World university ranking started one and a half decades ago for the purpose of understanding what makes an excellent institution of higher education. Subsequent to the appearance of the Academic Ranking of World Universities at the Shanghai Jiaotong University, there soon emerged the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. These three ranking systems are considered the classics as they are the fore-runners, although no less than ten new systems have come to the arena.
The various ranking systems adopt a common approach of weight-and-sum to process the indicator data. Each system, somewhat arbitrarily, decides on a set of indicators and assigns different weights to these, presumably reflecting their relative importance. This simple (and simplistic) approach meets well common sense. And, in fact, much of the discussion on world university rankings is conducted at the commonsensical level.
However, analyses conducted in the recent years uncovered several problems of the prevalent approach: spurious precision, mutual compensation, weight discrepancy, indicator redundancy, etc., which render the overall scores and ranking suspect in terms of validity. These are due to systems ignoring the fact that world university rankings are a form of social measurement and therefore need be seen from this perspective.
Moreover, rankings encourage competition and, in the highly competitive world of today, it is natural that institutional attention is focused on the ranking results. By now, the original purpose of world university ranking seems to have been overshadowed, and world university rankings look more like international academic contests, as though they are annual sports meets.
This monograph collects together many articles pertaining to the identified measurement and statistical issues of world university rankings and suggests remedies to make ranking results more trustworthy.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
World university ranking started one and a half decades ago for the purpose of understanding what makes an excellent institution of higher education. Subsequent to the appearance of the Academic Ranking of World Universities at the Shanghai Jiaotong University, there soon emerged the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. These three ranking systems are considered the classics as they are the fore-runners, although no less than ten new systems have come to the arena.
The various ranking systems adopt a common approach of weight-and-sum to process the indicator data. Each system, somewhat arbitrarily, decides on a set of indicators and assigns different weights to these, presumably reflecting their relative importance. This simple (and simplistic) approach meets well common sense. And, in fact, much of the discussion on world university rankings is conducted at the commonsensical level.
However, analyses conducted in the recent years uncovered several problems of the prevalent approach: spurious precision, mutual compensation, weight discrepancy, indicator redundancy, etc., which render the overall scores and ranking suspect in terms of validity. These are due to systems ignoring the fact that world university rankings are a form of social measurement and therefore need be seen from this perspective.
Moreover, rankings encourage competition and, in the highly competitive world of today, it is natural that institutional attention is focused on the ranking results. By now, the original purpose of world university ranking seems to have been overshadowed, and world university rankings look more like international academic contests, as though they are annual sports meets.
This monograph collects together many articles pertaining to the identified measurement and statistical issues of world university rankings and suggests remedies to make ranking results more trustworthy.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, Etats-Unis
Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. N° de réf. du vendeur mon0002513267
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : suffolkbooks, Center moriches, NY, Etats-Unis
hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Fast Shipping - Safe and Secure 7 days a week! N° de réf. du vendeur 3TWDDA001X2Z
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Bill & Ben Books, Faringdon, Royaume-Uni
Hardback. Etat : New. World university ranking started one and a half decades ago for the purpose of understanding what makes an excellent institution of higher education. Subsequent to the appearance of the Academic Ranking of World Universities at the Shanghai Jiaotong University, there soon emerged the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. These three ranking systems are considered the classics as they are the fore-runners, although no less than ten new systems have come to the arena.The various ranking systems adopt a common approach of weight-and-sum to process the indicator data. Each system, somewhat arbitrarily, decides on a set of indicators and assigns different weights to these, presumably reflecting their relative importance. This simple (and simplistic) approach meets well common sense. And, in fact, much of the discussion on world university rankings is conducted at the commonsensical level.However, analyses conducted in the recent years uncovered several problems of the prevalent approach: spurious precision, mutual compensation, weight discrepancy, indicator redundancy, etc., which render the overall scores and ranking suspect in terms of validity. These are due to systems ignoring the fact that world university rankings are a form of social measurement and therefore need be seen from this perspective.Moreover, rankings encourage competition and, in the highly competitive world of today, it is natural that institutional attention is focused on the ranking results. By now, the original purpose of world university ranking seems to have been overshadowed, and world university rankings look more like international academic contests, as though they are annual sports meets.This monograph collects together many articles pertaining to the identified measurement and statistical issues of world university rankings and suggests remedies to make ranking results more trustworthy. N° de réf. du vendeur 0061937
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Basi6 International, Irving, TX, Etats-Unis
Etat : Brand New. New. US edition. Expediting shipping for all USA and Europe orders excluding PO Box. Excellent Customer Service. N° de réf. du vendeur ABEOCT25-261958
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Romtrade Corp., STERLING HEIGHTS, MI, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. This is a Brand-new US Edition. This Item may be shipped from US or any other country as we have multiple locations worldwide. N° de réf. du vendeur ABNR-116806
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Basi6 International, Irving, TX, Etats-Unis
Etat : Brand New. New. US edition. Expediting shipping for all USA and Europe orders excluding PO Box. Excellent Customer Service. N° de réf. du vendeur ABEOCT25-300794
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : ALLBOOKS1, Direk, SA, Australie
Brand new book. Fast ship. Please provide full street address as we are not able to ship to P O box address. N° de réf. du vendeur SHAK261958
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Books Puddle, New York, NY, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. pp. 288 1st edition NO-PA16APR2015-KAP. N° de réf. du vendeur 26375207683
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : ALLBOOKS1, Direk, SA, Australie
Brand new book. Fast ship. Please provide full street address as we are not able to ship to P O box address. N° de réf. du vendeur SHAK300794
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : Majestic Books, Hounslow, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. pp. 288. N° de réf. du vendeur 371886300
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)