Vendeur : Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Etats-Unis
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. What does a fair juror actually do when the evidence is incomplete, the witnesses disagree, and certainty is impossible?In the Jury Box: How Jurors Evaluate Evidence, Resist Bias, and Reach a Fair Decision is a practical guide to the reasoning demands of jury service. John S. Pritchett examines how jurors can evaluate testimony, documents, physical and digital evidence, expert opinions, eyewitness memory, inconsistencies, missing evidence, and competing narratives without allowing confidence, emotion, assumptions, or courtroom performance to substitute for proof.The book's central idea is "bounded judgment" jurors must decide from the evidence admitted in court, the law provided by the judge, and the burden of proof-without pretending they can know everything that happened.Through clear examples drawn from criminal and civil disputes, the book explores the difference between evidence and story, direct and circumstantial evidence, what a particular piece of evidence actually proves, how gaps in the record should be treated, why eyewitness certainty can mislead, how expert authority can influence judgment, and how bias often operates through ordinary expectations rather than obvious prejudice.Later chapters turn to the jury room itself: burdens of proof, reasonable doubt, combining evidence, resisting premature conclusions, disagreement, responsible dissent, unanimity, compromise, and the challenge of reaching a verdict without demanding impossible certainty.This is not a manual for reaching a particular verdict. It is a guide to thinking carefully about what has been proved, what remains uncertain, and what the law actually asks jurors to decide.Written for prospective jurors, former jurors, students, educators, and readers interested in courts, evidence, critical thinking, and decision-making, In the Jury Box offers a disciplined framework for fair judgment under uncertainty.A fair verdict does not require perfect knowledge. It requires careful reasoning within the limits of the evidence and the law. How can one reach a just verdict when truth is elusive and evidence is flawed? This guide provides a disciplined framework for navigating uncertainty and resisting bias to master the art of fair decision-making. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798182791755
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : California Books, Miami, FL, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur I-9798182791755
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L0-9798182791755
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L0-9798182791755
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australie
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. What does a fair juror actually do when the evidence is incomplete, the witnesses disagree, and certainty is impossible?In the Jury Box: How Jurors Evaluate Evidence, Resist Bias, and Reach a Fair Decision is a practical guide to the reasoning demands of jury service. John S. Pritchett examines how jurors can evaluate testimony, documents, physical and digital evidence, expert opinions, eyewitness memory, inconsistencies, missing evidence, and competing narratives without allowing confidence, emotion, assumptions, or courtroom performance to substitute for proof.The book's central idea is "bounded judgment" jurors must decide from the evidence admitted in court, the law provided by the judge, and the burden of proof-without pretending they can know everything that happened.Through clear examples drawn from criminal and civil disputes, the book explores the difference between evidence and story, direct and circumstantial evidence, what a particular piece of evidence actually proves, how gaps in the record should be treated, why eyewitness certainty can mislead, how expert authority can influence judgment, and how bias often operates through ordinary expectations rather than obvious prejudice.Later chapters turn to the jury room itself: burdens of proof, reasonable doubt, combining evidence, resisting premature conclusions, disagreement, responsible dissent, unanimity, compromise, and the challenge of reaching a verdict without demanding impossible certainty.This is not a manual for reaching a particular verdict. It is a guide to thinking carefully about what has been proved, what remains uncertain, and what the law actually asks jurors to decide.Written for prospective jurors, former jurors, students, educators, and readers interested in courts, evidence, critical thinking, and decision-making, In the Jury Box offers a disciplined framework for fair judgment under uncertainty.A fair verdict does not require perfect knowledge. It requires careful reasoning within the limits of the evidence and the law. How can one reach a just verdict when truth is elusive and evidence is flawed? This guide provides a disciplined framework for navigating uncertainty and resisting bias to master the art of fair decision-making. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798182791755
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : CitiRetail, Stevenage, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. What does a fair juror actually do when the evidence is incomplete, the witnesses disagree, and certainty is impossible?In the Jury Box: How Jurors Evaluate Evidence, Resist Bias, and Reach a Fair Decision is a practical guide to the reasoning demands of jury service. John S. Pritchett examines how jurors can evaluate testimony, documents, physical and digital evidence, expert opinions, eyewitness memory, inconsistencies, missing evidence, and competing narratives without allowing confidence, emotion, assumptions, or courtroom performance to substitute for proof.The book's central idea is "bounded judgment" jurors must decide from the evidence admitted in court, the law provided by the judge, and the burden of proof-without pretending they can know everything that happened.Through clear examples drawn from criminal and civil disputes, the book explores the difference between evidence and story, direct and circumstantial evidence, what a particular piece of evidence actually proves, how gaps in the record should be treated, why eyewitness certainty can mislead, how expert authority can influence judgment, and how bias often operates through ordinary expectations rather than obvious prejudice.Later chapters turn to the jury room itself: burdens of proof, reasonable doubt, combining evidence, resisting premature conclusions, disagreement, responsible dissent, unanimity, compromise, and the challenge of reaching a verdict without demanding impossible certainty.This is not a manual for reaching a particular verdict. It is a guide to thinking carefully about what has been proved, what remains uncertain, and what the law actually asks jurors to decide.Written for prospective jurors, former jurors, students, educators, and readers interested in courts, evidence, critical thinking, and decision-making, In the Jury Box offers a disciplined framework for fair judgment under uncertainty.A fair verdict does not require perfect knowledge. It requires careful reasoning within the limits of the evidence and the law. How can one reach a just verdict when truth is elusive and evidence is flawed? This guide provides a disciplined framework for navigating uncertainty and resisting bias to master the art of fair decision-making. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798182791755
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware - What does a fair juror actually do when the evidence is incomplete, the witnesses disagree, and certainty is impossible In the Jury Box: How Jurors Evaluate Evidence, Resist Bias, and Reach a Fair Decision is a practical guide to the reasoning demands of jury service. John S. Pritchett examines how jurors can evaluate testimony, documents, physical and digital evidence, expert opinions, eyewitness memory, inconsistencies, missing evidence, and competing narratives without allowing confidence, emotion, assumptions, or courtroom performance to substitute for proof.The book's central idea is 'bounded judgment' jurors must decide from the evidence admitted in court, the law provided by the judge, and the burden of proof-without pretending they can know everything that happened.Through clear examples drawn from criminal and civil disputes, the book explores the difference between evidence and story, direct and circumstantial evidence, what a particular piece of evidence actually proves, how gaps in the record should be treated, why eyewitness certainty can mislead, how expert authority can influence judgment, and how bias often operates through ordinary expectations rather than obvious prejudice.Later chapters turn to the jury room itself: burdens of proof, reasonable doubt, combining evidence, resisting premature conclusions, disagreement, responsible dissent, unanimity, compromise, and the challenge of reaching a verdict without demanding impossible certainty.This is not a manual for reaching a particular verdict. It is a guide to thinking carefully about what has been proved, what remains uncertain, and what the law actually asks jurors to decide.Written for prospective jurors, former jurors, students, educators, and readers interested in courts, evidence, critical thinking, and decision-making, In the Jury Box offers a disciplined framework for fair judgment under uncertainty.A fair verdict does not require perfect knowledge. It requires careful reasoning within the limits of the evidence and the law. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798182791755
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)