The Issue with British History (History: Fiction or Science?)

High time to repair history NASA research of earth-moon mechanics by astrophysicist Robert Newton leads mathematicians of MSU Dr. Fomenko to a breakthrough in the world chronology in general and history of Great Britain in particular. On the one hand, 'The Issue with British History' shows how much shorter than generally presumed it really is, but, on the other hand, it underscores the major role Great Britain played in World History. Indeed, England, a small non-significant and underpopulated province of the Great Evil Empire of Eurasia, stepped in the XVI century on its way to greatness, becomes within barely 300 years the World Empire that ruled the waves; where the sun never set down! Indeed again, the Isle of England was the first country where old nobility was replaced with new gentry loyal to its King, the first to confiscate most of the Catholic church riches, free itself from the clutches of Roman Curia, and to introduce literacy and basic sciences. After the rule of King Henry VIII that profoundly transformed England in 1509-1547 and the rule in 1553-1558 of Queen Maria I Bloody Mary, who tried and failed to return England to the Catholic fold, the re-establishment of Roman Catholicism was definitely reversed by in Elizabeth I that ruled in 1558-1603. During the 45-years of the Elizabethan Era, instead of dancing and dueling à la française, the Gentry was put to learning sciences, building the Royal Navy to ensure the British maritime supremacy, colonization, licensed piracy, and trade. Regretfully, British scholars of XVI-XVII th centuries based their historical writings on the consensual chronology of the French Kabbalist Scaliger and Jesuit Petavious.
Dr. Prof Fomenko et al. analyzed the English sources they used and put under scrutiny the consensual, i.e., Scaligerian version of the “ancient” and mediaeval chronology of Britain. His verdict: the British history is most likely to have been extended arbitrarily, and quite substantially so. The real documented history of England is a great deal shorter. Who and Why invented Antiquity and Dark Ages? ⦁By the middle of the XVI century, the prime political agenda of Europe that reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily to the Evil Empire of Eurasia, was to free Europe. ⦁The concerted effort of European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists, and scientists in XV-XVII centuries in the creation and dissemination of fictional Ancient World served this agenda. ⦁The fictional Ancient World was created by representing events of XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before, according to the ancient sources they invented. ⦁The European aristocracy, a considerable part of which were fugitives from Byzantine and/or the inheritors of Eurasian warlords, supported the myth of the Ancient World to justify its claims to countries they ruled. ⦁The black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants developed and supported the myth of the Ancient World to justify their claims of being more ancient and to separate themselves from Eurasian orthodoxy in the countries ruled by the European aristocracy. ⦁The scientists supported the myth of the Ancient World as a safe cover for their heretic research that produced results contrarian to the tenets of Christianity. They justified their discoveries by authorities of ancient scientists they invented and used as pseudonyms. https://evilempire.blog/ Luckily, the British learned scholars have the chance of the 5 years of scheduled repair of the clock to review the History of Great Britain adequately in line with the data presented by Dr. Anatoly Fomenko, Full Member (Academician) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Head of the Moscow State University Department of Mathematics.