R p horstmann (35 résultats)

paperback. Etat : Very Good. NOT ex-library. Pages crisp, minor underlining. Cover is in good condition. 100% of proceeds go toward promoting literacy in under-served areas of the world.

Soft cover. Etat : Fine. 1st Edition. 12mo. 83 pp. Original textured soft cloth binding. This is a tight, fine book.

Paperback. Etat : Very Good. 1st Edition. First edition, first printing as octavo paperback. 334 pages Very Good condition Previous owner's name on front end paper.

Hardcover. Etat : Very Good+. Etat de la jaquette : Very Good. Unstated printing, hardcover in blue cloth, has a light lean to the binding, as well as slight bumps to the spine ends and cover corners, and overall, is a solid, tight, Very Good+ copy in a Very Good dust jacket, which has bumps with light creasing to the spine ends and corners, sunning to the spine and hinges, and rubbing with some smudging to the covers. The jacket is wrapped in Mylar.…

Softcover. Etat : Gut. 314 S. Ehem. Bibliotheksexemplar mit Signatur und Stempel. GUTER Zustand, ein paar Gebrauchsspuren. Ex-library with stamp and library-signature. GOOD condition, some traces of use. L08031 9027709637 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 580.

paperback. Etat : New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title.

Broschiert. Etat : Sehr gut. 1. Aufl. 311 S. + Index, 23cm x 15cm brosch. Eb., dieser mit minimalen Gebrauchsspuren, Eb. u. Buchschnitt leicht lichtrandig, Teil der Widmung auf Vordatz rausgeschnitten u. mit einem Extrablatt zugeklebt (kein Textverlust), ansonsten sehr guter Zustand. Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 500. …

Etat : New. In English.

Etat : New. In English.

Etat : New.

Etat : New.

Etat : New. pp. 336.

Etat : New. pp. 340.

Etat : gut. 1979. Transcendental Arguments and Science: Essays in Epistemology (= Synthese Library, Band 133) In deutscher Sprache. pages.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The goal of the present volume is to discuss the notion of a 'conceptual framework' or 'conceptual scheme', which has been dominating much work in the analysis and justification of knowledge in recent years. More specifi cally, this volume is designed to clarify the contrast between two competing approaches in the area of problems indicated by this notion: On the one hand, we have the conviction, underlying much present-day work in the philosophy of science, that the best we can hope for in the justifi cation of empirical knowledge is to reconstruct the conceptual means actually employed by science, and to develop suitable models for analyzing conceptual change involved in the progress of science. This view involves the assumption that we should stop taking foundational questions of epistemology seriously and discard once and for all the quest for uncontrovertible truth. The result ing program of justifying epistemic claims by subsequently describing patterns of inferentially connected concepts as they are at work in actual science is closely connected with the idea of naturalizing epistemology, with concep tual relativism, and with a pragmatic interpretation of knowledge. On the other hand, recent epistemology tends to claim that no subsequent reconstruction of actually employed conceptual frameworks is sufficient for providing epistemic justification for our beliefs about the world. This second claim tries to resist the naturalistic and pragmatic approach to epistemology and insists on taking the epistemological sceptic seriously.…

Buch. Etat : Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The goal of the present volume is to discuss the notion of a 'conceptual framework' or 'conceptual scheme', which has been dominating much work in the analysis and justification of knowledge in recent years. More specifi cally, this volume is designed to clarify the contrast between two competing approaches in the area of problems indicated by this notion: On the one hand, we have the conviction, underlying much present-day work in the philosophy of science, that the best we can hope for in the justifi cation of empirical knowledge is to reconstruct the conceptual means actually employed by science, and to develop suitable models for analyzing conceptual change involved in the progress of science. This view involves the assumption that we should stop taking foundational questions of epistemology seriously and discard once and for all the quest for uncontrovertible truth. The result ing program of justifying epistemic claims by subsequently describing patterns of inferentially connected concepts as they are at work in actual science is closely connected with the idea of naturalizing epistemology, with concep tual relativism, and with a pragmatic interpretation of knowledge. On the other hand, recent epistemology tends to claim that no subsequent reconstruction of actually employed conceptual frameworks is sufficient for providing epistemic justification for our beliefs about the world. This second claim tries to resist the naturalistic and pragmatic approach to epistemology and insists on taking the epistemological sceptic seriously. …

Hardcover. Etat : Very Good. Dust Jacket may NOT BE INCLUDED.CDs may be missing. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

872pp. with dust jacket, worn. text good.

