The Well Pled Civil Racketeering Complaint In Federal Court, An Attorneys Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 56 Shield Or Sword: A Litigation Survival Tool. Cet article n’est pas disponible.
Langue : anglais
Edité par Independently published, 2019
- Livre broché
- Neuf

Vendeur : Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Royaume-UniRia Christie Collections
Vendeur avec une évaluation de 5 étoiles
Vendeur AbeBooks depuis 25 mars 2015
Indisponible
Livre broché
Etat: Neuf
EUR 236,73
A propos de cet article
In English.
N° de réf. du vendeur ria9781670466990_new
- Titre
- The Well Pled Civil Racketeering Complaint In Federal Court, An Attorneys Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 56 Shield Or Sword: A Litigation Survival Tool
- Auteur
- Chartered, GhostWriter Paralegal; Pappacoda, JD, Joe
- Éditeur
- Independently published
- Année de publication
- 2019
- État de l'article
- New
- Reliure
- Couverture souple
- Langue
- anglais
- ISBN à 10 chiffres
- 167046699X
- ISBN à 13 chiffres
- 9781670466990
- Poids de l'article
- 288 grammes
GhostWriter Paralegal, Chartered is a legal research and complex technical litigation law office support organization located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. It is not a law firm. The topics included in this publication were critically analyzed for Attorneys who considered their veracity. For further information contact: www.GhostWriterParalegal.com. Joe Pappacoda is a former senior trial attorney, former prosecutor, and former special agent.The information provided in this publication is a recitation of excerpted information published in the federal cases cited; reformatted in logical sequence mirroring the legal technical requirements of a well pled federal RICO Complaint, as summarized in the table of contents. The second part of the book is a case study analysis, applying the principles learned from part 1 to specific factual averments made in an actual 2017 federal RICO Complaint filed by Geico against numerous health care providers, law firms, physicians, and attorneys, to examine whether technical RICO pleading requirements were met, and to foster critical thinking regarding other potential issues that could have been raised by defendants, that if raised, may have altered the outcome of that case.
« Synopsis » peut appartenir à une autre édition de cet ouvrage.