Document de séminaire de l'année 2008 dans le sujet anglais - Grammaire, style, technique de travail, grade : 1,7, RWTH Aachen University (Institut für Anglistik), cours: Syntaxtic Questions, 7 entrées dans la bibliographie, langue: anglais, abstrait: Bien que l'idée de valence ne soit pas nouvelle dans le domaine de la linguistique istique, il semble a reçu relativement peu d'attention jusqu'à présent. Lucien Tesnière, connu comme le développeur de la soi-disant « grammaire de dépendance », a été l'un des premiers linguistes à décrire la capacité d'un verbe à lier un certain nombre d'« acteurs »1 (cf. Tesnière 1980, 385-386). Dans son livre publié à titre posthume « Eléments de syntaxe structurale »2 (1959), il a appelé ce phénomène « valence ». Plus tard, d'autres linguistes ont adopté sa notion, l'ont modifiée et adaptée. L'un de ces linguistes est er Eisenberg, un philologue allemand, qui a écrit des travaux récents sur la grammaire dans lesquels le rôle de la valence verbale est souvent au centre de l'attention. Parce qu'une période de trente ans s'était écoulée depuis la première tentative de Tesnière de définir le phénomène de valence en linguistique, l'approche d'Eisenberg est beaucoup plus détaillée et comprend différents critères pour qu'il ait eu l'occasion d'apporter sa connaissance d'autres théories qui ont été créées après la publication du livre de Tesnière. Cet article de terme établira une comparaison de deux œuvres écrites par les auteurs mentionnés ci-dessus en tenant compte des mots qui dépendent des verbes. Puisque le verbe est souvent au centre de l'attention lorsque la notion de valence est concernée, le groupe des autres mots qui sont « gouvernés » par le verbe ne semble pas être examiné de la même manière. De plus, il ne semble même pas y avoir de terme standard pour de tels mots (peut-être sauf pour « arguments » (cf.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
EUR 10,99 expédition depuis Allemagne vers France
Destinations, frais et délaisVendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject Didactics - English - Grammar, Style, Working Technique, grade: 1,7, RWTH Aachen University (Institut für Anglistik ), course: Syntactic Questions, language: English, abstract: Although the idea of valency is not new in the field of linguistics, it seems to have receivedrelatively little attention up to now. Lucien Tesnière, who became known as the developer ofthe so called 'dependency grammar', was one of the first linguists who described thecapacity of a verb to bind a certain number of 'actants'1 (cf. Tesnière 1980, 385-386). In hisposthumously published book 'Eléments de syntaxe structurale'2 (1959) he called thisphenomenon 'valency'. Later on, other linguists adopted his notion, modified and adapted it.One of these linguists is Peter Eisenberg, a German philologist, who wrote some recentworks on grammar in which the role of verb valency is often in the center of attention.Because a period of thirty years had passed since Tesnière's first attempt to define thephenomenon of valency in linguistics, Eisenberg's approach is a lot more detailed andincludes different criteria for he had the opportunity to contribute his knowledge of othertheories which were created after Tesnière's book had been published.This term paper will draw a comparison of two works written by the authors mentionedabove with special regard to the words which are dependent on verbs. Since the verb is oftenin the center of attention when the notion of valency is concerned, the group of the otherwords which are 'governed' by the verb does not seem to be examined in the same way.Furthermore there does not even seem to be a standard term for such words (perhaps exceptfor 'arguments' (cf. Meyer 2005, 30), but even the notion of arguments is used in diverseways), so that I will use the word 'dependents' to refer to every possible linguistic elementwhich can be bound by a verb.The main aim of this paper will not only be to provide a small overview of dependents invalency theories, but also to illustrate the pros and cons of each of these theories in acomparison at the end.To introduce the reader into the topic, a small overview of the notion of valency will begiven at the beginning of the term paper. Later on, the most important aspects concerningdependents of both theories will be presented separately. After having compared the twoworks, pointed out the main discrepancies and having stated their benefits respectively theirdeficiencies, a final conclusion will be given. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783640194315
