Progress in Planning, Volume 51, Part 1

Mee Kam Ng

ISBN 10: 0080435807 / ISBN 13: 9780080435800

Edité par Elsevier Science Jun 1999, 1999

A propos de cet article

This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This study compares urban planning mechanisms that operate within Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan. The political economy of Hong Kong is in a state of flux. While the power of the government and the corporate interests remain largely intact, they are challenged by pro-China interests and a democratizing civil society. The land use planning system reflects this power contest. In the face of both strong resistance from the development industry and China's eagerness to perpetuate a market-led society in post-1997 Hong Kong, the outcome of the power contest remains uncertain. The state-centred political economy of Singapore has bred a top-down land use planning system centrally controlled by the government. Not only has the government dominated the plan making process, the legislation has entrusted the public sector to scrutinize and guide private development through a discretionary development control system. 90 pp. Englisch. N° de réf. du vendeur 9780080435800

Détails bibliographiques

Titre : Progress in Planning, Volume 51, Part 1

Éditeur : Elsevier Science Jun 1999

Date d'édition : 1999

Reliure : Taschenbuch

Etat : Neu

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis :

This study compares urban planning mechanisms that operate within Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan. The political economy of Hong Kong is in a state of flux. While the power of the government and the corporate interests remain largely intact, they are challenged by pro-China interests and a democratizing civil society. The land use planning system reflects this power contest. In the face of both strong resistance from the development industry and China's eagerness to perpetuate a market-led society in post-1997 Hong Kong, the outcome of the power contest remains uncertain. The state-centred political economy of Singapore has bred a top-down land use planning system centrally controlled by the government. Not only has the government dominated the plan making process, the legislation has entrusted the public sector to scrutinize and guide private development through a discretionary development control system.