Undervalued Dissent : Informal Workers' Politics in India. Cet article n’est pas disponible.
Langue : anglais
Edité par State University of New York Press, 2017
- Livre broché
- Occasion

Vendeur : GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Etats-UnisGreatBookPrices
Vendeur AbeBooks depuis 6 avril 2009
Etat: Occasion - Comme neuf
EUR 36,50
A propos de cet article
Unread book in perfect condition.
N° de réf. du vendeur 29642992
- Titre
- Undervalued Dissent : Informal Workers' Politics in India
- Auteur
- Nair, Manjusha
- Éditeur
- State University of New York Press
- Année de publication
- 2017
- État de l'article
- As New
- Reliure
- Couverture souple
- Langue
- anglais
- ISBN à 10 chiffres
- 1438462468
- ISBN à 13 chiffres
- 9781438462462
- Série
- Livre 8 sur 12: SUNY series in Global Modernity
Uses two case studies to demonstrate how neoliberal reforms in India have de-democratized labor politics.
Honorable Mention, 2018 Global Division Book Award presented by the Global Division of the Society for the Study of Social Problems
Historically, the Indian state has not offered welfare and social rights to all of its citizens, yet a remarkable characteristic of its polity has been the ability of citizens to dissent in a democratic way. In Undervalued Dissent, Manjusha Nair argues that this democratic space has been vanishing slowly. Based on extensive fieldwork in Chhattisgarh, a regional state in central India, this book examines two different informal workers' movements. Informal workers are not part of organized labor unions and make up eighty-five percent of the Indian workforce. The first movement started in 1977 and was a success, while the other movement began in 1989 and still continues today, without success. The workers in both movements had similar backgrounds, skills, demands, and strategies. Nair maintains that the first movement succeeded because the workers contended within a labor regime that allowed space for democratic dissent, and the second movement failed because they contested within a widely altered labor regime following neoliberal reforms, where these spaces of democratic dissent were preempted. The key difference between the two regimes, Nair suggests, is not in the withdrawal of a prolabor state from its protective and regulatory role, as has been argued by many, but rather in the rise of a new kind of state that became functionally decentralized, economically predatory, and politically communalized. These changes, Nair concludes, successfully de-democratized labor politics in India.
« Synopsis » peut appartenir à une autre édition de cet ouvrage.
À propos de l’auteur
« A propos de ce titre » peut appartenir à une autre édition de cet ouvrage.