Every dashboard shows green. Every control functions. And you still cannot prove what your AI is doing.
You built a real security program. Patch cycles that run on schedule. Zero trust that took two years to implement correctly. Incident response playbooks tested under pressure. Then, somewhere in the last eighteen months, AI agents, MCP servers, embedded vendor features, and autonomous tools walked into your environment faster than your operating model could absorb them. That is not a failure of effort. It is a failure of speed.
Now a question is forming. It comes from a regulator, an audit committee, an insurer, or an enterprise customer expanding its security questionnaire. It always means the same thing: can you prove your AI exposure is known, controlled, and governed? Evidence, documented, dated, scored, and defensible, is something else entirely. This book closes that gap.
THE GREEN DASHBOARD FALLACYNone of your dashboards are lying. The problem is structural: they were all designed before AI agents entered your environment at scale. The fallacy is not a detection failure. It is an assumption failure. The greatest AI security risk facing your organization is not that you are undefended. It is that leadership believes the existing program is already watching.
WHAT YOU PRODUCESix artifacts built to survive a regulator, an insurer, an auditor, an enterprise customer, or your own audit committee:
These are not concepts to understand. They are documents to hand over.
THE METHODThree instruments carry the audit. The Visibility Triangle sorts every gap into visible, suspected, or undetectable, and the zone determines the response. The Six-Domain Operating View structures the work across governance, security operations, architecture, application security, third-party risk, and data protection. The Defensible AI Security Baseline sets a dated, scored standard across seven areas with a named owner for each, which turns a one-time audit into a program.
Seven binding frameworks run underneath: NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, the OWASP LLM and Agentic Top 10, OWASP AIVSS, MITRE ATLAS, HITRUST AI, and Google SAIF. They are cited only where they actually bind, never as a compliance tour.
The engineering thesis is stated plainly. AI agents must be audited as privileged, non-human actors inside your control environment. Once an agent can retrieve data, invoke tools, write records, or trigger workflows, it is an operational actor with an identity, a privilege scope, and a blast radius. Your access review was built for human identities with enumerable behavior. It was not built for this.
Every domain chapter closes the same way: the Board Question your leadership must answer, the Evidence Required to answer it, the Common Failure Pattern that breaks the answer, and a 30-Day Move with a named output, a named owner, and a completion condition.
There is no vendor agenda here. No products are recommended. Its only job is to help you produce evidence that survives whoever asks the question first.
Volume V of The Operating Discipline for AI Library, and the opening volume of Pillar II, AI Risk Governance and Security. It extends Volumes I through IV and stands on its own. The executive who finishes this book walks into the next board meeting holding proof, not promises.
Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.
Vendeur : California Books, Miami, FL, Etats-Unis
Etat : New. N° de réf. du vendeur I-9798996940226
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Etats-Unis
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. You built a real security program. Patch cycles on schedule, zero trust implemented correctly, incident response tested under pressure. Then AI agents, MCP servers, embedded vendor features, and autonomous tools walked into your environment faster than your operating model could absorb them. That is not a failure of effort. It is a failure of speed. Now a question is forming, from a regulator, an audit committee, an insurer, or an enterprise customer expanding its security questionnaire: can you prove your AI exposure is known, controlled, and governed? Every dashboard shows green, and none of them are lying. Every control functions. But none of those tools were built to watch what AI agents do inside your environment, because they were designed before AI agents entered it at scale. This is the Green Dashboard Fallacy. It is not a detection failure, it is an assumption failure. The greatest AI security risk facing your organization is not that you are undefended. It is that leadership believes the existing program is already watching. The audit produces six artifacts built to survive outside scrutiny: an AI exposure map across the six CISO domains, a non-human identity inventory and agent boundary matrix, a tested AI Red Button procedure, an AI vendor tier map and data flow map, a regulatory crosswalk, and a four-page board pack. These are not concepts to understand. They are documents to hand over. Three instruments carry the method. The Visibility Triangle sorts every gap into visible, suspected, or undetectable. The Six-Domain Operating View structures the work across governance, security operations, architecture, application security, third-party