At the Granicus, the campaign in Asia ceased to be an intention and became a fact of war. In 334 B.C., Alexander III of Macedon did not merely enter Persian territory; he forced the empire to contest his advance at the first major barrier on the invasion route. At the Granicus River, the western satraps sought to halt the invasion before it gathered momentum, using cavalry shock at the riverbank and depth behind the line to break the Macedonian assault before a foothold could be secured. This book examines the Battle of Granicus not as a reckless charge by a young king, but as a calculated act of operational violence. It was the first great test of Alexander's method: whether a commander could force a defended river crossing, absorb the shock of close combat under adverse conditions, and turn battlefield success into strategic rupture. The engagement established, from the outset, the tempo and character of the entire campaign. At the center stands Alexander - not as an icon of conquest, but as a battlefield commander imposing decision through speed, concentration, and personal intervention at the decisive point. His attack on the Macedonian right, the progressive engagement of the line, and the commitment of the phalanx after the cavalry struggle reveal an army designed not simply to win battles, but to destabilize enemy command cohesion before the wider campaign had properly begun. The Macedonian army prevailed through unity of command, tight coordination between cavalry and infantry, and immediate exploitation once the Persian mounted line lost cohesion. The Persian position, though formidable in appearance, contained a fatal structural weakness: its cavalry was committed forward at the riverbank while the Greek mercenary infantry in the rear could not determine the issue before the mounted struggle had already been decided. The result was not an accidental collapse, but the progressive breakdown of a defensive system that failed at the decisive point. Granicus demonstrates a central principle of war: when initiative, cohesion, and timing are concentrated at the right sector, even a difficult frontal assault can produce disproportionate strategic effect. Once the Persian cavalry line gave way and the Macedonians secured the far bank, the battle ceased to be a contested crossing and became a controlled destruction of the Persian position. The annihilation of much of the Greek mercenary infantry completed the victory and opened western Asia Minor to rapid exploitation. Drawing on Arrian, Diodorus, Plutarch, and modern military analysis, this study reconstructs the engagement in detail, from the strategic opening of the Asian campaign and the Persian decision to accept battle at the river, to the assault itself, the collapse of the Persian line, and the wider consequences of the victory for the conquest of Asia Minor. This book is written for readers of military history, strategy, and operational art who want disciplined analysis rather than heroic simplification. Granicus was not merely the first victory. It was the moment Alexander seized the initiative in Asia and never surrendered it.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Antonis Athenaeus is a Greek military officer and author with a lifelong dedication to history and strategy. Drawing on both his professional experience and academic background, he brings ancient battles to life through vivid narrative and modern strategic analysis.
He is the creator of the series Epic Battles of the Ancient World, where each volume explores a decisive clash of antiquity and the timeless lessons of leadership and resilience that still resonate today.
Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 53220723-n
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : California Books, Miami, FL, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur I-9798233831683
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Etats-Unis
Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition. N° de réf. du vendeur 53220723
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Etats-Unis
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. At the Granicus, the campaign in Asia ceased to be an intention and became a fact of war.In 334 B.C., Alexander III of Macedon did not merely enter Persian territory; he forced the empire to contest his advance at the first major barrier on the invasion route. At the Granicus River, the western satraps sought to halt the invasion before it gathered momentum, using cavalry shock at the riverbank and depth behind the line to break the Macedonian assault before a foothold could be secured.This book examines the Battle of Granicus not as a reckless charge by a young king, but as a calculated act of operational violence. It was the first great test of Alexander's method: whether a commander could force a defended river crossing, absorb the shock of close combat under adverse conditions, and turn battlefield success into strategic rupture. The engagement established, from the outset, the tempo and character of the entire campaign.At the center stands Alexander - not as an icon of conquest, but as a battlefield commander imposing decision through speed, concentration, and personal intervention at the decisive point. His attack on the Macedonian right, the progressive engagement of the line, and the commitment of the phalanx after the cavalry struggle reveal an army designed not simply to win battles, but to destabilize enemy command cohesion before the wider campaign had properly begun.The Macedonian army prevailed through unity of command, tight coordination between cavalry and infantry, and immediate exploitation once the Persian mounted line lost cohesion. The Persian position, though formidable in appearance, contained a fatal structural weakness: its cavalry was committed forward at the riverbank while the Greek mercenary infantry in the rear could not determine the issue before the mounted struggle had already been decided. The result was not an accidental collapse, but the progressive breakdown of a defensive system that failed at the decisive point.Granicus demonstrates a central principle of war: when initiative, cohesion, and timing are concentrated at the right sector, even a difficult frontal assault can produce disproportionate strategic effect. Once the Persian cavalry line gave way and the Macedonians secured the far bank, the battle ceased to be a contested crossing and became a controlled destruction of the Persian position. The annihilation of much of the Greek mercenary infantry completed the victory and opened western Asia Minor to rapid exploitation.Drawing on Arrian, Diodorus, Plutarch, and modern military analysis, this study reconstructs the engagement in detail, from the strategic opening of the Asian campaign and the Persian decision to accept battle at the river, to the assault itself, the collapse of the Persian line, and the wider consequences of the victory for the conquest of Asia Minor.This book is written for readers of military history, strategy, and operational art who want disciplined analysis rather than heroic simplification.Granicus was not merely the first victory. It was the moment Alexander seized the initiative in Asia and never surrendered it. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798233831683
