Mathematical Modeling of the Hearing Process: Proceedings of the NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Held in Troy, NY, July 21 25, 1980: 43 (Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 43) [Paperback] Holmes, M.H. and Rubenfeld, L.A.

ISBN 10: 3540111557 / ISBN 13: 9783540111559

Edité par Springer, 1981

A propos de cet article

Some wear to the extremities of the book. A few marks to both sides. Inscription to inside page, content clean throughout.

N° de réf. du vendeur 127814-2

Détails bibliographiques

• Titre: Mathematical Modeling of the Hearing Process: Proceedings of the NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Held in Troy, NY, July 21 25, 1980: 43 (Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 43) [Paperback] Holmes, M.H. and Rubenfeld, L.A.
• Éditeur: Springer
• Date de parution: 1981
• Langue: anglais
• ISBN à 10 chiffres: 3540111557
• ISBN à 13 chiffres: 9783540111559
• Reliure: Couverture souple
• État de l'article: Very Good

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis

The articles of these proceedings arise from a NSF-CBMS regional conference on the mathematical modeling of the hearing process, that was held at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the summer of 1980. To put the a=ticles in perspective, it is best to briefly review the history of suc modeling. It has proceeded, more or less, in three stages. The first was initiated by Herman Helmholtz in the 1880's, whose theories dominated the subject for years. However, because of his lack of accurate experimental data and his heuristic arguments it became apparent that his models needed revision. Accordingly, based on the experimental observations of von Bekesy, the "long wave" theories were developed in the 1950's by investigators such as Zwislocki, Peterson, and Bogert. However, as the ex?eri ents became more refined (such as Rhode's wssbauer Measurements) even these models came into question. This has brought on a flurry of 'activity in recent years into how to extend the models to account for these more recent eXT. lerimental observations. One approach is through a device co monly refered to as a second filter (see Allen's article) and another is through a more elaborate hydroelastic model (see Chadwick's article). In conjunction with this latter approach, there has been some recent work on developing a low frequency model of the cochlea (see Holmes' article).