The Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 was celebrated for its ground-breaking legal framework, which empowered those who lacked mental capacity and protected them from unlawful treatment. However, in less than 10 years since the implementation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), the House of Lords has established a post-legislative scrutiny committee to engage in an overhaul of DOLS in their entirety. With the Government having turned to the Law Commission to draft a new bill to replace DOLS, the question is raised as to why DOLS suffered such ill fate and what is going to replace them.
The fundamental changes proposed to the MCA 2005 are within the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill (MCAB) – the Bill drafted by the Law Commission containing the new framework aimed to replace DOLS, the Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS). Having been amended over ten stages of scrutiny between the House of Lords and the House of Commons, LPS has now passed Royal Assent. This dissertation proposes that although correct in the decision to overhaul the flawed DOLS framework, the Government have not yet achieved the essential purpose of LPS in the current iteration of the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill – that is to balance the protection of incapacitated individuals’ Article 5 right to liberty with a practical framework of operation.
This piece explores the following:
Do the Liberty Protection Safeguards go far enough?
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : WorldofBooks, Goring-By-Sea, WS, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : Very Good. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged. N° de réf. du vendeur GOR012210675
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)