Articles liés à Intuition and Reasoning in Moral Judgment: A Controversy
Synopsis
Document de séminaire de l'année 2013 dans le sujet Philosophie - Philosophie du XXe siècle, grade: 1, Université de Vienne (Institut de philosophie), cours: philosophie moralpsychologie, langue: anglais, abstrait: Ce papier de séminaire traite de l'équilibre entre l'intuition et l'affect d'une main, et conscient raisonnement sur l'autre , dans les décisions morales. La base de cette analyse repose sur des recherches neurobiologiques et psychologiques récentes. L'article recherche d'abord des commentaires de la neurophysiologie pour comprendre ce que l'on sait du «câblage» dans notre cerveau pour les décisions morales. Les jugements moraux sont-ils effectués dans les régions corticales « rationnelles » du cerveau ou dans la région sous-corticale « intuitive », affective et émotionnelle ? Il présente ensuite une controverse entre Jonathan Haidt et Pizarro et Bloom sur la prédominance de l'intuition sur le raisonnement dans le jugement moral. Jonathan Haidt propose une théorie appelée approche intuitionniste sociale qui postule une priorité de l'intuition sur la raison, combinée à une composante sociale. Les décisions morales sont principalement intuitives, soutient-il, et la raison est principalement utilisée pour justifier la décision par la suite. Pizarro et Bloom ne sont pas entièrement convaincus. Bien qu'ils soient d'accord avec certaines parties de la théorie de Haidt, ils contredisent sa conclusion générale sur la domination de l'intuition sur la raison. Selon eux, il y a suffisamment de place pour entraîner ses intuitions et pour préparer rationnellement les décisions morales. Haidt contre-arguments, mais concède que des données statistiques sont manquantes, ce qui permettrait une évaluation finale de la question.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Acheter neuf
Afficher cet article
EUR 15,95
EUR 10,99 expédition depuis Allemagne vers France
Destinations, frais et délais
Résultats de recherche pour Intuition and Reasoning in Moral Judgment: A Controversy
Image fournie par le vendeur
Intuition and Reasoning in Moral Judgment : A Controversy
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Philosophy - Philosophy of the 20th century, grade: 1, University of Vienna (Institut für Philosophie), course: Philosophische Moralpsychologie, language: English, abstract: This seminar paper is about the balance between intuition and affect on one hand, and conscious reasoning on the other, in moral decisions. The basis for this analysis consists of recent neurobiological and psychological research.The paper first looks for some input from Neurophysiology to understand what is known about the 'wiring' in our brain for moral decisions. Are moral judgments effectuated in the 'rational' cortical regions of the brain or in the 'intuitive', affective, and emotional subcortical region It then presents a controversy between Jonathan Haidt and Pizarro and Bloom over the predominance of intuition over reasoning in moral judgment. Jonathan Haidt proposes a theory called Social Intuitionist Approach that postulates a priority of intuition over reason, combined with a social component. Moral decisions are predominantly intuitive, he argues, and reason is primarily used to justify the decision afterwards. Pizarro and Bloom are not fully convinced. While they agree with some parts of Haidt's theory, they contradict his overall conclusion about the dominance of intuition over reason. In their opinion there is sufficient room for training one's intuitions and for rationally preparing moral decisions.Haidt counters the counter-arguments, but concedes that statistical data are missing, which would allow a final assessment of the matter. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783668025332
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
Intuition and Reasoning in Moral Judgment
impression à la demandeVendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Philosophy - Philosophy of the 20th century, grade: 1, University of Vienna (Institut für Philosophie), course: Philosophische Moralpsychologie, language: English, abstract: This seminar paper is about the balance between intuition and affect on one hand, and conscious reasoning on the other, in moral decisions. The basis for this analysis consists of recent neurobiological and psychological research.The paper first looks for some input from Neurophysiology to understand what is known about the 'wiring' in our brain for moral decisions. Are moral judgments effectuated in the 'rational' cortical regions of the brain or in the 'intuitive', affective, and emotional subcortical region It then presents a controversy between Jonathan Haidt and Pizarro and Bloom over the predominance of intuition over reasoning in moral judgment. Jonathan Haidt proposes a theory called Social Intuitionist Approach that postulates a priority of intuition over reason, combined with a social component. Moral decisions are predominantly intuitive, he argues, and reason is primarily used to justify the decision afterwards. Pizarro and Bloom are not fully convinced. While they agree with some parts of Haidt's theory, they contradict his overall conclusion about the dominance of intuition over reason. In their opinion there is sufficient room for training one's intuitions and for rationally preparing moral decisions.Haidt counters the counter-arguments, but concedes that statistical data are missing, which would allow a final assessment of the matter. 20 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783668025332
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
Intuition and Reasoning in Moral Judgment
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Philosophy - Philosophy of the 20th century, grade: 1, University of Vienna (Institut für Philosophie), course: Philosophische Moralpsychologie, language: English, abstract: This seminar paper is about the balance between intuition and affect on one hand, and conscious reasoning on the other, in moral decisions. The basis for this analysis consists of recent neurobiological and psychological research.The paper first looks for some input from Neurophysiology to understand what is known about the ¿wiring¿ in our brain for moral decisions. Are moral judgments effectuated in the ¿rational¿ cortical regions of the brain or in the ¿intuitive¿, affective, and emotional subcortical region It then presents a controversy between Jonathan Haidt and Pizarro and Bloom over the predominance of intuition over reasoning in moral judgment. Jonathan Haidt proposes a theory called Social Intuitionist Approach that postulates a priority of intuition over reason, combined with a social component. Moral decisions are predominantly intuitive, he argues, and reason is primarily used to justify the decision afterwards.Pizarro and Bloom are not fully convinced. While they agree with some parts of Haidt¿s theory, they contradict his overall conclusion about the dominance of intuition over reason. In their opinion there is sufficient room for training one¿s intuitions and for rationally preparing moral decisions.Haidt counters the counter-arguments, but concedes that statistical data are missing, which would allow a final assessment of the matter.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 20 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783668025332
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
Intuition and Reasoning in Moral Judgment | A Controversy
impression à la demandeVendeur : preigu, Osnabrück, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Intuition and Reasoning in Moral Judgment | A Controversy | Karl-Heinz Mayer | Taschenbuch | 20 S. | Englisch | 2015 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783668025332 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. N° de réf. du vendeur 104209875
Quantité disponible : 5 disponible(s)