Frontier Passages : Ethnopolitics and the Rise of Chinese Communism, 1921-1945

Xiaoyuan Liu

ISBN 10: 0804749604 / ISBN 13: 9780804749602

Edité par Stanford University Press Nov 2003, 2003

A propos de cet article

Neuware - In this pathbreaking book, Xiaoyuan Liu establishes the ways in which the history of the Chinese Communist Party was, from the Yan'an period onward, intertwined with the ethnopolitics of the Chinese 'periphery.' As a Han-dominated party, the CCP had to adapt to an inhospitable political environment, particularly among the Hui (Muslims) of northwest China and the Mongols of Inner Mongolia. Based on a careful examination of CCP and Soviet Comintern documents only recently available, Liu's study shows why the CCP found itself unable to follow the Russian Bolshevik precedent by inciting separatism among the non-Han peoples as a stratagem for gaining national power. Rather than swallowing Marxist-Leninist dogma on 'the nationalities question,' the CCP took a position closer to that of the Kuomintang, stressing the inclusiveness of the Han-dominated Chinese nation, 'Zhongua Minzu.'.

N° de réf. du vendeur 9780804749602

Détails bibliographiques

• Titre: Frontier Passages : Ethnopolitics and the Rise of Chinese Communism, 1921-1945
• Éditeur: Stanford University Press Nov 2003
• Date de parution: 2003
• Langue: anglais
• ISBN à 10 chiffres: 0804749604
• ISBN à 13 chiffres: 9780804749602
• Reliure: Buch
• État de l'article: Neu
• Dimensions: 240 L x 159 H x 23 P (en millimètres) 240 millimètres de largeur par 159 millimètres de hauteur par 23 millimètres de profondeur
• Poids: 549 grammes

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis

In this pathbreaking book, Xiaoyuan Liu establishes the ways in which the history of the Chinese Communist Party was, from the Yan'an period onward, intertwined with the ethnopolitics of the Chinese "periphery." As a Han-dominated party, the CCP had to adapt to an inhospitable political environment, particularly among the Hui (Muslims) of northwest China and the Mongols of Inner Mongolia. Based on a careful examination of CCP and Soviet Comintern documents only recently available, Liu's study shows why the CCP found itself unable to follow the Russian Bolshevik precedent by inciting separatism among the non-Han peoples as a stratagem for gaining national power. Rather than swallowing Marxist-Leninist dogma on "the nationalities question," the CCP took a position closer to that of the Kuomintang, stressing the inclusiveness of the Han-dominated Chinese nation, "Zhongua Minzu."

À propos de l?auteur

Xiaoyuan Liu is an Associate Professor of History at Iowa State University and a recent Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington.