Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a pivotal role in protecting human subjects participating in research. While IRBs were established for the primary purpose of protecting human subjects, nearly five decades later there has been no empirical evidence demonstrating that IRBs in fact protect human research subjects. This is because IRB oversight alone is insufficient in protecting human subjects. In addition to IRBs, investigators, institutions, research participants, research sponsors, and the Federal government all share responsibilities for protecting human subjects. In the United States, IRBs carry out their mission of protecting human research subjects through implementation of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, also known as the Common Rule. Here I propose that the quality of IRBs be defined as how well they implement the Common Rule and present examples of measuring IRB quality and performance so defined that lead to quality improvements. Based on this definition, the quality of IRB reviews and IRB decisions can also be defined that are quantifiable and measurable, allowing future assessment and improvement of these important IRB qualities.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a pivotal role in protecting human subjects participating in research. While IRBs were established for the primary purpose of protecting human subjects, nearly five decades later there has been no empirical evidence demonstrating that IRBs in fact protect human research subjects. This is because IRB oversight alone is insufficient in protecting human subjects. In addition to IRBs, investigators, institutions, research participants, research sponsors, and the Federal government all share responsibilities for protecting human subjects. In the United States, IRBs carry out their mission of protecting human research subjects through implementation of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, also known as the Common Rule. Here I propose that the quality of IRBs be defined as how well they implement the Common Rule and present examples of measuring IRB quality and performance so defined that lead to quality improvements. Based on this definition, the quality of IRB reviews and IRB decisions can also be defined that are quantifiable and measurable, allowing future assessment and improvement of these important IRB qualities. 216 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786138826378
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : moluna, Greven, Allemagne
Etat : New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: Tsan Dr. Min-FuMin-Fu Tsan received his M.D. degree from National Taiwan University Medical College and a Ph.D. degree in Physiology from Harvard University. He is board certified in internal Medicine, Hematology, and Nuclear Medicin. N° de réf. du vendeur 675004596
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : Books Puddle, Woodside, NY, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 26395826172
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Majestic Books, Hounslow, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. Print on Demand. N° de réf. du vendeur 400583715
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Allemagne
Etat : New. PRINT ON DEMAND. N° de réf. du vendeur 18395826166
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a pivotal role in protecting human subjects participating in research. While IRBs were established for the primary purpose of protecting human subjects, nearly five decades later there has been no empirical evidence demonstrating that IRBs in fact protect human research subjects. This is because IRB oversight alone is insufficient in protecting human subjects. In addition to IRBs, investigators, institutions, research participants, research sponsors, and the Federal government all share responsibilities for protecting human subjects. In the United States, IRBs carry out their mission of protecting human research subjects through implementation of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, also known as the Common Rule. Here I propose that the quality of IRBs be defined as how well they implement the Common Rule and present examples of measuring IRB quality and performance so defined that lead to quality improvements. Based on this definition, the quality of IRB reviews and IRB decisions can also be defined that are quantifiable and measurable, allowing future assessment and improvement of these important IRB qualities. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786138826378
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : preigu, Osnabrück, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Assessing the quality and performance of institutional review boards | Min-Fu Tsan | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2022 | Scholars' Press | EAN 9786138826378 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: SIA OmniScriptum Publishing, Brivibas Gatve 197, 1039 RIGA, LETTLAND, customerservice[at]vdm-vsg[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu. N° de réf. du vendeur 122979966
Quantité disponible : 5 disponible(s)
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a pivotal role in protecting human subjects participating in research. While IRBs were established for the primary purpose of protecting human subjects, nearly five decades later there has been no empirical evidence demonstrating that IRBs in fact protect human research subjects. This is because IRB oversight alone is insufficient in protecting human subjects. In addition to IRBs, investigators, institutions, research participants, research sponsors, and the Federal government all share responsibilities for protecting human subjects. In the United States, IRBs carry out their mission of protecting human research subjects through implementation of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, also known as the Common Rule. Here I propose that the quality of IRBs be defined as how well they implement the Common Rule and present examples of measuring IRB quality and performance so defined that lead to quality improvements. Based on this definition, the quality of IRB reviews and IRB decisions can also be defined that are quantifiable and measurable, allowing future assessment and improvement of these important IRB qualities.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 216 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786138826378
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)