This book discusses the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as compared to traditional litigation. Is ADR effective for all kinds of disputes or only for specific ones? How can it be promoted in countries where it has rarely been used? The author highlights a key factor for promoting ADR in these countries: the need to change the mindset of litigants. The successful practice of ADR in the United States is compared to practice in Egypt, where ADR is under-utilized and considered inferior to litigation. Guided by the U.S. approach, the author proposes practical ideas for encouraging the use of ADR in Egypt, suggesting some ADR programs—similar to those used in the U.S. federal district courts—that might be suitable for the Egyptian judicial system. A key step in increasing the use of ADR is informing the public about the benefits of ADR. The author also provides useful information for policy makers and program planners about how to introduce ADR programs into the Egyptian courts.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
This book discusses the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as compared to traditional litigation. Is ADR effective for all kinds of disputes or only for specific ones? How can it be promoted in countries where it has rarely been used? The author highlights a key factor for promoting ADR in these countries: the need to change the mindset of litigants. The successful practice of ADR in the United States is compared to practice in Egypt, where ADR is under-utilized and considered inferior to litigation. Guided by the U.S. approach, the author proposes practical ideas for encouraging the use of ADR in Egypt, suggesting some ADR programs—similar to those used in the U.S. federal district courts—that might be suitable for the Egyptian judicial system. A key step in increasing the use of ADR is informing the public about the benefits of ADR. The author also provides useful information for policy makers and program planners about how to introduce ADR programs into the Egyptian courts.
Mahmoud Sabry is a law practitioner working in the field of dispute resolution in the Egyptian judiciary. He studied ADR while visiting at the Federal Judicial Center in Washington, D.C.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This book discusses the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as compared to traditional litigation. Is ADR effective for all kinds of disputes or only for specific ones How can it be promoted in countries where it has rarely been used The author highlights a key factor for promoting ADR in these countries: the need to change the mindset of litigants. The successful practice of ADR in the United States is compared to practice in Egypt, where ADR is under-utilized and considered inferior to litigation. Guided by the U.S. approach, the author proposes practical ideas for encouraging the use of ADR in Egypt, suggesting some ADR programs-similar to those used in the U.S. federal district courts-that might be suitable for the Egyptian judicial system. A key step in increasing the use of ADR is informing the public about the benefits of ADR. The author also provides useful information for policy makers and program planners about how to introduce ADR programs into the Egyptian courts. 80 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786202074711
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Revaluation Books, Exeter, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : Brand New. 80 pages. 8.66x5.91x0.19 inches. In Stock. N° de réf. du vendeur zk620207471X
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book discusses the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as compared to traditional litigation. Is ADR effective for all kinds of disputes or only for specific ones How can it be promoted in countries where it has rarely been used The author highlights a key factor for promoting ADR in these countries: the need to change the mindset of litigants. The successful practice of ADR in the United States is compared to practice in Egypt, where ADR is under-utilized and considered inferior to litigation. Guided by the U.S. approach, the author proposes practical ideas for encouraging the use of ADR in Egypt, suggesting some ADR programs-similar to those used in the U.S. federal district courts-that might be suitable for the Egyptian judicial system. A key step in increasing the use of ADR is informing the public about the benefits of ADR. The author also provides useful information for policy makers and program planners about how to introduce ADR programs into the Egyptian courts. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786202074711
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : moluna, Greven, Allemagne
Etat : New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: Sabry Mahmoud A.Mahmoud Sabry is a law practitioner working in the field of dispute resolution in the Egyptian judiciary. He studied ADR while visiting at the Federal Judicial Center in Washington, D.C.This book discusses the eff. N° de réf. du vendeur 385925001
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -This book discusses the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as compared to traditional litigation. Is ADR effective for all kinds of disputes or only for specific ones How can it be promoted in countries where it has rarely been used The author highlights a key factor for promoting ADR in these countries: the need to change the mindset of litigants. The successful practice of ADR in the United States is compared to practice in Egypt, where ADR is under-utilized and considered inferior to litigation. Guided by the U.S. approach, the author proposes practical ideas for encouraging the use of ADR in Egypt, suggesting some ADR programs-similar to those used in the U.S. federal district courts-that might be suitable for the Egyptian judicial system. A key step in increasing the use of ADR is informing the public about the benefits of ADR. The author also provides useful information for policy makers and program planners about how to introduce ADR programs into the Egyptian courts.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 80 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786202074711
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : preigu, Osnabrück, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Changing the Mindset of Litigants: Using ADR in the U.S. & Egypt | Mahmoud A. Sabry | Taschenbuch | 80 S. | Englisch | 2017 | LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing | EAN 9786202074711 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu. N° de réf. du vendeur 110546538
Quantité disponible : 5 disponible(s)