros and cons. The analysis was made using a dataset from METRO Cash&Carry enabling the application of the methods on real data. The logistic regression with a Scorecard example and the discriminant analysis have a similar performance on estimating the probability of default from a client, despite the methodologies being different the approaches are similar and the results shown a small difference between them.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
The credit scoring methodology is increasingly used in companies and business field. This method once in the 1950’s introduced has developed and cover new branches today, such as mailing and fraud. This methodology is one of the most important to manage risks and estimate the probability of default of a client by borrowing money. There are several statistical methods to select the relevant characteristics for the scoring model such as linear regression models and classification tree and the goal in this study is to compare the two most used statistical methods on credit scoring: logistic regression - with categorized and raw data - and discriminant analysis, as also their pros and cons. The analysis was made using a dataset from METRO Cash&Carry enabling the application of the methods on real data. The logistic regression with a Scorecard example and the discriminant analysis have a similar performance on estimating the probability of default from a client, despite the methodologies being different the approaches are similar and the results shown a small difference between them.
Daniela Rodrigues Recchia, M.Sc. in Statistics: Master of Science in Statistics at the Technische Universität Dortmund, Germany. Bachelor in Statistics at the State University of Campinas, Brazil. Professional experience as Statistician and Risk Analyst.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -The credit scoring methodology is increasingly used in companies and business field. This method once in the 1950 s introduced has developed and cover new branches today, such as mailing and fraud. This methodology is one of the most important to manage risks and estimate the probability of default of a client by borrowing money. There are several statistical methods to select the relevant characteristics for the scoring model such as linear regression models and classification tree and the goal in this study is to compare the two most used statistical methods on credit scoring: logistic regression - with categorized and raw data - and discriminant analysis, as also their pros and cons. The analysis was made using a dataset from METRO Cash&Carry enabling the application of the methods on real data. The logistic regression with a Scorecard example and the discriminant analysis have a similar performance on estimating the probability of default from a client, despite the methodologies being different the approaches are similar and the results shown a small difference between them. 124 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783639479539
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Books Puddle, New York, NY, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 26358271210
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Majestic Books, Hounslow, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. Print on Demand. N° de réf. du vendeur 355301173
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Allemagne
Etat : New. PRINT ON DEMAND. N° de réf. du vendeur 18358271200
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : moluna, Greven, Allemagne
Etat : New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: Rodrigues Recchia DanielaDaniela Rodrigues Recchia, M.Sc. in Statistics: Master of Science in Statistics at the Technische Universitaet Dortmund, Germany. Bachelor in Statistics at the State University of Campinas, Brazil. Professiona. N° de réf. du vendeur 4991596
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -The credit scoring methodology is increasingly used in companies and business field. This method once in the 1950's introduced has developed and cover new branches today, such as mailing and fraud. This methodology is one of the most important to manage risks and estimate the probability of default of a client by borrowing money. There are several statistical methods to select the relevant characteristics for the scoring model such as linear regression models and classification tree and the goal in this study is to compare the two most used statistical methods on credit scoring: logistic regression - with categorized and raw data - and discriminant analysis, as also their pros and cons. The analysis was made using a dataset from METRO Cash&Carry enabling the application of the methods on real data. The logistic regression with a Scorecard example and the discriminant analysis have a similar performance on estimating the probability of default from a client, despite the methodologies being different the approaches are similar and the results shown a small difference between them.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 124 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783639479539
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - The credit scoring methodology is increasingly used in companies and business field. This method once in the 1950 s introduced has developed and cover new branches today, such as mailing and fraud. This methodology is one of the most important to manage risks and estimate the probability of default of a client by borrowing money. There are several statistical methods to select the relevant characteristics for the scoring model such as linear regression models and classification tree and the goal in this study is to compare the two most used statistical methods on credit scoring: logistic regression - with categorized and raw data - and discriminant analysis, as also their pros and cons. The analysis was made using a dataset from METRO Cash&Carry enabling the application of the methods on real data. The logistic regression with a Scorecard example and the discriminant analysis have a similar performance on estimating the probability of default from a client, despite the methodologies being different the approaches are similar and the results shown a small difference between them. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783639479539
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : preigu, Osnabrück, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. A Comparison of Two Methods in Credit Scoring | with Application on Metro Data | Daniela Rodrigues Recchia | Taschenbuch | 124 S. | Englisch | 2013 | AV Akademikerverlag | EAN 9783639479539 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu. N° de réf. du vendeur 105617358
Quantité disponible : 5 disponible(s)