Dordrecht, Reidel, 1979. (VIII) 314 pp. Cloth + dustjacket. (SL, 133) *good condition* Contributors Günther Patzig, Richard Rorty, Mary Hesse, C.F. von Weizsäcker a.o.

827pp. lar.8vo. with dust jacket. stamped on lower edge. text fine.

Etat : New.

Etat : New.

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -The goal of the present volume is to discuss the notion of a 'conceptual framework' or 'conceptual scheme', which has been dominating much work in the analysis and justification of knowledge in recent years. More specifi cally, this volume is designed to clarify the contrast between two competing approaches in the area of problems indicated by this notion: On the one hand, we have the conviction, underlying much present-day work in the philosophy of science, that the best we can hope for in the justifi cation of empirical knowledge is to reconstruct the conceptual means actually employed by science, and to develop suitable models for analyzing conceptual change involved in the progress of science. This view involves the assumption that we should stop taking foundational questions of epistemology seriously and discard once and for all the quest for uncontrovertible truth. The result ing program of justifying epistemic claims by subsequently describing patterns of inferentially connected concepts as they are at work in actual science is closely connected with the idea of naturalizing epistemology, with concep tual relativism, and with a pragmatic interpretation of knowledge. On the other hand, recent epistemology tends to claim that no subsequent reconstruction of actually employed conceptual frameworks is sufficient for providing epistemic justification for our beliefs about the world. This second claim tries to resist the naturalistic and pragmatic approach to epistemology and insists on taking the epistemological sceptic seriously. 336 pp. Englisch.…

Buch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -The goal of the present volume is to discuss the notion of a 'conceptual framework' or 'conceptual scheme', which has been dominating much work in the analysis and justification of knowledge in recent years. More specifi cally, this volume is designed to clarify the contrast between two competing approaches in the area of problems indicated by this notion: On the one hand, we have the conviction, underlying much present-day work in the philosophy of science, that the best we can hope for in the justifi cation of empirical knowledge is to reconstruct the conceptual means actually employed by science, and to develop suitable models for analyzing conceptual change involved in the progress of science. This view involves the assumption that we should stop taking foundational questions of epistemology seriously and discard once and for all the quest for uncontrovertible truth. The result ing program of justifying epistemic claims by subsequently describing patterns of inferentially connected concepts as they are at work in actual science is closely connected with the idea of naturalizing epistemology, with concep tual relativism, and with a pragmatic interpretation of knowledge. On the other hand, recent epistemology tends to claim that no subsequent reconstruction of actually employed conceptual frameworks is sufficient for providing epistemic justification for our beliefs about the world. This second claim tries to resist the naturalistic and pragmatic approach to epistemology and insists on taking the epistemological sceptic seriously. 338 pp. Englisch.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Transcendental Arguments and Science | Essays in Epistemology | P. Bieri (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | viii | Englisch | 1979 | Springer | EAN 9789027709646 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …

Buch. Etat : Neu. Transcendental Arguments and Science | Essays in Epistemology | P. Bieri (u. a.) | Buch | viii | Englisch | 1979 | Springer Netherland | EAN 9789027709639 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …

Etat : New. Print on Demand pp. 336 49:B&W 6.14 x 9.21 in or 234 x 156 mm (Royal 8vo) Perfect Bound on White w/Gloss Lam.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -The goal of the present volume is to discuss the notion of a 'conceptual framework' or 'conceptual scheme', which has been dominating much work in the analysis and justification of knowledge in recent years. More specifi cally, this volume is designed to clarify the contrast between two competing approaches in the area of problems indicated by this notion: On the one hand, we have the conviction, underlying much present-day work in the philosophy of science, that the best we can hope for in the justifi cation of empirical knowledge is to reconstruct the conceptual means actually employed by science, and to develop suitable models for analyzing conceptual change involved in the progress of science. This view involves the assumption that we should stop taking foundational questions of epistemology seriously and discard once and for all the quest for uncontrovertible truth. The result ing program of justifying epistemic claims by subsequently describing patterns of inferentially connected concepts as they are at work in actual science is closely connected with the idea of naturalizing epistemology, with concep tual relativism, and with a pragmatic interpretation of knowledge. On the other hand, recent epistemology tends to claim that no subsequent reconstruction of actually employed conceptual frameworks is sufficient for providing epistemic justification for our beliefs about the world. This second claim tries to resist the naturalistic and pragmatic approach to epistemology and insists on taking the epistemological sceptic seriously.Springer-Verlag KG, Sachsenplatz 4-6, 1201 Wien 336 pp. Englisch. …