Main theme: This article demonstrates that, among a large number of prediction models, the Facebook Prophet Model had the highest accuracy when it came to anticipating pandemic circumstances.Result Analysis: They presented how the models performed on the test sets using the regression and time series models, as well as the analysis using Facebook Prophet. They can calculate the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for each model using these results. The comparison of the models based on their RMSE scores is shown in Table I. Table I indicates that when forecasting confirmed instances, the FPM has the lowest average error. Second place goes to the ARIMA model, which is followed by the AR and MA models. However, because the ARIMA incorporates both the MA and AR models, they are not taken into account.The HWA model, which comes after these two, has the lowest score, followed by the PR. Table I shows that the findings are almost identical to the table confirmed cases results, with the FPM coming out on top, followed by the ARIMA, HWA, and PR, in that order. As a result, they come to the conclusion that the best models for anticipating the pandemic situation are as follows: Facebook.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L0-9786208118105
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : California Books, Miami, FL, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur I-9786208118105
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L0-9786208118105
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. In English. N° de réf. du vendeur ria9786208118105_new
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : Books Puddle, Woodside, NY, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 26404194740
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware 52 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786208118105
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Majestic Books, Hounslow, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. Print on Demand. N° de réf. du vendeur 408959595
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Allemagne
Etat : New. PRINT ON DEMAND. N° de réf. du vendeur 18404194750
Quantité disponible : 4 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Main theme: This article demonstrates that, among a large number of prediction models, the Facebook Prophet Model had the highest accuracy when it came to anticipating pandemic circumstances.Result Analysis: They presented how the models performed on the test sets using the regression and time series models, as well as the analysis using Facebook Prophet. They can calculate the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for each model using these results. The comparison of the models based on their RMSE scores is shown in Table I. Table I indicates that when forecasting confirmed instances, the FPM has the lowest average error. Second place goes to the ARIMA model, which is followed by the AR and MA models. However, because the ARIMA incorporates both the MA and AR models, they are not taken into account.The HWA model, which comes after these two, has the lowest score, followed by the PR. Table I shows that the findings are almost identical to the table confirmed cases results, with the FPM coming out on top, followed by the ARIMA, HWA, and PR, in that order. As a result, they come to the conclusion that the best models for anticipating the pandemic situation are as follows: Facebook. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786208118105
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Main theme: This article demonstrates that, among a large number of prediction models, the Facebook Prophet Model had the highest accuracy when it came to anticipating pandemic circumstances.Result Analysis: They presented how the models performed on the test sets using the regression and time series models, as well as the analysis using Facebook Prophet. They can calculate the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for each model using these results. The comparison of the models based on their RMSE scores is shown in Table I. Table I indicates that when forecasting confirmed instances, the FPM has the lowest average error. Second place goes to the ARIMA model, which is followed by the AR and MA models. However, because the ARIMA incorporates both the MA and AR models, they are not taken into account.The HWA model, which comes after these two, has the lowest score, followed by the PR. Table I shows that the findings are almost identical to the table confirmed cases results, with the FPM coming out on top, followed by the ARIMA, HWA, and PR, in that order. As a result, they come to the conclusion that the best models for anticipating the pandemic situation are as follows: Facebook.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 52 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9786208118105
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)