From Discourse to Logic

U. Reyle

ISBN 10: 079232403X / ISBN 13: 9780792324034

Edité par Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands Jul 1993, 1993

A propos de cet article

Neuware -Preface This book is about semantics and logic. More specifically, it is about the semantics and logic of natural language; and, even more specifically than that, it is about a particular way of dealing with those subjects, known as Discourse Representation Theory, or DRT. DRT is an approach towards natural language semantics which, some thirteen years ago, arose out of attempts to deal with two distinct problems. The first of those was the semantic puzzle that had been brought to contempo rary attention by Geach's notorious 'donkey sentences' - sentences like If Pedro owns some donkey, he beats it, in which the anaphoric connection we perceive between the indefinite noun phrase some donkey and the pronoun it may seem to conflict with the existential meaning of the word some. The second problem had to do with tense and aspect. Some languages, for instance French and the other Romance languages, have two morphologically distinct past tenses, a simple past (the French Passe Simple) and a continuous past (the French Imparfait). To articulate precisely what the difference between these tenses is has turned out to be surprisingly difficult.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 738 pp. Englisch.

N° de réf. du vendeur 9780792324034

Détails bibliographiques

• Titre: From Discourse to Logic
• Éditeur: Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands Jul 1993
• Date de parution: 1993
• Langue: anglais
• ISBN à 10 chiffres: 079232403X
• ISBN à 13 chiffres: 9780792324034
• Reliure: Buch
• État de l'article: Neu

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis

Preface This book is about semantics and logic. More specifically, it is about the semantics and logic of natural language; and, even more specifically than that, it is about a particular way of dealing with those subjects, known as Discourse Representation Theory, or DRT. DRT is an approach towards natural language semantics which, some thirteen years ago, arose out of attempts to deal with two distinct problems. The first of those was the semantic puzzle that had been brought to contempo- rary attention by Geach's notorious "donkey sentences" - sentences like If Pedro owns some donkey, he beats it, in which the anaphoric connection we perceive between the indefinite noun phrase some donkey and the pronoun it may seem to conflict with the existential meaning of the word some. The second problem had to do with tense and aspect. Some languages, for instance French and the other Romance languages, have two morphologically distinct past tenses, a simple past (the French Passe Simple) and a continuous past (the French Imparfait). To articulate precisely what the difference between these tenses is has turned out to be surprisingly difficult.