risk, and data protection. The Defensible AI Security Baseline sets a dated, scored standard across seven areas with a named owner for each, which turns a one-time audit into a program. Seven binding frameworks run underneath: NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, the OWASP LLM and Agentic Top 10, OWASP AIVSS, MITRE ATLAS, HITRUST AI, and Google SAIF. The thesis is stated plainly. AI agents must be audited as privileged, non-human actors inside your control environment. Once an agent can retrieve data, invoke tools, write records, or trigger workflows, it is an operational actor with an identity, a privilege scope, and a blast radius. No products are recommended and the book does not end in a pitch. Volume V of The Operating Discipline for AI Library, and the opening volume of Pillar II, AI Risk Governance and Security. The timeline belongs to whoever moves first. Every dashboard is green, and none of them were built to watch your AI. A CISO audit method that produces six artifacts, a scored baseline, and a four-page board pack: proof your AI exposure is known, controlled, and governed. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798996940226
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Royaume-Uni
PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. N° de réf. du vendeur L2-9798996940226
Quantité disponible : Plus de 20 disponibles
Vendeur : CitiRetail, Stevenage, Royaume-Uni
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. You built a real security program. Patch cycles on schedule, zero trust implemented correctly, incident response tested under pressure. Then AI agents, MCP servers, embedded vendor features, and autonomous tools walked into your environment faster than your operating model could absorb them. That is not a failure of effort. It is a failure of speed. Now a question is forming, from a regulator, an audit committee, an insurer, or an enterprise customer expanding its security questionnaire: can you prove your AI exposure is known, controlled, and governed? Every dashboard shows green, and none of them are lying. Every control functions. But none of those tools were built to watch what AI agents do inside your environment, because they were designed before AI agents entered it at scale. This is the Green Dashboard Fallacy. It is not a detection failure, it is an assumption failure. The greatest AI security risk facing your organization is not that you are undefended. It is that leadership believes the existing program is already watching. The audit produces six artifacts built to survive outside scrutiny: an AI exposure map across the six CISO domains, a non-human identity inventory and agent boundary matrix, a tested AI Red Button procedure, an AI vendor tier map and data flow map, a regulatory crosswalk, and a four-page board pack. These are not concepts to understand. They are documents to hand over. Three instruments carry the method. The Visibility Triangle sorts every gap into visible, suspected, or undetectable. The Six-Domain Operating View structures the work across governance, security operations, architecture, application security, third-party risk, and data protection. The Defensible AI Security Baseline sets a dated, scored standard across seven areas with a named owner for each, which turns a one-time audit into a program. Seven binding frameworks run underneath: NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, the OWASP LLM and Agentic Top 10, OWASP AIVSS, MITRE ATLAS, HITRUST AI, and Google SAIF. The thesis is stated plainly. AI agents must be audited as privileged, non-human actors inside your control environment. Once an agent can retrieve data, invoke tools, write records, or trigger workflows, it is an operational actor with an identity, a privilege scope, and a blast radius. No products are recommended and the book does not end in a pitch. Volume V of The Operating Discipline for AI Library, and the opening volume of Pillar II, AI Risk Governance and Security. The timeline belongs to whoever moves first. Every dashboard is green, and none of them were built to watch your AI. A CISO audit method that produces six artifacts, a scored baseline, and a four-page board pack: proof your AI exposure is known, controlled, and governed. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798996940226
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - You built a real security program. Patch cycles on schedule, zero trust implemented correctly, incident response tested under pressure. Then AI agents, MCP servers, embedded vendor features, and autonomous tools walked into your environment faster than your operating model could absorb them. That is not a failure of effort. It is a failure of speed. Now a question is forming, from a regulator, an audit committee, an insurer, or an enterprise customer expanding its security questionnaire: can you prove your AI exposure is known, controlled, and governed Every dashboard shows green, and none of them are lying. Every control functions. But none of those tools were built to watch what AI agents do inside your environment, because they were designed before AI agents entered it at scale. This is the Green Dashboard Fallacy. It is not a detection