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Etats-Unis
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L2-9798233831683
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L2-9798233831683
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Royaume-Uni
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur 53220723-n
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Royaume-Uni
Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition. N° de réf. du vendeur 53220723
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : CitiRetail, Stevenage, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. At the Granicus, the campaign in Asia ceased to be an intention and became a fact of war.In 334 B.C., Alexander III of Macedon did not merely enter Persian territory; he forced the empire to contest his advance at the first major barrier on the invasion route. At the Granicus River, the western satraps sought to halt the invasion before it gathered momentum, using cavalry shock at the riverbank and depth behind the line to break the Macedonian assault before a foothold could be secured.This book examines the Battle of Granicus not as a reckless charge by a young king, but as a calculated act of operational violence. It was the first great test of Alexander's method: whether a commander could force a defended river crossing, absorb the shock of close combat under adverse conditions, and turn battlefield success into strategic rupture. The engagement established, from the outset, the tempo and character of the entire campaign.At the center stands Alexander - not as an icon of conquest, but as a battlefield commander imposing decision through speed, concentration, and personal intervention at the decisive point. His attack on the Macedonian right, the progressive engagement of the line, and the commitment of the phalanx after the cavalry struggle reveal an army designed not simply to win battles, but to destabilize enemy command cohesion before the wider campaign had properly begun.The Macedonian army prevailed through unity of command, tight coordination between cavalry and infantry, and immediate exploitation once the Persian mounted line lost cohesion. The Persian position, though formidable in appearance, contained a fatal structural weakness: its cavalry was committed forward at the riverbank while the Greek mercenary infantry in the rear could not determine the issue before the mounted struggle had already been decided. The result was not an accidental collapse, but the progressive breakdown of a defensive system that failed at the decisive point.Granicus demonstrates a central principle of war: when initiative, cohesion, and timing are concentrated at the right sector, even a difficult frontal assault can produce disproportionate strategic effect. Once the Persian cavalry line gave way and the Macedonians secured the far bank, the battle ceased to be a contested crossing and became a controlled destruction of the Persian position. The annihilation of much of the Greek mercenary infantry completed the victory and opened western Asia Minor to rapid exploitation.Drawing on Arrian, Diodorus, Plutarch, and modern military analysis, this study reconstructs the engagement in detail, from the strategic opening of the Asian campaign and the Persian decision to accept battle at the river, to the assault itself, the collapse of the Persian line, and the wider consequences of the victory for the conquest of Asia Minor.This book is written for readers of military history, strategy, and operational art who want disciplined analysis rather than heroic simplification.Granicus was not merely the first victory. It was the moment Alexander seized the initiative in Asia and never surrendered it. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798233831683
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australie
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. At the Granicus, the campaign in Asia ceased to be an intention and became a fact of war.In 334 B.C., Alexander III of Macedon did not merely enter Persian territory; he forced the empire to contest his advance at the first major barrier on the invasion route. At the Granicus River, the western satraps sought to halt the invasion before it gathered momentum, using cavalry shock at the riverbank and depth behind the line to break the Macedonian assault before a foothold could be secured.This book examines the Battle of Granicus not as a reckless charge by a young king, but as a calculated act of operational violence. It was the first great test of Alexander's method: whether a commander could force a defended river crossing, absorb the shock of close combat under adverse conditions, and turn battlefield success into strategic rupture. The engagement established, from the outset, the tempo and character of the entire campaign.At the center stands Alexander - not as an icon of conquest, but as a battlefield commander imposing decision through speed, concentration, and personal intervention at the decisive point. His attack on the Macedonian right, the progressive engagement of the line, and the commitment of the phalanx after the cavalry struggle reveal an army designed not simply to win battles, but to destabilize enemy command cohesion before the wider campaign had properly begun.The Macedonian army prevailed through unity of command, tight coordination between cavalry and infantry, and immediate exploitation once the Persian mounted line lost cohesion. The Persian position, though formidable in appearance, contained a fatal structural weakness: its cavalry was committed forward at the riverbank while the Greek mercenary infantry in the rear could not determine the issue before the mounted struggle had already been decided. The result was not an accidental collapse, but the progressive breakdown of a defensive system that failed at the decisive point.Granicus demonstrates a central principle of war: when initiative, cohesion, and timing are concentrated at the right sector, even a difficult frontal assault can produce disproportionate strategic effect. Once the Persian cavalry line gave way and the Macedonians secured the far bank, the battle ceased to be a contested crossing and became a controlled destruction of the Persian position. The annihilation of much of the Greek mercenary infantry completed the victory and opened western Asia Minor to rapid exploitation.Drawing on Arrian, Diodorus, Plutarch, and modern military analysis, this study reconstructs the engagement in detail, from the strategic opening of the Asian campaign and the Persian decision to accept battle at the river, to the assault itself, the collapse of the Persian line, and the wider consequences of the victory for the conquest of Asia Minor.This book is written for readers of military history, strategy, and operational art who want disciplined analysis rather than heroic simplification.Granicus was not merely the first victory. It was the moment Alexander seized the initiative in Asia and never surrendered it. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798233831683
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)