Toxicity Versus Proximity: X-Ray Crystallography,Nuclear Magnetic Spectroscopy, Infra Red Spectroscopy, Magnetic Susceptibility, Chn (Mass Analyzer). Cet article n’est pas disponible.
Langue : anglais
Edité par Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011
- Livre broché
- Neuf

Vendeur : Revaluation Books, Exeter, Royaume-UniRevaluation Books
Vendeur avec une évaluation de 5 étoiles
Vendeur AbeBooks depuis 6 janvier 2003
Indisponible
Livre broché
Etat: Neuf
EUR 102,74
A propos de cet article
64 pages. 8.66x5.91x0.15 inches. In Stock.
N° de réf. du vendeur __3846593494
- Titre
- Toxicity Versus Proximity: X-Ray Crystallography,Nuclear Magnetic Spectroscopy, Infra Red Spectroscopy, Magnetic Susceptibility, Chn (Mass Analyzer)
- Auteur
- Dhir, Vaneet; Dhand, Pooja; Dhir, Vaneet; Dhand, Pooja
- Éditeur
- Lap Lambert Academic Publishing
- Année de publication
- 2011
- État de l'article
- Brand New
- Reliure
- Paperback
- Langue
- anglais
- ISBN à 10 chiffres
- 3846593494
- ISBN à 13 chiffres
- 9783846593493
- Poids de l'article
- 0,14 kilogramme
This approach was made by Dhir et al. based on X-ray Crystallography in terms of Toxicity versus Proximity on the basis of Ligand preparation and characterization by Nuclear Magnetic Spectroscopy, Infra red spectroscopy, Magnetic Susceptibility & CHN(Mass Analyzer) Techniques. DETP & DPTP have been found to be similar potential toxic as they have been used in fungicides and other antibacterial products. Approach has been made on the basis of Biomimetics. The study reveals that Cu complexes are much more potentially toxic than lead compounds because in lead compounds ligands may occupy all the centres or corners of the Pb(I/II)metal ions and very less void is left to interact physiochemically with various proteins/ amino acids or DNA of living cell to disrupt their cycle to become potential toxic and carcinogenic in nature. Thus Pb(I/II)metal ions are very toxic with less hydrophobic group while Cu(II) complexes are very toxic with big/steric ligands as compared to small one. This fact is strengthened on the basis of X-ray Crystal structure of one of the Copper (II) complexes.
« Synopsis » peut appartenir à une autre édition de cet ouvrage.
Présentation de l'éditeur
This approach was made by Dhir et al. based on X-ray Crystallography in terms of Toxicity versus Proximity on the basis of Ligand preparation and characterization by Nuclear Magnetic Spectroscopy, Infra red spectroscopy, Magnetic Susceptibility & CHN(Mass Analyzer) Techniques. DETP & DPTP have been found to be similar potential toxic as they have been used in fungicides and other antibacterial products. Approach has been made on the basis of Biomimetics. The study reveals that Cu complexes are much more potentially toxic than lead compounds because in lead compounds ligands may occupy all the centres or corners of the Pb(I/II)metal ions and very less void is left to interact physiochemically with various proteins/ amino acids or DNA of living cell to disrupt their cycle to become potential toxic and carcinogenic in nature. Thus Pb(I/II)metal ions are very toxic with less hydrophobic group while Cu(II) complexes are very toxic with big/steric ligands as compared to small one. This fact is strengthened on the basis of X-ray Crystal structure of one of the Copper (II) complexes.
« A propos de ce titre » peut appartenir à une autre édition de cet ouvrage.