Articles liés à A lexicalist account of argument structure
Synopsis
There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Catego
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
- ÉditeurLanguage Science Press
- Date d'édition2018
- ISBN 10 3961101221
- ISBN 13 9783961101221
- ReliureRelié
- Langueanglais
- Nombre de pages104
- Coordonnées du fabricantnon disponible
Acheter neuf
Afficher cet article
EUR 25,08
EUR 1,09 expédition depuis Etats-Unis vers France
Destinations, frais et délaisRésultats de recherche pour A lexicalist account of argument structure
Image d'archives
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Ancien ou d'occasion
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : Buchpark, Trebbin, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : Sehr gut. Zustand: Sehr gut | Seiten: 104 | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher. N° de réf. du vendeur 33095077/2
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image d'archives
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
HRD. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L1-9783961101221
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image d'archives
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. In. N° de réf. du vendeur ria9783961101221_new
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image d'archives
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
Évaluation du vendeur 4 sur 5 étoiles
HRD. Etat : New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L1-9783961101221
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image fournie par le vendeur
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : moluna, Greven, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 4 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. Über den AutorrnrnStefan Mueller studied Computer Science, Computational Linguistics and Linguistics at the Humboldt University at Berlin and in Edinburgh. He worked at the German Research Center of Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) in Saarbruec. N° de réf. du vendeur 449808815
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image fournie par le vendeur
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Buch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Categorial Grammar, Minimalism, HPSG and standard LFG). On the other hand there are constructions that should be treated by very specific, phrasal schemata as in Construction Grammar and LFG and HPSG. So the conclusion is that both schools are right (and wrong) and that a combination of ideas from both camps is needed. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783961101221
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Buch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Categorial Grammar, Minimalism, HPSG and standard LFG). On the other hand there are constructions that should be treated by very specific, phrasal schemata as in Construction Grammar and LFG and HPSG. So the conclusion is that both schools are right (and wrong) and that a combination of ideas from both camps is needed. 104 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783961101221
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Image d'archives
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : California Books, Miami, FL, Etats-Unis
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur I-9783961101221
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Image fournie par le vendeur
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Edité par
Language Science Press, Language Science Press Okt 2018, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Buch. Etat : Neu. Neuware -There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Categorial Grammar, Minimalism, HPSG and standard LFG). On the other hand there are constructions that should be treated by very specific, phrasal schemata as in Construction Grammar and LFG and HPSG. So the conclusion is that both schools are right (and wrong) and that a combination of ideas from both camps is needed.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 104 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9783961101221
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Image fournie par le vendeur
A lexicalist account of argument structure (Hardback or Cased Book)
Edité par
Language Science Press 10/18/2018, 2018
ISBN 10 : 3961101221
ISBN 13 : 9783961101221
Neuf
Couverture rigide
Vendeur : BargainBookStores, Grand Rapids, MI, Etats-Unis
Évaluation du vendeur 5 sur 5 étoiles
Hardback or Cased Book. Etat : New. A lexicalist account of argument structure 0.82. Book. N° de réf. du vendeur BBS-9783961101221
Quantité disponible : 5 disponible(s)