Articles liés à Deconstruction and Translation: Islamic Azad University...

Deconstruction and Translation: Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch - Couverture souple

Heydarali, Mojgan; Karimi Behbahani, Sayyed Mohammad

 
9783659873225: Deconstruction and Translation: Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch

Synopsis

For translation of certain texts with deconstructive textual elements, the translation goes for ‘Loss’ and ‘Gain’ and ends in ambiguity which is again a deconstructive element. This five-chapter book tries to investigate deconstructive textual elements of ‘A Portrait of the Artist as a Young man’ (Joyce, 2005), and ‘Ulysses’ (Joyce, 1992) as compared to their Persian translations in order to identify deconstructive textual elements at word and sentence levels. The results indicated that the translators have applied the ‘loss’ strategy 66 times (equal to 64.70%) and the ‘gain’ strategy 35 times (equal to 35.26%). Therefore, the frequency of the ‘loss’ strategy is remarkably more than the ‘gain’ strategy. Analyzing these deconstructive texts based on ‘loss’ and ‘gain’ strategy showed that ‘loss’ is more influential for creating the ST style. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the ‘loss’ strategy in specific and the ‘gain’ strategy in second place can be considered as a direct tool for providing deconstructive texts or analyzing these text types. The findings of this research can have some implications for translation theories, translation assessment, and training.

Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.

Présentation de l'éditeur

For translation of certain texts with deconstructive textual elements, the translation goes for ‘Loss’ and ‘Gain’ and ends in ambiguity which is again a deconstructive element. This five-chapter book tries to investigate deconstructive textual elements of ‘A Portrait of the Artist as a Young man’ (Joyce, 2005), and ‘Ulysses’ (Joyce, 1992) as compared to their Persian translations in order to identify deconstructive textual elements at word and sentence levels. The results indicated that the translators have applied the ‘loss’ strategy 66 times (equal to 64.70%) and the ‘gain’ strategy 35 times (equal to 35.26%). Therefore, the frequency of the ‘loss’ strategy is remarkably more than the ‘gain’ strategy. Analyzing these deconstructive texts based on ‘loss’ and ‘gain’ strategy showed that ‘loss’ is more influential for creating the ST style. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the ‘loss’ strategy in specific and the ‘gain’ strategy in second place can be considered as a direct tool for providing deconstructive texts or analyzing these text types. The findings of this research can have some implications for translation theories, translation assessment, and training.

Biographie de l'auteur

Mojgan Heydarali holds an M.A. in Translation Studies at Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch. She is interested in translation, Linguistics, Literature, and writing.

Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.