failure, it is an assumption failure. The greatest AI security risk facing your organization is not that you are undefended. It is that leadership believes the existing program is already watching. The audit produces six artifacts built to survive outside scrutiny: an AI exposure map across the six CISO domains, a non-human identity inventory and agent boundary matrix, a tested AI Red Button procedure, an AI vendor tier map and data flow map, a regulatory crosswalk, and a four-page board pack. These are not concepts to understand. They are documents to hand over. Three instruments carry the method. The Visibility Triangle sorts every gap into visible, suspected, or undetectable. The Six-Domain Operating View structures the work across governance, security operations, architecture, application security, third-party risk, and data protection. The Defensible AI Security Baseline sets a dated, scored standard across seven areas with a named owner for each, which turns a one-time audit into a program. Seven binding frameworks run underneath: NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, the OWASP LLM and Agentic Top 10, OWASP AIVSS, MITRE ATLAS, HITRUST AI, and Google SAIF. The thesis is stated plainly. AI agents must be audited as privileged, non-human actors inside your control environment. Once an agent can retrieve data, invoke tools, write records, or trigger workflows, it is an operational actor with an identity, a privilege scope, and a blast radius. No products are recommended and the book does not end in a pitch. Volume V of The Operating Discipline for AI Library, and the opening volume of Pillar II, AI Risk Governance and Security. The timeline belongs to whoever moves first. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798996940226
Quantité disponible : 2 disponible(s)
Vendeur : AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australie
Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. You built a real security program. Patch cycles on schedule, zero trust implemented correctly, incident response tested under pressure. Then AI agents, MCP servers, embedded vendor features, and autonomous tools walked into your environment faster than your operating model could absorb them. That is not a failure of effort. It is a failure of speed. Now a question is forming, from a regulator, an audit committee, an insurer, or an enterprise customer expanding its security questionnaire: can you prove your AI exposure is known, controlled, and governed? Every dashboard shows green, and none of them are lying. Every control functions. But none of those tools were built to watch what AI agents do inside your environment, because they were designed before AI agents entered it at scale. This is the Green Dashboard Fallacy. It is not a detection failure, it is an assumption failure. The greatest AI security risk facing your organization is not that you are undefended. It is that leadership believes the existing program is already watching. The audit produces six artifacts built to survive outside scrutiny: an AI exposure map across the six CISO domains, a non-human identity inventory and agent boundary matrix, a tested AI Red Button procedure, an AI vendor tier map and data flow map, a regulatory crosswalk, and a four-page board pack. These are not concepts to understand. They are documents to hand over. Three instruments carry the method. The Visibility Triangle sorts every gap into visible, suspected, or undetectable. The Six-Domain Operating View structures the work across governance, security operations, architecture, application security, third-party risk, and data protection. The Defensible AI Security Baseline sets a dated, scored standard across seven areas with a named owner for each, which turns a one-time audit into a program. Seven binding frameworks run underneath: NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, the OWASP LLM and Agentic Top 10, OWASP AIVSS, MITRE ATLAS, HITRUST AI, and Google SAIF. The thesis is stated plainly. AI agents must be audited as privileged, non-human actors inside your control environment. Once an agent can retrieve data, invoke tools, write records, or trigger workflows, it is an operational actor with an identity, a privilege scope, and a blast radius. No products are recommended and the book does not end in a pitch. Volume V of The Operating Discipline for AI Library, and the opening volume of Pillar II, AI Risk Governance and Security. The timeline belongs to whoever moves first. Every dashboard is green, and none of them were built to watch your AI. A CISO audit method that produces six artifacts, a scored baseline, and a four-page board pack: proof your AI exposure is known, controlled, and governed. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. N° de réf. du vendeur 9798996940226
Quantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Vendeur : preigu, Osnabrück, Allemagne
Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. The AI IT Security Audit(TM) | Stephen R Jordan | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2026 | SRJ Consulting & Services Publishing | EAN 9798996940226 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. N° de réf. du vendeur 136367870
Quantité disponible : 5 disponible(s)