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject Didactics - English - Grammar, Style, Working Technique, grade: 1,7, RWTH Aachen University (Institut für Anglistik ), course: Syntactic Questions, language: English, abstract: Although the idea of valency is not new in the field of linguistics, it seems to have receivedrelatively little attention up to now. Lucien Tesnière, who became known as the developer ofthe so called 'dependency grammar', was one of the first linguists who described thecapacity of a verb to bind a certain number of 'actants'1 (cf. Tesnière 1980, 385-386). In hisposthumously published book 'Eléments de syntaxe structurale'2 (1959) he called thisphenomenon 'valency'. Later on, other linguists adopted his notion, modified and adapted it.One of these linguists is Peter Eisenberg, a German philologist, who wrote some recentworks on grammar in which the role of verb valency is often in the center of attention.Because a period of thirty years had passed since Tesnière's first attempt to define thephenomenon of valency in linguistics, Eisenberg's approach is a lot more detailed andincludes different criteria for he had the opportunity to contribute his knowledge of othertheories which were created after Tesnière's book had been published.This term paper will draw a comparison of two works written by the authors mentionedabove with special regard to the words which are dependent on verbs. Since the verb is oftenin the center of attention when the notion of valency is concerned, the group of the otherwords which are 'governed' by the verb does not seem to be examined in the same way.Furthermore there does not even seem to be a standard term for such words (perhaps exceptfor 'arguments' (cf. Meyer 2005, 30), but even the notion of arguments is used in diverseways), so that I will use the word 'dependents' to refer to every possible linguistic elementwhich can be bound by a verb.The main aim of this paper will not only be to provide a small overview of dependents invalency theories, but also to illustrate the pros and cons of each of these theories in acomparison at the end.To introduce the reader into the topic, a small overview of the notion of valency will begiven at the beginning of the term paper. Later on, the most important aspects concerningdependents of both theories will be presented separately. After having compared the twoworks, pointed out the main discrepancies and having stated their benefits respectively theirdeficiencies, a final conclusion will be given. 20 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783640194315
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject Didactics - English - Grammar, Style, Working Technique, grade: 1,7, RWTH Aachen University (Institut für Anglistik ), course: Syntactic Questions, language: English, abstract: Although the idea of valency is not new in the field of linguistics, it seems to have receivedrelatively little attention up to now. Lucien Tesnière, who became known as the developer ofthe so called ¿dependency grammar¿, was one of the first linguists who described thecapacity of a verb to bind a certain number of ¿actants¿1 (cf. Tesnière 1980, 385-386). In hisposthumously published book ¿Eléments de syntaxe structurale¿2 (1959) he called thisphenomenon ¿valency¿. Later on, other linguists adopted his notion, modified and adapted it.One of these linguists is Peter Eisenberg, a German philologist, who wrote some recentworks on grammar in which the role of verb valency is often in the center of attention.Because a period of thirty years had passed since Tesnière¿s first attempt to define thephenomenon of valency in linguistics, Eisenberg¿s approach is a lot more detailed andincludes different criteria for he had the opportunity to contribute his knowledge of othertheories which were created after Tesnière¿s book had been published.This term paper will draw a comparison of two works written by the authors mentionedabove with special regard to the words which are dependent on verbs. Since the verb is oftenin the center of attention when the notion of valency is concerned, the group of the otherwords which are ¿governed¿ by the verb does not seem to be examined in the same way.Furthermore there does not even seem to be a standard term for such words (perhaps exceptfor ¿arguments¿ (cf. Meyer 2005, 30), but even the notion of arguments is used in diverseways), so that I will use the word ¿dependents¿ to refer to every possible linguistic elementwhich can be bound by a verb.The main aim of this paper will not only be to provide a small overview of dependents invalency theories, but also to illustrate the pros and cons of each of these theories in acomparison at the end.To introduce the reader into the topic, a small overview of the notion of valency will begiven at the beginning of the term paper. Later on, the most important aspects concerningdependents of both theories will be presented separately. After having compared the twoworks, pointed out the main discrepancies and having stated their benefits respectively theirdeficiencies, a final conclusion will be given.BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt 20 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783640194315
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : California Books, Miami, FL, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur I-9783640194315
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : preigu, Osnabrück, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Verb Valency - The dependents of the verb | Tesniére in comparison to Eisenberg | Ilona Sontag | Taschenbuch | 20 S. | Englisch | 2008 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783640194315 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. N° de réf. du vendeur 101712957
Quantité disponible : 5 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Royaume-Uni
paperback. Etat : New. New. book. N° de réf. du vendeur ERICA82936401943146
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)