Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware 120 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786134346405
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articlesavailable from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Johnson v.M'Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), is a landmark decision of theU.S. Supreme Court that held that private citizens could not purchaselands from Native Americans. As the facts were recited by Chief JusticeJohn Marshall, the successor in interest to a private purchase from thePiankeshaw attempted to maintain an action of ejectment against theholder of a federal land patent. The case is one of the most influentialand well-known decisions of the Marshall Court, a fixture of thefirst-year curriculum in nearly all US law schools. Marshall's prosaicand eminently quotable opinion lays down the foundations of the doctrineof aboriginal title in the United States, and the related discoverydoctrine. However, the vast majority of the opinion is dicta; as validtitle is a basic element of the cause of action for ejectment, theholding does not extend to the validity of M'Intosh's title, much lessthe property rights of the Piankeshaw. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786134346405
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articlesavailable from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Johnson v.M'Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), is a landmark decision of theU.S. Supreme Court that held that private citizens could not purchaselands from Native Americans. As the facts were recited by Chief JusticeJohn Marshall, the successor in interest to a private purchase from thePiankeshaw attempted to maintain an action of ejectment against theholder of a federal land patent. The case is one of the most influentialand well-known decisions of the Marshall Court, a fixture of thefirst-year curriculum in nearly all US law schools. Marshall's prosaicand eminently quotable opinion lays down the foundations of the doctrineof aboriginal title in the United States, and the related discoverydoctrine. However, the vast majority of the opinion is dicta; as validtitle is a basic element of the cause of action for ejectment, theholding does not extend to the validity of M'Intosh's title, much lessthe property rights of the Piankeshaw.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 120 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786134346405
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)