A clock that runs four minutes slow is defective, but no one asks it to explain itself. People are different. We ask one another for reasons, accept excuses, withdraw trust, and sometimes say: you should have known better.
What, if anything, gives such a demand its force?
The Foundation of Knowing begins with the regress of justification and distinguishes epistemic defect from responsibility, blame, wronging, and answerability. It then compares five accounts of the standing behind a demand for reasons: objective normative truth, rational agency, reciprocal authority, social practice, and an unconditioned personal ground. The book does not claim a deductive proof or pretend that the rival accounts have been defeated.
The inquiry then turns to the biblical formula "I AM THAT I AM," asking what would count as an address and what the historical evidence can actually establish.
In Part IV, the author places his own conviction of calling under the same standards, testing it against chronology, contemporaneous records, clinical assessments, a veterinary record, Christian theology, and the strongest available human explanation.
A philosophical and autobiographical inquiry for readers interested in epistemology, philosophy of religion, faith and reason, religious experience, and the ethics of belief.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : California Books, Miami, FL, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. Print on Demand. N° de réf. du vendeur I-9798188573690
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L2-9798188573690
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L2-9798188573690
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : CitiRetail, Stevenage, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. A clock that runs four minutes slow is defective, but no one asks it to explain itself. People are different. We ask one another for reasons, accept excuses, withdraw trust, and sometimes say: you should have known better. What, if anything, gives such a demand its force? The Foundation of Knowing begins with the regress of justification and distinguishes epistemic defect from responsibility, blame, wronging, and answerability. It then compares five accounts of the standing behind a demand for reasons: objective normative truth, rational agency, reciprocal authority, social practice, and an unconditioned personal ground. The book does not claim a deductive proof or pretend that the rival accounts have been defeated. The inquiry then turns to the biblical formula "I AM THAT I AM," asking what would count as an address and what the historical evidence can actually establish. In Part IV, the author places his own conviction of calling under the same standards, testing it against chronology, contemporaneous records, clinical assessments, a veterinary record, Christian theology, and the strongest available human explanation. A philosophical and autobiographical inquiry for readers interested in epistemology, philosophy of religion, faith and reason, religious experience, and the ethics of belief. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798188573690
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)