This study presents a comparative study between Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in predicting the compressive strength of high strength concrete. The comparison was made based on the same experimental datasets. The inputs investigated in this study were percentage of Cement, Silica fume and coarse aggregate. The methods employed in ANN and RSM were feedforward neural network and face-centered central composite, correspondingly. The comparison between the two models showed that RSM performed better than ANN with coefficient of determination (R2) closer to 1 with 0.9959. In addition, all the predicted results by RSM against the experimental results fell within 10% margin. For ANN model, however, three of its predicted results were outside the 10% margin. Silica fume was also found to have greater impacts on the compressive strength of concrete than coarse aggregate.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Books Puddle, New York, NY, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 26397359291
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This study presents a comparative study between Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in predicting the compressive strength of high strength concrete. The comparison was made based on the same experimental datasets. The inputs investigated in this study were percentage of Cement, Silica fume and coarse aggregate. The methods employed in ANN and RSM were feedforward neural network and face-centered central composite, correspondingly. The comparison between the two models showed that RSM performed better than ANN with coefficient of determination (R2) closer to 1 with 0.9959. In addition, all the predicted results by RSM against the experimental results fell within 10% margin. For ANN model, however, three of its predicted results were outside the 10% margin. Silica fume was also found to have greater impacts on the compressive strength of concrete than coarse aggregate. 68 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786206163015
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Allemagne
Etat : New. PRINT ON DEMAND. N° de réf. du vendeur 18397359281
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : moluna, Greven, Allemagne
Kartoniert / Broschiert. Etat : New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. This study presents a comparative study between Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in predicting the compressive strength of high strength concrete. The comparison was made based on the same experimental datasets. The inp. N° de réf. du vendeur 884424618
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -This study presents a comparative study between Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in predicting the compressive strength of high strength concrete. The comparison was made based on the same experimental datasets. The inputs investigated in this study were percentage of Cement, Silica fume and coarse aggregate. The methods employed in ANN and RSM were feedforward neural network and face-centered central composite, correspondingly. The comparison between the two models showed that RSM performed better than ANN with coefficient of determination (R2) closer to 1 with 0.9959. In addition, all the predicted results by RSM against the experimental results fell within 10% margin. For ANN model, however, three of its predicted results were outside the 10% margin. Silica fume was also found to have greater impacts on the compressive strength of concrete than coarse aggregate.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 68 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786206163015
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - This study presents a comparative study between Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in predicting the compressive strength of high strength concrete. The comparison was made based on the same experimental datasets. The inputs investigated in this study were percentage of Cement, Silica fume and coarse aggregate. The methods employed in ANN and RSM were feedforward neural network and face-centered central composite, correspondingly. The comparison between the two models showed that RSM performed better than ANN with coefficient of determination (R2) closer to 1 with 0.9959. In addition, all the predicted results by RSM against the experimental results fell within 10% margin. For ANN model, however, three of its predicted results were outside the 10% margin. Silica fume was also found to have greater impacts on the compressive strength of concrete than coarse aggregate. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786206163015
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)