Transforming Unjust Structures: The Capability Approach

Deneulin, Severine (Editor) / Nebel, Mathias (Editor) / Sagovsky, Nicholas (Editor)

ISBN 10: 904817127X / ISBN 13: 9789048171279

Edité par Springer Netherlands, 2006

A propos de cet article

206 pages. 8.80x5.80x0.60 inches. In Stock. N° de réf. du vendeur x-904817127X

Détails bibliographiques

Titre : Transforming Unjust Structures: The ...

Éditeur : Springer Netherlands

Date d'édition : 2006

Reliure : Paperback

Etat : Brand New

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis :

SÉVERINE DENEULIN, MATHIAS NEBEL AND NICHOLAS SAGOVSKY TRANSFORMING UNJUST STRUCTURES The Capability Approach THE CAPABILITY APPROACH Structural injustice has traditionally been the concern of two major academic disciplines: economics and philosophy. The dominant model of economics has long been that of neo-classical economics. For neo-classical economists, human we- being is to be assessed by the availability of disposable income or according to goods consumed; it is measured by the levels of utility achieved in the consumption of commodities. Social order is fashioned by the ways consumers maximise their 1 well-being and enterprises maximise their profits. A core assumption is that all 2 commodities are commensurable: they can all be measured according to a single 3 numerical covering value, which is their price. Within this neo-classical paradigm, justice is achieved when the utility level of someone cannot be increased without 4 another person seeing his or her utility level decrease. The dominant paradigm of neo-classical economics was strongly challenged when development and welfare economist Amartya Sen received the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1998. His work offered an alternative to the neo-classical evaluation of human well-being in the utility/commodity space. The underlining philosophical intuition behind Sen’s work is that the standard of living lies in the living and not in the consumption of commodities. In searching for an alternative measure of human well-being, Sen devised his capability approach.