Unjust Enrichment : The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Restitution. With contr. in German

Langue : anglais

Edité par Duncker & Humblot, 1999

3428079825 / 9783428079827

Vendeur : AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, AllemagneAHA-BUCH GmbH

Vendeur avec une évaluation de 5 étoiles

Vendeur AbeBooks depuis 14 août 2006

Livre broché

Etat: Neuf

EUR 109,90

EUR 35,00 expédition 
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Quantité disponible : 2 disponibles

Ajouter au panier
Retours gratuits sous 30 jours

A propos de cet article

Neuware - '. to be consulted before any significant legal debate.' W. J. Stewart in: Scots Law Times 1995This volume is concerned with the history of the concept of, or of the remedies for, unjust enrichment in the Civil law and the Common law. But this history is radically different in the two systems - different both in the starting point of each system and in the methods by which progress from that starting point was made.What for the Civil law is the starting point is for the Common law the ultimate outcome. The Civil law from its earliest medieval beginnings had before its eyes, at least as a potential unifying principle, the concept of unjust enrichment which it found in the Corpus Iuris, whereas it is only very recently (and outside the chronological scope of this volume) that the Common law has come to accept such a principle.The methods by which the Civil lawyers progressed from their starting point towards the well articulated concepts of the modern law were those of the interpreter and elaborator of texts which had their own unquestioned authority. And their discussions, which were those of the scholar and the school-room, are well documented.For the Common lawyers, on the other hand, the starting point was nothing but the practice of the courts and their methods were those appropriate to that practice. The plaintiff's remedy in a particular case was everything. Moreover, since the practice of the courts until very recent times is very imperfectly evidenced, the course of the development of the Common law is often difficult to trace. The researches contained in this volume show that it is only with benefit of hindsight, and then only to very limited extent, that one can see that development as leading to the recent acceptance of a doctrine of unjust enrichment.; '. to be consulted before any significant legal debate.' W. J. Stewart in: Scots Law Times 1995This volume is concerned with the history of the concept of, or of the remedies for, unjust enrichment in the Civil law and the Common law. But this history is radically different in the two systems - different both in the starting point of each system and in the methods by which progress from that starting point was made.What for the Civil law is the starting point is for the Common law the ultimate outcome. The Civil law from its earliest medieval beginnings had before its eyes, at least as a potential unifying principle, the concept of unjust enrichment which it found in the Corpus Iuris, whereas it is only very recently (and outside the chronological scope of this volume) that the Common law has come to accept such a principle.The methods by which the Civil lawyers progressed from their starting point towards the well articulated concepts of the modern law were those of the interpreter and elaborator of texts which had their own unquestioned authority. And their discussions, which were those of the scholar and the school-room, are well documented.For the Common lawyers, on the other hand, the starting point was nothing but the practice of the courts and their methods were those appropriate to that practice. The plaintiff's remedy in a particular case was everything. Moreover, since the practice of the courts until very recent times is very imperfectly evidenced, the course of the development of the Common law is often difficult to trace. The researches contained in this volume show that it is only with benefit of hindsight, and then only to very limited extent, that one can see that development as leading to the recent acceptance of a doctrine of unjust enrichment.…

N° de réf. du vendeur 9783428079827

Détails bibliographiques

Titre
Unjust Enrichment : The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Restitution. With contr. in German
Auteur
Eltjo J. H. Schrage
Éditeur
Duncker & Humblot
Année de publication
1999
État de l'article
Neu
Reliure
Taschenbuch
Langue
anglais
ISBN à 10 chiffres
3428079825
ISBN à 13 chiffres
9783428079827
Édition
2ème Édition
Poids de l'article
446 grammes
Dimensions
233x159x15 mm

AHA-BUCH GmbH

Einbeck, Allemagne

Vendeur avec une évaluation de 5 étoiles

Vendeur AbeBooks depuis 14 août 2006

Frais d'expédition de Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Article7 à 10 jours ouvrés5 à 7 jours ouvrés
Premier articleEUR 35,00EUR 45,00
Les délais de livraison sont fixés par les vendeurs et varient en fonction du transporteur et du lieu. Les commandes transitant par les douanes peuvent être retardées et les acheteurs sont responsables de tous les droits ou frais associés. Les vendeurs peuvent vous contacter au sujet de frais supplémentaires afin de couvrir toute augmentation des coûts d'expédition de vos articles.

Modes de paiement

  • Visa
  • Mastercard
  • American Express
  • Carte Bleue
  • Apple Pay
  • Google Pay
  • Chèque
  • Paypal
  • Virement bancaire

Description de la boutique

Das Unternehmen AHA-BUCH GmbH: Seit der Gründung von AHA-BUCH im Juli 2005 ist unser Hauptziel, zufriedenen Kunden so schnell und so preisgünstig wie möglich ihren Bücherwunsch zu erfüllen. Unsere Firma beschäftigt 16 Mitarbeiter, die nur ein Ziel kennen: den Kunden und seine Wünsche! Auf über 3700 m2 Fläche haben wir über 100.000 Bücher, Modernes Antiquariat und Spiele auf Lager.

Spécialité

Kinderbücher & Kinderhör Casetten, German Books, Software, Natur & Tiere, Ratgeber, Sachbücher, Englische Bücher, Medizin & Gesundheit, Universität & Studium

Profil professionnel du vendeur

AHA-BUCH GmbH

Garlebsen 48
Einbeck, Allemagne 37574