The essays that are collected in Controversy and Confrontation provide a closer insight into the relationship between controversy and confrontation that deepens our understanding of the functioning of argumentative discourse in managing differences of opinion. Their authors stem from two backgrounds. First, the controversy scholars Dascal, Marras, Euli, Regner, Ferreira, and Lessl discuss historical controversies in science, both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective; Saim concentrates on a historical controversy; Fritz provides a historical perspective on controversies by analyzing communication principles. Second the argumentation scholars Johnson, van Laar, van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels address theoretical or empirical aspects of argumentative confrontation; Aakhus and Vasilyeva examine argumentative discourse from the perspective of conversation analysis; Jackson analyzes argumentative confrontation in a recent debate between scientists and politicians. Last but not least, two contributors, Kutrovátz and Zemplén, make an attempt to bridge the study of historical controversy and the study of argumentation.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
The essays that are collected in Controversy and Confrontation provide a closer insight into the relationship between controversy and confrontation that deepens our understanding of the functioning of argumentative discourse in managing differences of opinion. Their authors stem from two backgrounds. First, the controversy scholars Dascal, Marras, Euli, Regner, Ferreira, and Lessl discuss historical controversies in science, both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective; Saim concentrates on a historical controversy; Fritz provides a historical perspective on controversies by analyzing communication principles. Second the argumentation scholars Johnson, van Laar, van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels address theoretical or empirical aspects of argumentative confrontation; Aakhus and Vasilyeva examine argumentative discourse from the perspective of conversation analysis; Jackson analyzes argumentative confrontation in a recent debate between scientists and politicians. Last but not least, two contributors, Kutrovátz and Zemplén, make an attempt to bridge the study of historical controversy and the study of argumentation.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, Etats-Unis
Hardcover. Etat : Fine. Still Sealed in Plastic. Never used! N° de réf. du vendeur mon0003450827
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Mooney's bookstore, Den Helder, Pays-Bas
Etat : Very good. N° de réf. du vendeur E-9789027218865-4-2
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Revaluation Books, Exeter, Royaume-Uni
Hardcover. Etat : Brand New. uk ed. edition. 278 pages. 9.75x6.75x0.75 inches. In Stock. N° de réf. du vendeur __9027218862
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Pórtico [Portico], ZARAGOZA, Z, Espagne
Tapa blanda. Etat : New. EEMEREN, F. H. VAN / B. GARSSEN, EDS.: CONTROVERSY AND CONFRONTATION. RELATING CONTROVERSY ANALYSIS WITH ARGUMENTATION THEORY. AMSTERDAM, 2008, xiii 278 p. , 690 gr. Encuadernacion original. Nuevo. (LB-1-6) 690 gr. Libro. N° de réf. du vendeur 458347
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)